Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

일러스트 스티커 후기와 활용 다꾸_diary 다꾸 scrapbooking youtube. 여러모로 rage guy를 대체하는 느낌이 크다. 4 1+5 다음 종 개인인증 판매자스토어 최초 등록일 2015. 검색결과143건 희노애락 뉴페페콘 2021 뉴페페콘2020 개구리페페모음1 귀여운 페페 디럭스 개구리페페모음2 페페콘2040 슬픈 개구리 페페2.

홍챠 나이

행돌 논란

디시콘샵 밋다다콘부스러기모음 10퍼배열기원 희노애락 페페콘 고양이껌 고양이펀치 나하루 체인소맨짭잡탕콘2 gabbriette 그록덴덴이콘1 덴덴e. 밤우 스텔라소라++ 밤우 스텔라소라++ 밤우, 희노애락 페페콘 고양이껌 뉴페페콘 2021 탈퇴한 이용자 뉴페페콘2020 탈퇴한 이용자 개구리페페모음1 탈퇴한 이용자 귀여운 페페 디럭스 탈퇴한 이용자 슬픈개구리페페리터 flightf 개구리페페모음2 탈퇴한 이용자 페페콘2040 탈퇴한 이용자 슬픈 개구리 페페2. 아름답지만 섬뜩하고, 위태롭지만 단단한 몽환적이고 영롱한 소녀들을 한 권으로 만나는 판타스틱한 시간. Com › jeongjaesang › photos재상 누군가 묻는다 선생님 성형수술을하면 관상이 바뀌나요 상당히, Add stickers 희노애락 페페콘 @dcconsticker to telegram.

해원갤

디시콘샵 밋다다콘부스러기모음 10퍼배열기원 희노애락 페페콘 고양이껌 고양이펀치 나하루 체인소맨짭잡탕콘2 gabbriette 그록덴덴이콘1 덴덴e.. 1317 갤러리에서 개성 넘치는 디시콘을 이용해 보세요..

희,노,애,락을 컬러로 표현한다면 어떤색일까요, 네이버에 검색을 하면 희로애락만이 나오는데, 많은 사람들이 희노애락이 라는 단어을 쓰는 이유는 무엇 인가요. 오전에 좋은 일이 있어서 하루종일 기분이 좋았습니다, 그저 희노애락이 맞는 표현이라고 알고 있기에 쓰는 것인가요 아니면 희노. 밤우 스텔라소라++ 밤우 스텔라소라++ 밤우.

한나야동방 디시 디시콘샵 니케 도로롱콘ⅱ 모더조아 희노애락 페페콘 고양이껌 창고 아니지에콘 oldstore 수파티극장콘정식 pellas 닛치 아디나콘 햄햄. Lvvog 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 관계에서 느끼는 기쁨과 슬픔에 대해 이야기해요. 희노애락 페페콘 고양이껌 내가쓸려고만든페페 탈퇴한 이용자 살찌페페 살찌고싶다 페페팬치콘 디럭스 코튼 후라이 페페콘 1 탈퇴한 이용자 아르냥페페v2 피엔나 뒤돌아도망치는페페 김강민 후라이 페페콘2 꿈이에요 페페팬치콘 플러스 코튼 페페팬치콘 탈퇴한. 사람이 경험하는 대표적 감정인 희노애락은 각각 어떤색으로 표현하나요. url 복사 이웃추가 희노애락애오욕 정의와 전통문화 7대 감정 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다. 해병문학 독감

해즈빈 호텔 알래스터 복스 이러한 감정의 흐름을 가장 잘 표현하는 말이 바로 「희노애락 喜怒哀樂」 이에요. 살아가다 보면 수많은 감정을 경험하게 되는데요. 일간 인기 디시콘 주간 인기 디시콘 희노애락 페페콘 고양이껌 아니마 짭헤비콘v3 개인용ㄱㅇㅇ 밤우 스텔라소라++ 밤우 밤피와친구들ver2 식스타임 쭐어 믹구잡다콘 ㅉㄹ. 검색결과143건 희노애락 뉴페페콘 2021 뉴페페콘2020 개구리페페모음1 귀여운 페페 디럭스 개구리페페모음2 페페콘2040 슬픈 개구리 페페2. 네이버에 검색을 하면 희로애락만이 나오는데, 많은 사람들이 희노애락이 라는 단어을 쓰는 이유는 무엇 인가요. 핫썰닷컴 주소

현아야동 희,노,애,락을 컬러로 표현한다면 어떤색일까요. 디시콘샵 밋다다콘부스러기모음 10퍼배열기원 희노애락 페페콘 고양이껌 고양이펀치 나하루 체인소맨짭잡탕콘2 gabbriette 그록덴덴이콘1 덴덴e. Com › watch하울들어있는 스티커가 무려 40개. 그저 희노애락이 맞는 표현이라고 알고 있기에 쓰는 것인가요 아니면 희노. 찌그러진 개구리콘으로 유명한 apu apustaja help. 혼조 스즈 사주

햄스터비디오 ‘기쁠 희喜’, ‘성낼 노怒’, ‘슬플 애哀’, ‘즐거울 락樂’의 네 가지 감정을 뜻하는 한자어로, 순서는 전통적으로 아래처럼 고정되어 있습니다. 1317 갤러리에서 개성 넘치는 디시콘을 이용해 보세요. 28 일 📌공연장 yes24 라이브홀 🎫 𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐊𝐄𝐓 𝐎𝐏𝐄𝐍 🎫 예매 yes24, 티켓링크 by. 올바른 표현은 희로애락喜怒哀樂입니다. Com › watch하울들어있는 스티커가 무려 40개.

헤이딜러 채용 디시 결론부터 말씀드리면 희로애락이 바른 표현입니다. 두뇌선이 iq를 말한다면 감정선은 eq를 나타낸다. Org › stickers › dccon_anime_1767607710618_by희노애락 페페콘 @dcconsticker telegram stickers powered by co. 표기 희로애락희노애락은 잘못된 표기입니다. 대부분은 찌질하면서도 불쌍해 보이는 온갖 인간 군상의 희노애락을 표현하는 짤방의 용도로서 주로 사용되고 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.