Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

한국의 실력파 가수 소향이 가창을 맡은 디즈니 애니메이션 모아나의 주제곡 1월 12일 개봉 모아나는 개봉과 동시에 북미 박스오피스 3주 연속 1. 테 카가 물을 무서워한다는 점을 이용해 상황을 극복하려 하나 실패하고 마우이가 떠나게 된다. It means, what should i do뭐 하나. In korean also it sounds like ‘moana’ my favorite disney character.

美ノ辺さやか

Com › postview모하나 ost how far i’ll go 언젠가 떠날거야 영어가사 한글가사.. 한국의 실력파 가수 소향이 가창을 맡은 디즈니 애니메이션 모아나의 주제곡 1월 12일 개봉 모아나는 개봉과 동시에 북미 박스오피스 3주 연속 1.. B：여기 빨리 정리하고 건물 안으로 들어갑시다.. In korean also it sounds like ‘moana’ my favorite disney character..

木更津体育大学 相撲部女子「男には負けたくない、絶対に」土俵に立ったら、表情を崩さず何をされても取り組みする！！新入部員編 4p相撲

전반적으로, 모아나 2는 전편의 감동과 아름다움을 유지하면서도 새로운 도전에 맞서는 모아나의 성장과 여정을 그립니다. 「하나만 알고 둘은 모른다」という韓国の諺は、「一つだけ知っていて、二つは知らない」と直訳されます。この諺は、限られた知識しかなく、広い理解, 뭐 하나 mwo hana 「何一つ」という意味。何かを指して一つもないことを強調する表現です。. 전반적으로, 모아나 2는 전편의 감동과 아름다움을 유지하면서도 새로운 도전에 맞서는 모아나의 성장과 여정을 그립니다. 🐾 모하나 tv에 오신 것을 환영합니다.

1,607 followers, 412 following, 39 posts 모하나 @mo_hana_1 on instagram 일러스트레이터 📧 junso705@naver, 해당월의 고용노동 통계, 해당년도의 최저임금액, 소통유튜브, 카드뉴스 등, 국민소통채널관련링크로 구성되어 있습니다, Com › questions › 20296364모하나とはどういう意味ですか？ 韓国語に関する質問 hinativ. What is the meaning of 모하남.

玥下pikpak

보컬베이스 이지연, 기타 이병근, 드럼 패트릭으로 구성되어 있다.. 그리고 이번에 작성할 가사는 모아나 ost 노래 중 how far ill go 입니다..

2024년 2월 8일, 제작이 채 시작되지도 않은 상황에서 원작의 속편인 〈모아나 2〉가 2024년 11월 27일에 개봉하기로 하면서 드웨인 존슨이 출연은 물론 자신의 제작사를 통해 제작에도 참여하는 이번 작품의 개봉일이 변경될 가능성이 제기되었다. Hello my name is mohana. See a translation the owner of it will not be notified. ・, 모든 작업을 빠짐없이 완료했습니다.

가면라이더 디케 이드 1화 자막 2024년 2월 8일, 제작이 채 시작되지도 않은 상황에서 원작의 속편인 〈모아나 2〉가 2024년 11월 27일에 개봉하기로 하면서 드웨인 존슨이 출연은 물론 자신의 제작사를 통해 제작에도 참여하는 이번 작품의 개봉일이 변경될 가능성이 제기되었다. Com › entry › 영화모하나2줄거리영화 모하나 2 줄거리, 마케팅과 개봉,국내외 반응. 정확한 명칭은 real person slash로, 해외에서는 이것의 두문자어인 rps로 read more. See a translation the owner of it will not be notified. 그래서 언어표현에 투영되어 있는 문화적 요소를 추출하고 이를 분석하여 이 異문화 교육에 활용하는 것은 유의미한 일이라 할 수 있다. 가경 야동

ㅗㅜ ㅑ 한 이상형 월드컵 Com › watchsohyang 나 언젠간 떠날 거야 from 모아나 youtube. ・, 모든 작업을 빠짐없이 완료했습니다. ・ 全てのタスクを漏れなく完了しました。. Solar powered trio rock band. 모하나 tv 강아지 동물 ai 영상과 따뜻한 강아지 스토리텔링으로 일상의 힐링을 전합니다. 간단 입싸

雪女さん pikpak What is the meaning of 모하남. Com › questions › 20296364what is the meaning of 모하나. 정확한 명칭은 real person slash로, 해외에서는 이것의 두문자어인 rps로 read more. 서론 언어와 문화와의 밀접한 관계를 제시하는 것은 외국어 교육 본연의 자세인 동시에 학문에 있어서의 해석이다. 정확한 명칭은 real person slash로, 해외에서는 이것의 두문자어인 rps로 read more. 物集女 燦

女孩 sotwe 70 모아나 역의 아울리이 크러발리오는 이번 작품으로 데뷔하게 된 신인이다. 미국의 교양교육에서 통합교육에 대한 논의가 20세기 초중반부터 계속되어. 그리고 이번에 작성할 가사는 모아나 ost 노래 중 how far ill go 입니다. Com › @mohana_kr모하나 tv youtube. 잔교리 해변 잘 있어요👋🏻 오기 전엔 모하나 카페에 대한 기대가 컸는데 딱 기대만큼 괜찮았고 바로 앞 해변이 정말 좋았어요 바다가 정말 가까이 있다는 점.

가슴 만지는 움짤 디즈니의 56번째 애니메이션 작품으로, 론 클레먼츠 와 존 머스커 가 감독을 맡았다. Com › watchsohyang 나 언젠간 떠날 거야 from 모아나 youtube. 해당월의 고용노동 통계, 해당년도의 최저임금액, 소통유튜브, 카드뉴스 등, 국민소통채널관련링크로 구성되어 있습니다. 《모아나》 moana 또는 vaiana, oceania는 미국에서 2016년 개봉한 3d 컴퓨터 애니메이션 뮤지컬 모험 영화 이다. 디즈니의 56번째 애니메이션 작품으로, 론 클레먼츠 와 존 머스커 가 감독을 맡았다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.