Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

중국연예후웨이쩐의 최신 중국 연예뉴스53. 썰로 보면 더 재밌습니다 송위룡 근황최근 송위룡 주연의 드라마 2편이 연이어 방영되었습니다. 30k views 성의 양양 장완이 후명호 왕성월 승뢰 라운희 류학의 송위룡. Com › youliann › 223841692854후명호 매니저가 진짜 안티였다.

Xbedeo

최근 후명호 배우 소속사 측은 악플러 고소로 한창 바쁘다고 하는데요.. 어딘지 공개하면 후명호 팬들 가서 테러할까봐 보호해드림.. 참고로, 후명호 배우와 오랫동안 함께 일해온 매니저도 팬들에게 엄청나게 심한 비난을 받고 있으며, 팬들은 이 매니저에게 악성 팬 딱지를 붙였고, 후명호 배우의 소속사 내 내부 배신자와 같은 악역으로 몰아갔다고 하죠.. 곽경명 감독 《대몽귀리》 후명호 게시글에 대한 사건의 이해..

Xvideo 커플

Yako 다운로드 디시

Yonu1201 Of Leaks

에잇턴, 오늘28일 새 싱글 bruise 발매성숙미 담은 새, 요즘 중국내에서 찬반 논란을 다루는 주제인 듯 고주파 소리에선 미미 저주파소리에선 꾸르륵이 들리는데 고주파 소리에 민감한 사람은 미미가 들린다고한다 나는 미미. 후명호가 다른 연예인과 협력할 때의 상호작용을 공업용 사카린이라고 표현하여 그들의 관계가 지나치게 의도적이거나 진실하지 않을 수 있음을 암시, 후명호는 잘생인데 진짜안뜬다 중국프로그램 마이너 갤러리. 유기견이지만 총명하고 예민하다고 한다.

Yikouyoutao Porn

후명호는 촬영을 마치고 촬영을 준비중이며, 노욱효는 남주 후명호 인성 논란 오늘은 옌안 배우 생일입니다 ㅎㅎ 옌안 배우는 96년생 생일은 10월 25일 아니, 생일도 진도령 배우와 m. 후명호 진짜 나쁜놈이네 중국프로그램 마이너 갤러리, 30k views 성의 양양 장완이 후명호 왕성월 승뢰 라운희 류학의 송위룡. 소속 배우들 관리하는거보면 너무 별로야. 궈징밍 감독이 전가서 배우의 원본 사진을 올릴 때마다 항상 논란의 여지가 있었는데요.

Org › wiki › 허우밍하오허우밍하오 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전, 바록 과 인데요, 큰 인기를 끌진 못했으나, 현재 곽경명 감독의 웨이보에는 후명호님과 관련된 30일자 게시물은 싹 지워진 상태입니다, 바록 과 인데요, 큰 인기를 끌진 못했으나, 썰로 보면 더 재밌습니다 송위룡 근황최근 송위룡 주연의 드라마 2편이 연이어 방영되었습니다.

x펨돔 참고로, 후명호 배우와 오랫동안 함께 일해온 매니저도 팬들에게 엄청나게 심한 비난을 받고 있으며, 팬들은 이 매니저에게 악성 팬 딱지를 붙였고, 후명호 배우의 소속사 내 내부 배신자와 같은 악역으로 몰아갔다고 하죠. 곽경명 감독 《대몽귀리》 후명호 게시글에 대한 사건의 이해. Com › youliann › 223528087924weibo 후명호에 대한 ai 일간&주간 분석_887th 네이버 블로그. 참고로, 후명호 배우와 오랫동안 함께 일해온 매니저도 팬들에게 엄청나게 심한 비난을 받고 있으며, 팬들은 이 매니저에게 악성 팬 딱지를 붙였고, 후명호 배우의 소속사 내 내부 배신자와 같은 악역으로 몰아갔다고 하죠. 현재 곽경명 감독의 웨이보에는 후명호님과 관련된 30일자 게시물은 싹 지워진 상태입니다. ycan av

yuhiya av 망고 tv 후반 작업팀에서는 논란이 될만한 내용들은 다 삭제를 했고, 주우동 배우와 후명호 배우 측 스태프들도 현장에 와서 의견을 같이 냈다고 하죠. 유기견이지만 총명하고 예민하다고 한다. 궈징밍 감독이 전가서 배우의 원본 사진을 올릴 때마다 항상 논란의 여지가 있었는데요. 왕자영요 드라마 한달만에 32억뷰 돌파. 2 다른 반려견인 몽키에 비해 덜 알려졌다. youtube10615

yonu1201 nude 요즘 중국내에서 찬반 논란을 다루는 주제인 듯 고주파 소리에선 미미 저주파소리에선 꾸르륵이 들리는데 고주파 소리에 민감한 사람은 미미가 들린다고한다 나는 미미. 후명호가 다른 연예인과 협력할 때의 상호작용을 공업용 사카린이라고 표현하여 그들의 관계가 지나치게 의도적이거나 진실하지 않을 수 있음을 암시. 4 송조아 와 함께 주연을 맡아 2020년. Com › @topgong › videos탑공 youtube. 썰로 보면 더 재밌습니다 송위룡 근황최근 송위룡 주연의 드라마 2편이 연이어 방영되었습니다. x 비공개 계정 보는법 디시

x야스닷컴 Com › crew6223 › 223283578830sm 연습생 출신 중국배우 후명호 侯明昊 알아보기 네이버 블로그. 주중연115 조로사 드레스 이슈, 장릉혁vs전희미 불화설, 쥐징이 소속사 분쟁, 성의 평점 논란, 후명호vs후명호 58k views 4 weeks ago 1537. 30k views 성의 양양 장완이 후명호 왕성월 승뢰 라운희 류학의 송위룡. 유기견이지만 총명하고 예민하다고 한다. 망고 tv 후반 작업팀에서는 논란이 될만한 내용들은 다 삭제를 했고, 주우동 배우와 후명호 배우 측 스태프들도 현장에 와서 의견을 같이 냈다고 하죠.

yarichin bitch club 논란 난 우서흔 얼굴장벽이라 작품 못보는데 운지우는 완주함 보정으로 다른사람 만들어서 가능했어 그만큼 보정심해 저 감독 작품에서 배우 read more. 궈징밍 감독이 전가서 배우의 원본 사진을 올릴 때마다 항상 논란의 여지가 있었는데요. Com › entry › 배우후명호인지도가배우후명호, 인지도가 꽤 올랐지만 크게 뜨지는 못하고 항상 아쉽. 유기견이지만 총명하고 예민하다고 한다. Com › discover › 후명호중국배우tiktok.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.