Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

오로지 혼자 작업하는 일인만큼 일을 혼자하는 직업임이 확실하죠. 혼자 버리기 어려운 물건을 대신 버려보세요. 회사 사람들은 좋은데, 그냥 이제는 혼자 있고 싶고, 사람 안 만나고 혼자 조용히 살고 싶어요 가장 먼저 떠오르는 건 농사고, 카페 같은 가게일은 손님 대하고 해야 해서 싫고, 프리랜서 일도 인간 관계를 유지해야 할 거 같아서 쉽지 않아 보여요. 혼자 일하는 시설관리 추천좀 부탁한다 자격증 갤러리.

설렘한스푼 디시

설하얀 Asmr

새나 팬트리 디시

2013년 20살때 10개국 30개 도시 다녀왔고내가 느낀건 극히 주관적인 것이기 때문에 그냥 이 사람은 이렇게 느꼈구나정도로만 봐줬으면 좋겠슴다영국 런던 여행자들 많아서 그런지 별 헤코지는 안하지만 밤에 숙소 근. 등대쪽이나 외지쪽에서 혼자하는일 드문드문 있다지만 너무. 참고로 로너건의 마지막 공식경기 출전은 2020년 12월 24일 스토크시티 소속으로 토트넘과의 리그컵 경기를 뛴 것임.

다 큰 성인이 혼자서 6개월 만에 영어공부 성공하는 3가지 방법. 생각나는거라고는 디자인 계통 프리랜서나 전업작가 정도인데 내가 예술쪽 재능이 없음ㅎ, Skwin 디시 새로운 아이디어와 접근법 톱 5 비교. 취업 갤러리 이용안내 혼자살면 한달 150만원만 벌어도 충분히 먹고산다 37살 노총각 퇴물49, 일을 혼자 한다면 그 누구에게도 간섭받지 않아도 되고, 인간관계에 스트레스를 받지 않아도 된다는 장점이 있습니다.

오로지 혼자 작업하는 일인만큼 일을 혼자하는 직업임이 확실하죠.. 한마디로 너무 쉽거나 너무 어렵거나 하는 과목으로만 이루어져 있어서 1학년 때 학업 성취를 아예 못느껴서 회의감을 느끼게 되는 학생들이 이 부류에 해당하는데 신학기가 될 때마다 이런 학생들이 의외로 많다.. 갈 곳도 없고 집에만 있어 심심하다면 혼자, 혹은 친구들과 재미있는 활동들을 해보자..

이디야 알바, 난이도, 외모, 후기, 남자, 더쿠, 디시, 디시, 혼자, 월급 현실주의 1. Skwin 디시 새로운 아이디어와 접근법 톱 5 비교. Com › dhehan270 › 222461746421나는 혼자가편하다.

선코밍 유출

이디야 알바 지원 방법과 지원 자격 4. 어쩌랴 일에는 순서가 있으니 지금은 남편 병 간호가 1번이다. 이더 리움 안 오르는 이유 디시혼자 할만한 게임 디시.

날이 밝으면 오늘은 깍두기와 파김치 물김치를 담고 반찬도 몇가지 해야한다. Com › board › view진심 혼자하는 직업 머머 있냐, 한마디로 너무 쉽거나 너무 어렵거나 하는 과목으로만 이루어져 있어서 1학년 때 학업 성취를 아예 못느껴서 회의감을 느끼게 되는 학생들이 이 부류에 해당하는데 신학기가 될 때마다 이런 학생들이 의외로 많다.

온라인 말고 솔플 가능한 게임 추천좀 스팀 게임류 같은거 마크 싱글모드 1년하니까 질림 dc official app, Com › mini › board혼자 생활하기 vs 친목 생활하기 둘 다 해보고 느낀점 공무원 현직. Kr › 혼자일하는직업추천혼자 일하는 직업 추천 best 5 인생이 바뀌는 1분, 생각나는거라고는 디자인 계통 프리랜서나 전업작가 정도인데 내가 예술쪽 재능이 없음ㅎ, 내 정신분열증 때문에 다른 사람들이랑 제대로 어울릴 수가 없어서, 이제 그만 노력해야 해, Cu에서는 직접 뽑는게 아니고 리쿠르팅 하는 회사에서 사람을 뽑고 꽂아준다.

상딸 디시 참고로 로너건의 마지막 공식경기 출전은 2020년 12월 24일 스토크시티 소속으로 토트넘과의 리그컵 경기를 뛴 것임. 15 @ c945f659 내꺼도 하긴 하고있는데 쇼핑몰 md라고 하는 애들은 100% 다 소속임 프리가 있을수가 없음 계약직은 몰라도 0. 집에서도 생산적일 수 있는 방법을 찾고자 하는 여러분에게 이 목록이 도움이 되기를 바랍니다. 집에서도 생산적일 수 있는 방법을 찾고자 하는 여러분에게 이 목록이 도움이 되기를 바랍니다. Kr › 혼자일하는직업추천혼자 일하는 직업 추천 best 5 인생이 바뀌는 1분. 성보극장 후기

서이브 겨드랑이 디시 Com › dhehan270 › 222461746421나는 혼자가편하다. 등대쪽이나 외지쪽에서 혼자하는일 드문드문 있다지만 너무. 회사 사람들은 좋은데, 그냥 이제는 혼자 있고 싶고, 사람 안 만나고 혼자 조용히 살고 싶어요 가장 먼저 떠오르는 건 농사고, 카페 같은 가게일은 손님 대하고 해야 해서 싫고, 프리랜서 일도 인간 관계를 유지해야 할 거 같아서 쉽지 않아 보여요. 번역가의 경우 채용됨에 있어 경력이 중요하긴 하지만, 고소득 직업인 편이기도 하고 정년이 딱히 없다보니 외국어에 능통하다면 한번쯤 생각해봐도 좋을 직업종류인 것 같습니다. Com › board › view진심 혼자하는 직업 머머 있냐. 설윤 썰

상딸 디시 내 정신분열증 때문에 다른 사람들이랑 제대로 어울릴 수가 없어서, 이제 그만 노력해야 해. 다 큰 성인이 혼자서 6개월 만에 영어공부 성공하는 3가지 방법. Net › 488873390혼자 일하는 거 좋아하면 무슨 직업이 맞을까 dogdrip. 갈 곳도 없고 집에만 있어 심심하다면 혼자, 혹은 친구들과 재미있는 활동들을 해보자. 다 큰 성인이 혼자서 6개월 만에 영어공부 성공하는 3가지 방법. 서안 스웨디시 야동

산고 디시 더 나은 세상을 위한 빼기의 한 걸음. Com › mgallery › board혼자서 일할수있는 노가다 직종 있음. 번역가의 경우 채용됨에 있어 경력이 중요하긴 하지만, 고소득 직업인 편이기도 하고 정년이 딱히 없다보니 외국어에 능통하다면 한번쯤 생각해봐도 좋을 직업종류인 것 같습니다. Joke3838입니다 도쿄 클럽 오픈채팅방도 운영하니 동행도 구하시고 조각도 구하시고 혼자 오셔도 여러 한국인과 같이 재밌게 놀수 있습니다. 아침에 출근하면 물류창고에 비워져 있던 물품들을 채우기 시작한다.

살로메 염상 등대쪽이나 외지쪽에서 혼자하는일 드문드문 있다지만 너무 특수직업들은 들어갈 루트가 너무 좁고. 이 가운데 절반 이상은 광주 지역에서 일할 의지를 보였지만. 당연스레 무리지어 다니다가 은근슬쩍 식단, 건강 핑계 대면서 점심 혼밥부터 시작하게 됐는데, 처음에는 좀 눈치보였음. Io › questions › 470507d4dc284b4ba717f6e280아하 ㅣ 궁금할 땐, 아하. 회사 사람들은 좋은데, 그냥 이제는 혼자 있고 싶고, 사람 안 만나고 혼자 조용히 살고 싶어요 가장 먼저 떠오르는 건 농사고, 카페 같은 가게일은 손님 대하고 해야 해서 싫고, 프리랜서 일도 인간 관계를 유지해야 할 거 같아서 쉽지 않아 보여요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.