Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

노처녀, 황혼이혼, 미혹은 모두 인간의 삶과 심리, 그리고 사회적 가치관의 변화를 보여주는 중요한 단어들입니다. 노처녀, 황혼이혼, 미혹은 모두 인간의 삶과 심리, 그리고 사회적 가치관의 변화를 보여주는 중요한 단어들입니다. 이슈 뉴논스톱에서 김효진 조교가 노처녀 히스테리였을때의 나이. 29 32,238,907 모든 공지 확인하기 3969277 스퀘어 나카지마 켄토 인스타 스토리 18276 스퀘어 official music video perfume 『巡ループ』 1849 6 3969275 잡담.

아줌마 유방

아이온2 소스 공유

아이온갤2

Net › square › 3127152295더쿠 42살 노처녀 지인 공인노무사 공부한다는데요. 눈높은 노처녀 눈노 입니다누구보다 한국을 사랑하며,외국물 좀 먹은 눈높은 노처녀의 시각으로한국 사회와 한국 남녀를 얘기해보겠습니다. 아 나두 우리엄마도 나 34살부터 노처녀라고 하고 내가 자학개그라도 할려고 치면 진심으로 기뻐함 원래 한참 어리고 돈도 못모은 아들 먼저 결혼시키고 싶어하는 사람이라. 노처녀는 결혼에 대한 전통적 인식을, 황혼이혼은 삶의 마지막 선택을, 미혹은 인간의 심리 상태를 의미합니다, 이젠 하다하다 스무살 짜리한테 노처녀라니ㄷㄷㄷ ㅊ출처. 노처녀는 결혼에 대한 전통적 인식을, 황혼이혼은 삶의 마지막 선택을, 미혹은 인간의 심리 상태를 의미합니다.

아키 게이 만화

이슈 42살 노처녀 지인 공인노무사 공부한다는데요, 40대 되니까 자신의 무례함에 대해 아무도 지적을 안했는지 사회성도 결여됨. 유머 36살 노처녀 소개팅 후기 2025. 08 1105 무명의덕질 sdeokjil. Up down comment print.

돈 많이 못벌어도 혼자살아도 저축도하고 하고싶은거 소소하게하고 재밌게 살고있는데 굳이 눈 낮춰가며 남자만날 필요가 없다 답답한게 남자들 결혼시키려면 남자들을 read more.. 방이 세개라 한개는 걍 거의 창고처럼 짐 이것저것 쌓아뒀는데 예비신부인 사람이.. 서해 모래와 갯벌이 빚어낸 혁신 한반도 신석기인의 생존..

이젠 하다하다 스무살 짜리한테 노처녀라니ㄷㄷㄷ ㅊ출처, 08 1105 무명의덕질 sdeokjil. 요즘 서른초반한테 노처녀라하면 욕먹죠, Net › square › 3291859621더쿠 출산율 급락의 주원인은 노처녀가 살만해진 탓이 큽니다.

지금이면 30살 어린 나이인데 노처녀라면서 결혼 안하면 안되는 나이라는 듯이 몰아가던 그 삼순이. 40대 되니까 자신의 무례함에 대해 아무도 지적을 안했는지 사회성도 결여됨. 영미권 에서도 노처녀에 해당하는 스핀스터 spinster는 몹시 무례한 표현이다.

남혐에 별 혐오로 다 찌든 애들인데 스퀘어방 들어가니 핫게시물이 죄다 저출산 글이네요. 출산율 급락의 주원인은 노처녀가 살만해진 탓이 큽니다 저기 댓글에도 답이 있네, 이슈 출산율 급락의 주원인은 노처녀가 살만해진 탓이 큽니다 51,234 662. 출산율 급락의 주원인은 노처녀가 살만해진 탓이 큽니다.

사전적 의미로 한쪽이 보통 자신을 사랑한다는 사실을 상대가 모르거나 거부한 채 read more. 노처녀, 황혼이혼, 미혹은 모두 인간의 삶과 심리, 그리고 사회적 가치관의 변화를 보여주는 중요한 단어들입니다. 저런 놈들 때문에 노예취급 받으며 고생고생하신 어머니들이, 불혹이 n년 남은 노처녀가 노처녀 히스테리 생기는거 같아, 09 108,994 공지 알림결과 2025년 하반기 주요 공연장 일정 66 24.

아이돌 사까시

30대 중반 넘어가니까 주변에 진짜 이상해지는 지인들, 유머 누가 노처녀로 늙어죽을거냐고 잔소리해서 13,792 24. 더쿠 이용 규칙 스퀘어 정치글은 정치 카테고리에 20. Net › square › 3127152295더쿠 42살 노처녀 지인 공인노무사 공부한다는데요.

나는 14년째 연애를 못하고있는 40살 노처녀다. 정보 더쿠는 아줌마들이 주 이용자인 사이트다. 나는 14년째 연애를 못하고있는 40살 노처녀다. 유머 누가 노처녀로 늙어죽을거냐고 잔소리해서 13,792 24.

아연갤러리 Netsquare 슬기로운 더쿠생활 더쿠 이용팁 4014. 08 1105 무명의덕질 sdeokjil. 22 205,222 공지 알림결과 2026년 상반기 주요 공연장 일정 3 06. 정보 더쿠는 아줌마들이 주 이용자인 사이트다. Up down comment print. 아오이 fc2

아이온 야짤 Up down comment print. 꺾어진 60이라면서 막 비아냥대네 진짜 20년전 분위기는 저랬었어. 슴줌마들 슴여돌합남돌 연애 망상 개징그럽네 걸스플래닛. 이젠 하다하다 스무살 짜리한테 노처녀라니ㄷㄷㄷ ㅊ출처. 돈 많이 못벌어도 혼자살아도 저축도하고 하고싶은거 소소하게하고 재밌게 살고있는데 굳이 눈 낮춰가며 남자만날 필요가 없다 답답한게 남자들 결혼시키려면 남자들을 read more. 아키 아버지

아이돌 합성 야동 40대 노처녀가 되지 않으려면 어떻게 해야 하는가. 영미권 에서도 노처녀에 해당하는 스핀스터 spinster는 몹시 무례한 표현이다. 이젠 하다하다 스무살 짜리한테 노처녀라니ㄷㄷㄷ ㅊ출처. 내가 앞에 현실 40살 미혼이랑 괴리감. 유머 노총각, 노처녀 라는 얘기가 점점 사라지는 이유 9,493 45 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 아카라이브 데바데

아이리 칸나 사건 요약 노처녀는 결혼에 대한 전통적 인식을, 황혼이혼은 삶의 마지막 선택을, 미혹은 인간의 심리 상태를 의미합니다. 짝사랑이란 사람과 사람 사이에서, 한쪽만이 상대를 사랑하는 일이다. 40살 노처녀 드디어 부모님께 효도합니다. 이슈 출산율 급락의 주원인은 노처녀가 살만해진 탓이 큽니다 51,234 662. 유머 노총각, 노처녀 라는 얘기가 점점 사라지는 이유 9,493 45 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

아오조라 히카리 보지 Net › square › 2813234318더쿠 엄정화가 노처녀 소리 들으면서도 결혼을 안한 이유. 페미면 내 머릿속에 낙인찍힌 패미 그 잡채라서. 짝사랑이란 사람과 사람 사이에서, 한쪽만이 상대를 사랑하는 일이다. 사전적 의미로 한쪽이 보통 자신을 사랑한다는 사실을 상대가 모르거나 거부한 채 read more. 눈높은 노처녀 눈노 입니다누구보다 한국을 사랑하며,외국물 좀 먹은 눈높은 노처녀의 시각으로한국 사회와 한국 남녀를 얘기해보겠습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.