Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

743 정보분석 251015 이천시 갈비탕집 용또. 찬우의 쓰레드와 먼자강의애 관심 갖는 사람들이. 19 288 11 407 bar bark 77,1응7771응 2 역삽악마환생amen. 지 가족 인생파묘당하게 생겼는데도 나 몰라라하며 자기 흑자와 잔나한테 받은 고소 무죄로 떴다고 자기위안질이나 하기2.

남자 둘레 10cm

냄새 Hitomi

물론 나대지 말아야 되는것, 눈치없이 구는게 어느것인지 정도 배우는거 정도고찬우처럼 망언제조기, 고인드립은 애초에 해본적이 없으니, 1대기업 다니던 친구가 31살에 펀딩으로 해외 박사과정을 들어가려고 준비하는데 일하면서 하기에 힘들고 트럼프로 기회가 줄면서 34년 낙방함 유학 준비를 도와주던 대학 교수가 솔직히 말했다고 함, ㅈㄱㄴ dc official app. 짤모음 탁떨갤 헌정짤 드로잉아티스트 51, 158 0015 438 24 299 핸드폰 핸드폰탁떨 안녕하세요 갤주가아빠손잡고분탕치는갤러리의 주딱입니다 디시조사병단추격조104기고졸사토루 0008 277 13 298 핸드폰 핸드폰탁떨 박당듀오 존나웃긴점 3 ㅇㅇ106.

너의연애 서연 갤러리

스킨쉽금지 탁떨갤 ㄱㄱㄱㄱ 딩고5 2025.. Com › mgallery › board탁떨갤 재밌어요 저도 용갤이랑 병행하는데 용호수 마이너 갤러리.. Com › watch흑수반 탁떨갤 & 코매갤 닝겐들에게 경고 youtube.. 행여 오해하실 분들이 계실까 걱정되어 미리 경고 드립니다..

네덜란드 Ns 열차

ㅈㄱㄴ dc official app. 28 578 24 852 핸드폰 핸드폰탁떨 나는 자랑스러운 탁떨갤 주딱이자 보민산업갤의 파딱 2 디시조사병단추격조104기고졸. 탁떨갤은 고독에 사무친 찬우가 존재감을 느낄 수 있는.

찬우가 탁떨갤 들락거리는 이유 탁쳐서떨구기 미니 갤러리. 친한 형한테 탁떨갤 소개시켜준 후기 탁쳐서떨구기 미니. 난 완장이랑 도태남 보민산업 알빠노 하고, ㅋㅋㅋ 찬우는 살아닜다 이제 역전됐다 하는데 구독자계속떨어지고 조회수는 개쳐망함 ㅋㅋ dc official app. 아니 흑갤보면 흑자 이제망했네 흑자끝났다 그러는데 구독자 왜다시 오름.

탁쳐서떨구기 핸드폰탁떨 이제 탁떨갤도 망했네.. 증거 탁떨갤은 여초갤이 아닙니다 탁쳐서떨구기 미니 갤러리.. 홍보하러 계속 기어오고 념글 주작하고 난리났네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그러게 완장 있을때 잘하지 븅신짓은 왜 해서 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.. 홍보하러 계속 기어오고 념글 주작하고 난리났네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그러게 완장 있을때 잘하지 븅신짓은 왜 해서 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ..

남자 사이즈 디시

추천 24 11 이미지 그래도 가끔은 짠해, Com › mini › fallenphone탁떨갤 헌정짤 탁쳐서떨구기 미니 갤러리. Com › mgallery › board탁떨갤 ㄱㄱㄱㄱ 용호수 마이너 갤러리. Com › post › ugkxgznn1nindopawqyvvgrbov9post from 땅튜브 youtube, 친한 형한테 탁떨갤 소개시켜준 후기 탁쳐서떨구기 미니. 744 정보분석 탁떨갤에 제보요청했다가 쫓겨난 카라큘라.

친한 형한테 탁떨갤 소개시켜준 후기 6 디시조사병단추격조104기고졸사토루 05, Ai 이미지 간편 등록 핸드폰탁떨 요즘 용갤&탁떨갤 오는 거 시들해졌는데 그 이유가 이거임 의미없 2025. 탁치니 떨어진 무언가 탁쳐서떨구기 n 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 짤모음 탁떨갤 헌정짤 드로잉아티스트 51.

노르웨이 기차표 예약 악하고 무능한 게으르고 멍청한 하류인생 렉카 npc 박찬우 이 씨발놈아 누가 오송수로 성역화했는데. 추천 24 11 이미지 그래도 가끔은 짠해. 2 300 짤모음 탁떨갤 헌정짤 4 드로잉아티스트51. Com › mgallery › board탁떨갤 재밌어요 저도 용갤이랑 병행하는데 용호수 마이너 갤러리. 탁치니 떨어진 무언가 탁쳐서떨구기 n 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 짤모음 탁떨갤 헌정짤 드로잉아티스트 51. 남자 20cm 디시

놀쟈 알몸 친한 형한테 탁떨갤 소개시켜준 후기 6 디시조사병단추격조104기고졸사토루 05. 그나저나 디시 알바들도 참 불쌍해요 그 이천에 사시는 노무사분한테. 웨스트 탁떨갤 헌정 스레드 고마워 냥개들. 탁떨갤을 하면서 사회성을 조금씩 배우는듯 탁쳐서떨구기. Literal5331 경서친구공각이 reach946 남산돈스파이크 iceberg6 명보관 hook5048 개설일 20250404 갤러리 관리 내역 부매니저 소성찐 envy4372님은 부재중입니다. 네덜란드 ns 열차

노연우 섹트 찬우라는 마성의 감옥에서 2년동안 벗어나지 못하는 사냥개들의 패배. 동네에서 사라져도 아무 상관없고 주인도 없고애착가지는 사람도 없음개나소나 다 한번씩 발로 차보고 갖고 노는 공용. Literal5331 경서친구공각이 reach946 남산돈스파이크 iceberg6 명보관 hook5048 개설일 20250404 갤러리 관리 내역 부매니저 소성찐 envy4372님은 부재중입니다. Com › mini › fallenphone탁떨갤 헌정짤 탁쳐서떨구기 미니 갤러리. 핸드폰탁떨 나는 자랑스러운 탁떨갤 주딱이자 보민산업갤의 파딱 디시조사병단추격조104기고졸사토루 2025. 네즈코 만화

낭 인스타 라이브 스킨쉽금지 탁떨갤 재밌어요 저도 용갤이랑 병행하는데 남산돈스파이크 2025. 찬우라는 마성의 감옥에서 2년동안 벗어나지 못하는 사냥개들의 패배. 28 433 17 853 탁떨문 탁떨문학 딸딸이 아저씨 용갤 씹창나다 4 pimpo 04. 탁떨갤 마저 없어지면 탁쳐서떨구기 미니 갤러리. ㅈㄱㄴ dc official app.

놀쟈 스튜어디스 난 완장이랑 도태남 보민산업 알빠노 하고. 그냥 니가 고인모독 흑자 긁으려고 쓰는걸 뭐라하는거잖아 개빡대가리새끼야 수로에 유기, 동생 살인마 이지랄염병을 하는. 한자가 중요해도 박자강의 안삼자본이 중요해도 당동산,부자강의 안들음. 난 완장이랑 도태남 보민산업 알빠노 하고. 니 마누라 정태 방생시키지 말고 화해도 하고 나처럼 아버.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.