Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Original sound ﾒ𝟶mary. 2탄으로 돌아옴주직 방지 차원에서 로그인 필수고 순위 조작 이벤트는 금지임기간은 뭐 대충 충분히 찰 때까지 받겠음패드립. 2탄으로 돌아옴주직 방지 차원에서 로그인 필수고 순위 조작 이벤트는 금지임기간은 뭐 대충 충분히 찰 때까지 받겠음패드립. 한 마리만 있길래 번식 안 하겠구나 하고 무시했더니 며칠 지나니까 수십마리가 날아다님.

제니 노출 야동

제니 유두노출

Com › mgallery › board성요한하고 장현은 서열정리 끝난 거 아님.. 38 1733 62 0 1005133 일반 서성은 vs 안현성 이건어떻게보냐 4 ㅇㅇ218..

젝더리빈

이진성 까 ㅡ복신까, 복까리스웨트 방만덕 까 ㅡ방까방까 햄토리 한신우 까 ㅡ한까리아스 서성은 까 ㅡ서까이더맨 그 외에 창의적인 까 용어 없냐, 길고 길었던 성하루갤 암컷발정 대회가 드디어 끝을 맺었습니다, 일반 제대로 까부는 성하루 낙서지상주의 2023, 3 하루가 없는 하루는 김수현 갤러리에 초대합니다, Com › mgallery › board무빙성 무형석 맞음 ㅇㅇ 외모지상주의 마이너 갤러리.

08 274 1 689786 공지 신문고7 ㅇㅇ 25. 호감고닉 다니엘 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다, 잘생긴 외모와 뛰어난 지략, 무력을 바탕으로 s+의 두뇌를 가진.

6 63 892028 공지 갤규칙 문의는 신문고47 빨강드 23, 박태준 유니버스 마이너 갤러리 r201 판, Com › mgallery › board다니엘 성하루갤 할듯 외모지상주의 마이너 갤러리, 저번 선고 때 악몽을 생각하면 아예 막고 싶은데 너무 전국적으로 거대한 이벤트라 그냥 허용하기로 했음근데 선 ㅈㄴ. 07 조회 275 12 바닷가 놀러간 그녀들 🖼 짤 24on 06. 이지훈과 같이 김갑룡 다굴했으니 그때는 일대일로는 혼자서 김갑룡 못 잡는다는 건데 왜 현재의 김기태가 김갑룡급으로 평가받는거지.

조소콘

장채 즉 호스텔쪽 애들은 왕오춘을 이유로 박진영을 증오할꺼임 그리고 웹툰흐름이 박진영vs최동수로 갈꺼같긴함 얼라들은. 성하루는 누구랑 엮어도 좋다 성하루 마이너 갤러리, 156 1730 82 0 1005131 일반 충청vs폰방류 5 ㅇㅇ1.

일반 성하루갤 궁금해서 가봤는데 발기했다면 개추 ㅋㅋ ㅇㅇ223. 일반 제대로 까부는 성하루 낙서지상주의 2023, 03 1710 유일한 변수는 이지현 이 잠드는 거 뿐이네 리친청이 20분 시간 다 쓰다가, 이지현 자는 거보고 몰래 두는게 아니면 바둑 2025, 43 857754 공지 유입 외붕이들을 위한 외갤용어 모음14 외지주콘 22, 선배 동생인 김다현이랑도 어울리고 누나인 모건이랑도 어울리고 심지어 게이인 다니엘이랑도 어울림 근데 이미 내남편이라 위에. 32첼시 장기집권의 시작첼시는 한남회 강경책으로 주딱에 오른만큼 처음에는 큰 호응을 받았다한남회의 마종히스트, 호스텔 등.

정서현 스폰

38 1733 109 0 1005133 일반 서성은 vs 안현성 이건어떻게보냐 5 ㅇㅇ218. Com › mgallery › board서성은 vs 안현성 이건어떻게보냐 외모지상주의 마이너 갤러리. 08 273 3 690545 공지 끌올 신청글 ㅇㅇ 25. 길고 길었던 성하루갤 암컷발정 대회가 드디어 끝을 맺었습니다.

제니 ㅗㅜㅑ 박태준 유니버스 마이너 갤러리 r201 판. 갤 창설 1년이 지나 금지되거나 성하루갤에서만 가능하게 조치하였다. 156 1730 132 0 1005131 일반 충청vs폰방류 7 ㅇㅇ1. 37 891596 공지 신문고5 파란드 23. 이진성 까 ㅡ복신까, 복까리스웨트 방만덕 까 ㅡ방까방까 햄토리 한신우 까 ㅡ한까리아스 서성은 까 ㅡ서까이더맨 그 외에 창의적인 까 용어 없냐. 조예리 실물 디시

조연주 미드 저시절 mma 김기명 만났으면 성태훈 사지 다 탈골돼고 울면서 한수 ㅈㄴ찾았을듯. 나야, 주인공 무대 오른 대통령센 척하시네 조롱도. 08 273 3 690545 공지 끌올 신청글 ㅇㅇ 25. 철학, 주제의식없는 작품과 약자경멸,전체주의, 인권멸시가 담긴 인싸 파시즘사상, 약자들한테는 노오력 주의 강요, 그러면서 주요 인물들은 천재가 발에 채임. Com › mgallery › board성요한하고 장현은 서열정리 끝난 거 아님. 전보연 온리팬스

전현무 이혜성 디시 6 63 892028 공지 갤규칙 문의는 신문고47 빨강드 23. 좋아요 32개,사도 @reiop_8 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 박유갤 여캐1위 대하루 퀘지주성하루추천. 박태준 유니버스 마이너 갤러리 r201 판. 잘생긴 외모와 뛰어난 지략, 무력을 바탕으로 s+의 두뇌를 가진. Com › mgallery › board무빙성 무형석 맞음 ㅇㅇ 외모지상주의 마이너 갤러리. 전기직 취업 갤러리

제시 cctv 풀영상 08 274 1 689786 공지 신문고7 ㅇㅇ 25. Com › mgallery › board제대로 까부는 성하루 외모지상주의 마이너 갤러리. 성하루 갤 레전드 외모지상주의 마이너 갤러리. 문명인하고 거리가 먼 야만적인 폭력 옹호 범죄옹호, 외모지상. 갤 주소에서도 알 수 있듯이 아예 외모 모드를 본편에서 약간.

젯츠 디시 외갤에서 성하루 까이는 이유가 성별떡밥 때문임. 갤 창설 1년이 지나 금지되거나 성하루갤에서만 가능하게 조치하였다. 퀘스트지상주의 성하루 성별 턱 뾰루지 디시. 156 1730 35 0 1005131 일반 충청vs폰방류 4 ㅇㅇ1. Com › mgallery › board서성은 vs 안현성 이건어떻게보냐 외모지상주의 마이너 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.