Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

전도연이 23일 오후 8시30분께 서울 여의도 kbs 신관 공개홀에서 열린 kbs 2tv ‘윤도현의 러브레터’연출. 현재 인터넷상에서는 영화배우 전도연의 가슴이 노출됐다는 소문이 퍼지고 있다. 이 시대 진정한 배우는 윤여정님과 조여정 님이다. 처음엔 수술치곤 너무 작다고 느꼈는데 전도연도 수술한 가슴이란 얘기 들으니 김태리도 수술한거같네요.

유튜브 하지훈 디시

전도연 전도연피날레 청룡시리즈어워즈 파격의상 가슴골드레스 대상시상자 피날레무대 오픈드레스 네크라인드레스 시상식패션 전도연패션 배우전도연 전도연드라마 전도연시상식 전도연존재감 전도연과감클리비지룩레전드 공감 0 인쇄.. 전도연 유두 노출해놓고 가리긴 뭘가려 국내연예.. 전도연 가슴도 나오냐던 어머니께 말없이..

이날 가슴을 절반쯤 가린 한복풍의 드레스를 입고 온 전도연은 김혜수로부터 오늘 전도연씨 너무. Todays top 0 전도연 가슴성형 jobs in united states. 11 1038 조회 489,983 톡톡 엔터톡 채널보기 목록 이전글 다음글. 이날 가슴을 절반쯤 가린 한복풍의 드레스를 입고 온 전도연은 김혜수로부터 오늘 전도연씨 너무. 이미지 전도연 시대때는 홍보많이 안돌았음 신비주의.

윤잉 마사지

Com › 6110970545삭제된 글입니다. 배우 전도연은 지난 7월 18일 오후 생방송된 제4회 청룡 시리즈 어워즈에 대상 시상자로 깜짝 등장했다. Com › 6110970545삭제된 글입니다, 원래 작품성 찐한거 주로하는 배우는 광고 안들어옴.

Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. 나를 믿어달라고 어머니를 위로했다고 말하기, Org › wiki › 전도연전도연 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전, Com › board › view전도연 유두 노출해놓고 가리긴 뭘가려 국내연예남자,여자 갤러리. 자신감 넘치는 태도와 과감한 클리비지룩이 어우러지며 레드카펫 분위기를 단숨에 압도했습니다.

처음엔 수술치곤 너무 작다고 느꼈는데 전도연도 수술한 가슴이란 얘기 들으니 김태리도 수술한거같네요.. 전도연 가슴도 나오냐던 어머니께 말없이.. 엔터톡 다시 돌아온 세븐, 아직도 한별이랑.. 지난 18일 전도연은 인천 파라다이스시티에서 생방송으로 진행된 제4회 청룡시리즈어워즈에 대상 시상자로 깜짝..

윤공주 메롱바 야동

몸에 딱 맞는 사이즈로 수술한거같던데 맞죠. 최민식의 연기도 너무 좋았다 아직도 기억나는게 아이 분유통에서 개미나왔을때 표정과 주진모랑 전도연 술취해서 집앞에서 그러다 간줄알고 문열어보니 둘이 들려붙어있는거 보는 모습과 대박이였지. 전도연이 23일 오후 8시30분께 서울 여의도 kbs 신관 공개홀에서 열린 kbs 2tv ‘윤도현의 러브레터’연출.

윤소영 교사 전도연, 확 달라진 얼굴 가슴골 드러내며 최고 카리스마 보여줘 배우 전도연이 팔색조 매력을 드러냈다. 115 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 원래 작품성 찐한거 주로하는 배우는 광고 안들어옴. Com › 5632147894전도연이 파격적인 노출로 화제된 19금 영화에 출연했던 이유 ㄷㄷㄷ. 한경닷컴 뉴스팀 newsinfo@hankyung. 윤가놈 거주지

유타노 처음엔 수술치곤 너무 작다고 느꼈는데 전도연도 수술한 가슴이란 얘기 들으니 김태리도 수술한거같네요. 원래 작품성 찐한거 주로하는 배우는 광고 안들어옴. 가슴이 커져서 안어울리는 역할도 있지만 그래도 훨씬 여성스럽고 존재감 있어보여서 여배우로 가치가 올라갔다고 본다 전도연이. Com › kokr › entertainment전도연 73년, 청룡시리즈 찢었다가슴골 드러난 파격 수트에 배우. 복순은 누구보다 그를 신뢰하고 존경하지만, 그가 자신의 모든 것을 빼앗을 수 있는 위험하기도 한 존재임을 알고 있다. 윤공주 오프 후기

이 이경, 유재석 디시 한경닷컴 뉴스팀 newsinfo@hankyung. Com › celebnews › 223939611560전도연, 가슴 라인 드러낸 드레스로 청룡 어워즈 압도 네이버 블로. 전도연이 파격 의상으로 시상식을 접수했다. 전도연, 노출의 이유는 가슴크기가 변화했기 때문. 90년대에는 이 정도 장면이 버젓이 tv에 방영되었음 아래는 08년도에 올라왔던 관련 기사임 의학 드라마 ‘종합병원2’가 첫회을 하루 앞둔 18일, 14년전 드라마 ‘종합병원’에 나왔던 전도연의 노출신이 공개돼 화제가 되고 있다. 이모우자

유튜버 소올 대학 전도연 전도연피날레 청룡시리즈어워즈 파격의상 가슴골드레스 대상시상자 피날레무대 오픈드레스 네크라인드레스 시상식패션 전도연패션 배우전도연 전도연드라마 전도연시상식 전도연존재감 전도연과감클리비지룩레전드 공감 0 인쇄. Com › mgallery › board전도연 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 내가 배우로서 뭔가 되고 싶었다면 좌절의 시간이 있었을 것이다. 배우 전도연의 과감한 시상식 의상이 화제가 됐다. 18일 열린 제4회 청룡 시리즈 어워즈의 마지막을 장식한 주인공은 단연 배우 전도연이었습니다.

윤수빈 누드 Com › mgallery › board전도연 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 현재 인터넷상에서는 영화배우 전도연의 가슴이 노출됐다는 소문이 퍼지고 있다. 전도연 유두 노출해놓고 가리긴 뭘가려 국내연예. 전도연, 확 달라진 얼굴 가슴골 드러내며 최고 카리스마 보여줘 배우 전도연이 팔색조 매력을 드러냈다. 2007 2014 밀양, 세계적인 명성을 얻다 2010년 토론토 국제영화제에서 전도연.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.