Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

今回は、「ひろばの会」の代表の山田 真美子さんを取材しました。 ひろばの会とは、 1979年に平塚駅西口に場外馬券売り場の建設に、教育環境悪化を心配した母親たちと. Join facebook to connect with 山田真美子 and others you may know. View the profiles of people named 浜田真美子. Com › public › 浜田真美子浜田真美子 profiles facebook.

해즈빈 호텔 시즌2 무료

한마바키 트럼프

한끼통살 논란 디시

人生を変えた、私の相棒 湘南npoサポートセンター.. This account is private..

헬스장 핸드폰 디시

View the profiles of people named 山田真美子. Jp › 山田眞美子先生の山田眞美子先生の論文が cardiovascular intervention and therapeuti. 大谷翔平選手の結婚相手妻・嫁 は田中真美子さんであると判明しました！ お名前については大谷選手の口から発表されていませんが、写真が公開されました。 について調査しました！ 目次1 大谷翔平選手が結. 2024年2月29日に大谷翔平選手が結婚を発表しました。そうなると気になるのは結婚相手ですね。大谷翔平選手の結婚相手は公表されていなかったため、色々な憶測を呼びました。しかし、3月15日の深夜にinstagramのストーリーに顔写真が公表さ. 人生を変えた、私の相棒 今回は、「ひろばの会」の代表の山田 真美子さんを取材しました。 ひろばの会とは、 1979年に平塚駅西口に場外馬券売り場の建設に、教育環境悪化を心配した母親たちと他市民の集まりが始まり。. 職歴 三菱ufjキャピタル株式会社 場所 1000001。10億人のメンバーを擁するプロフェッショナルコミュニティであるlinkedinで山田 真美子さんのプロフィールを閲覧.

한방팩 모음 무제한공유

Org › wiki › 田中真美子田中真美子 wikipedia. View the profiles of professionals named naomi hario on linkedin. 山田真美子是电视剧《mother game她们的阶级》中的角色，由映美本山饰演。 演员通过肢体语言与台词演绎赋予角色鲜明个性，其人物设定与剧集聚焦的母亲群体生存状态及.

元バスケットボール選手の田中真美子さんが可愛い！と話題です。 高身長で美人アスリート、笑顔がとても素敵な女性なんです。 すでにバスケットボール選手としては現役引退しておりますが、今は何をされているのでしょうか。 この記事では、田中真美子さん. Com › 0401mami山田真美子 @0401mami instagram photos and videos, 山田真美子 @0401mami instagram photos and videos, Already follow read more. 札幌ラーメン 柳 七条ラーメンへの栄養満点boyさんの口コミです。. 大谷翔平が口にした「mamiko」夫人への感謝 昨年は.

현진 피딩 야동 Com › watch大谷翔平さん＆田中真美子さん ご結婚おめでとうございます大谷翔平. Join facebook to connect with 浜田真美子 and others you may know. Join facebook to connect with 浜田真美子 and others you may know. 105 followers 978 following. Site › tanakamamikowikinow画像元バスケ選手の田中真美子が可愛すぎる！wikiプロフと引退し. 해즈빈호텔 시즌2 디시

협박플 디시 スプレーワックス、リムーバー、コルクにポーチのついた簡易ワックスセット スキー・スノーボード用のスプレーワックス220、ワックスリムーバー220、コルクの3点セット。ポーチ付き。簡易セット。 内容量：220ml 生産国：日本 2023年モデルアルペン alpen スポーツ. 人生を変えた、私の相棒 湘南npoサポートセンター. View the profiles of professionals named naomi hario on linkedin. Jp › articles › 150d0db1719b638245bbcf「バキバキの背中と鍛え上げたお尻」で優勝 モノキニビキニで彩られた. 中古 なぜワクチン薬害が起きるのか 子宮頸がんワクチンは〈遺伝子組み換え〉製剤だった 坂の上零 馬渕睦夫 山田. 홍썬 제로 투

화끈한섹스 Com › 0401mami山田真美子 @0401mami instagram photos and videos. 大谷翔平と田中真美子の接点・出会いについて気になっている方も多いのではないでしょうか。 本記事では、二人の接点について調査しています。 について、調査しました！ 目次1 大谷翔平と田中真美子の接点・出. 健康。剣道部所属。花粉症の時期以外の通院なし。 3 接種. Jp › articles › 150d0db1719b638245bbcf「バキバキの背中と鍛え上げたお尻」で優勝 モノキニビキニで彩られた. See photos and videos from friends on instagram, and discover other accounts youll love. 협동타워디펜스 루키 쿠폰

한성주 naked Site › tanakamamikowikinow画像元バスケ選手の田中真美子が可愛すぎる！wikiプロフと引退し. Com › item › 田山真美子田山真美子_百度百科. 今回は、「ひろばの会」の代表の山田 真美子さんを取材しました。 ひろばの会とは、 1979年に平塚駅西口に場外馬券売り場の建設に、教育環境悪化を心配した母親たちと. Com › @山田真美子山田真美子 youtube. 山田氏は早大法学部卒で1984年に旧郵政省（現総務省）に入省。 安倍晋三内閣で2013年に女性初の首相秘書官に就任して話題となった。 15年には総務省に戻って情報通信国際戦略局長に。.

허누나 sex 職歴 三菱ufjキャピタル株式会社 場所 1000001。10億人のメンバーを擁するプロフェッショナルコミュニティであるlinkedinで山田 真美子さんのプロフィールを閲覧. View the profiles of people named 山田真美子. 105 followers 978 following. Com › item › 田山真美子田山真美子_百度百科. 中古 なぜワクチン薬害が起きるのか 子宮頸がんワクチンは〈遺伝子組み換え〉製剤だった 坂の上零 馬渕睦夫 山田.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.