Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이름 히마리 himari 생년월일 키 가슴 사이즈 q컵 쓰리 사이즈 bwh cm 혈액형 출생지 후쿠오카 취미 특기 다이빙 데뷔 2024년 04월 현재 활동 중. 오늘 킅 이겼으면 좋겠는데 이기면 또 심정이 이상할 거 같음. Mp4 171 3 여친이랑 텔가서 이거 해보신 분. 김민재는 뮌헨 공식전 100번째 경기를 소화했으나 팀이 패배하면서 끝내 웃지 못했다.

가슴둘레 118cm 자세한 사항은 영상을 통해 확인바랍니다, Cemd676 무검열 유출 히마리 코사카, 브래지어도 안 입고 날치알을 넣은 채 부끄러운 데이트 i컵 가슴을 흔들며 밖에서는 자위 오르가즘을 느낀다, 20 1802 방금검색해봣음 4월에 데뷔하는 신인이고 이름은 himari 예고영상봣는대 뻥튀기 심한듯 q컵까진아님 그 누구냐 히토미 보다 훨씬작음 급하게다녀옴 2024, @tokyoeverydayshe himari with qcup av actress japanbeauty silhouette kanaboon.

며며ㅕ 꼭노

Com › rnsdltladl777 › 223415134196히마리, himari, 프로필, 엄청난 q컵의 미드를 가진 육덕 배우. Com › postviewmidv726 히마리 네이버 블로그, Com › rnsdltladl777 › 223415134196히마리, himari, 프로필, 엄청난 q컵의 미드를 가진 육덕 배우.

히마리 20412 87% 20260122 hd, Com › 6848315362일본 q컵 배우 이야기 듣고 궁금해서 일본 사는 친구한테 물어봄 치. 히나타 히마리 日向陽葵｜ himari hinata 파일fgecdntviaatzdg, 히나타 히마리 日向陽葵｜ himari hinata 파일fgecdntviaatzdg, 20 1802 방금검색해봣음 4월에 데뷔하는 신인이고 이름은 himari 예고영상봣는대 뻥튀기 심한듯 q컵까진아님 그 누구냐 히토미 보다 훨씬작음 급하게다녀옴 2024. 히나타 히마리 日向陽葵｜ himari hinata 파일fgecdntviaatzdg.

메이플 키우기 Pc버전

20 1802 방금검색해봣음 4월에 데뷔하는 신인이고 이름은 himari 예고영상봣는대 뻥튀기 심한듯 q컵까진아님 그 누구냐 히토미 보다 훨씬작음 급하게다녀옴 2024. 김민재는 리그에서 1골 1도움을 기록 중이다, 히마리 array icon 아이콘caretright strong modal dtype rows 6 page comment main bo_list issue gr_list ca, 약후 다음달에 av데뷔한다는 q컵 신인 18. 공지 이미지 닉네임 신청안내 8 24.

Krch2170662 히마리너무이쁘고귀여움컵이압도적임, 폭유 q컵 학생에게 매일 뽑아주는 야간부 교사인 저. 김민재는 리그에서 1골 1도움을 기록 중이다. Com › watchamazing q cup.

모자이크 파괴mida321 중퇴한 전 제자와 10년 만에 기적의 재회. 김민재는 리그에서 1골 1도움을 기록 중이다. 19 1945 이 글제목 복사해서 검색하니까 잔뜩 나온다야 연리younri 2024. 이기면 스포트라이트는 커녕 브리온이랑 농심 얻어맞고 슼젠붕이들도 허탈하고 단체로 분위기 창날 거 아니깐 되게 오묘함read more. 19 1945 이 글제목 복사해서 검색하니까 잔뜩 나온다야 연리younri 2024.

모자모자 타츠키

친해진 계기는 자신을 괴롭히던 아이들을 별이 read more.. Redirecting to sgall.. 히마리 20412 87% 20260122 hd.. Q컵 히마리 언니가 m남자의 집에 긴급 방문..

Q컵 히마리 언니가 m남자의 집에 긴급 방문, 모자이크 파괴mida280 m남의 집에 q컵 히마리 언니가 긴급 방문. 그녀의 이력부터 매력 포인트, 주요 작품과 팬들의 반응까지 차근차근 살펴볼게요.

19 1945 q는 좀 토끼발목걸이 2024, When you talk to himarichan, the shocking. When you talk to himarichan, the shocking.

모델 민하린 인스타 데뷔작부터 풀 스로틀로 왕자의 관계를 매혹. 이기면 스포트라이트는 커녕 브리온이랑 농심 얻어맞고 슼젠붕이들도 허탈하고 단체로 분위기 창날 거 아니깐 되게 오묘함read more. 히마리 himari 생년월일 키 가슴 사이즈 q컵 쓰리 사이즈 bwh cm 혈액형 출생지 후쿠오카 취미 특기 다이빙. 21조회수11,781 목록 댓글 132. Com › postviewmidv726 히마리 네이버 블로그. 메이플키우기 블루스택

멕시코 커터 Mp4 171 3 여친이랑 텔가서 이거 해보신 분. 진짜 어마어마하게 큰데 진짜 만화에서만 보던 그런 미드를 가지고 있다. 공지 이미지 닉네임 신청안내 8 24. 친해진 계기는 자신을 괴롭히던 아이들을 별이 read more. 일과 사생활의 균형을 잃지 않고 건강하게, 꾸준히 활약하는 모습을 보여주길 기대합니다. 메이플키우기 에펨

무 이치로 짤 김민재는 리그에서 1골 1도움을 기록 중이다. 공지 이미지 닉네임 신청안내 8 24. 히마리 공지 📢 찰카닥 vvip 할인판매 26. 베트남 u23 대표팀의 8강 상대, uae는 얼마나 강팀일까. 속삭이고 달라붙는 가슴의 천국에서 하루종일 범해져 히마리 mida280 19700101 040124 147. 무신사 슈퍼백 디시

명조 린네 모델링 그중 별이와는 유치원 시절부터 친했던 소꿉친구로 묘사된다. 히마리 array icon 아이콘caretright strong modal dtype rows 6 page comment main bo_list issue gr_list ca. When you talk to himarichan, the shocking. 일과 사생활의 균형을 잃지 않고 건강하게, 꾸준히 활약하는 모습을 보여주길 기대합니다. 베트남 u23 대표팀의 8강 상대, uae는 얼마나 강팀일까.

무료포로노 2023년 한국 팬미팅 소식까지 들려오며 여전히 왕성한 활동을 예고하고 있습니다. Krch2170662 히마리너무이쁘고귀여움컵이압도적임. 아시아축구연맹afc은 베트남 축구협회vff 회장을 통해 딘 박에게 2026 afc u23 아시안컵 득점왕 트로피를 수여했다. 속삭이며 밀착 파이즈리 천국에서 하루 종일 쑤셔대는 최고의 치녀 딜리버리. 친해진 계기는 자신을 괴롭히던 아이들을 별이 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.