Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › hotmango123 › 223942662832호치민 에코걸, 실제로 본 후기 네이버 블로그. Com › board › view호치민 에코걸 하루 시세가 60만 원. 가슴도 큰데 자연산에 얼굴도 수술 read more. 자 이제 본격적은 에코걸 후기 시작할게 우선 일정은 내가 편하게 잡을 수 있으니, 마일리지 좌석이 있는 비행기 날짜로 맞춰서 발권했어 3박4일 그리고 친구에게 추천받은 에코걸 상담 실장님과 며칠을 신나게 상담을 했지.

Fanzaero

뭐든 어디가나 유독 한국인들만 호갱되는 경우가 많다.. 마인드 모든것이 안따라와주니 한가라가 욕을 쳐먹는거임 가격이 좀 올라도 수질..

F95zone Unobtrusive

일반인이라고 하지만 니들 같이 호구남들 존나. 가슴도 큰데 자연산에 얼굴도 수술 read more. 전부 사기업체라고 보시면 됩니다 호치민 다낭 황제투어 에코걸 가이드, 자 이제 본격적은 에코걸 후기 시작할게 우선 일정은 내가 편하게 잡을 수 있으니, 마일리지 좌석이 있는 비행기 날짜로 맞춰서 발권했어 3박4일 그리고 친구에게 추천받은 에코걸 상담 실장님과 며칠을 신나게 상담을 했지.

호치민 에코걸과 함께하는 3박4일 패키지호치민 에코걸 투어 포함사항. 일반인은 작업해서 두어명 만나봤는데 정들어서 못하겠더라. 허나, 최근에는 여러 에코걸들의 태도 혹은 무리한 요구 등의 문제가 일어나면서, 호치민 에코걸을 별로 추천을 하지 않는 분위기입니다.

Fantia Yui

에코걸만의 다양한 매력 덕분에 많은 분들이 관심을 가지고 계시는데요, 오늘은 호치민 에코걸의 정의부터 업체, 예약, 가격, 프로필, 노는법 등 이용 해보기 전에는 알기 어려운 정보들을 모두 자세히 알아보도록 하겠습니다. 우선 가격은 숏 200만동, 롱 300만동 부르더라. 호치민 에코걸 아는사람 여행 마이너 갤러리. 가슴도 큰데 자연산에 얼굴도 수술 read more. 최근 가장 많은 사랑을 받고있는 호치민 에코걸 투어 패키지를 소개해드리고자 합니다.

에코걸부터 에스코트까지 필리핀, 베트남, 태국, 일본까지 다 모여있음. Info › post › 호치민에코걸투어호치민 에코걸 베스트 패키지. 낮엔 활기차고 역동적인 도시였다면, 밤엔 정서적인 위로를 건네는 도시였다. Info › post › hcmescort호치민 에코걸 총정리 업체, 예약, 가격, 프로필, 노는법 등, 쇼부는 자기 능력껏 하는거고 널린게 여자니까 그냥 넙죽 받아먹지 말고 거절할때는 거절하자, 호치민 에코걸 아는사람 여행 마이너 갤러리.

fc2 ppv stream 호치민 한가라 주대 및 문제점 베트남 문학 마이너 갤러리. 하노이는 베트남의 수도로 역사, 문화, 음식, 자연경관 등 다양한 매력을 갖춘 도시로 동남아 여행의 출발점으로도 불립니다. 호치민클럽중워킹걸많은데어디냐 베트남 마이너 갤러리. 옛날에 58번에서 봤었는데 그때 후기가 괜찮았거든. Com › board › view호치민 에코걸 하루 시세가 60만 원. fc2ppv2551759

fc2 경화수월 Com › post › hcmecogirl호치민 에코걸 총정리. 한국인 사장들이 현지에서 한국인들을 호갱 만들어 가며 지나친 폭리를 취하고 있다. 에코걸은 호치민을 안내해주며 여자친구와 같은 역할을 해주는 친구들입니다. 호치민 에코걸과 함께하는 3박4일 패키지호치민 에코걸 투어 포함사항. 물론 존나 이쁘면 질러도 상관없지 뭐2. fc23470313

f95zone school 에코걸부터 에스코트까지 필리핀, 베트남, 태국, 일본까지 다 모여있음. 이번에 55번으로 변경되서 예약했는데 오 진짜 잘하더라. Info › post › 호치민에코걸투어호치민 에코걸 베스트 패키지. 같은 시각 미국인은 풀패키지 300달러 줬다고 한다. 전부다 만족도 최상, 강력추천이라해서 더 거부감드네. fc2 anal

fc2 femdom Info › post › hcmescort호치민 에코걸 총정리 업체, 예약, 가격, 프로필, 노는법 등. 호치민 에코걸 아는사람 여행 마이너 갤러리. 네온사인과 음악, 사람들의 활기찬 목소리가 어우러지며, 단순한 여행지 이상의 매력을. 근데 지인이 그렇게 살아서는 뭔 낙이냐면서 나한테 신세계인 다낭 에코걸을 알려줌. 전부다 만족도 최상, 강력추천이라해서 더 거부감드네.

fc2 3126833 호치민 한가라 주대 및 문제점 베트남 문학 마이너 갤러리. Info › post › 호치민에코걸투어호치민 에코걸 베스트 패키지. 마인드 모든것이 안따라와주니 한가라가 욕을 쳐먹는거임 가격이 좀 올라도 수질. 아마 20주면 하루종일 같이 있을 듯. 아마 20주면 하루종일 같이 있을 듯.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.