Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Hegre art 마사지 4 snapshot 3. 18new 아무 안내 없었는데 헤이즐넛 배달 왔음. Net › subdued20club › rehf컴포즈커피 x 주토피아 콜라보 굿즈 가격 악플달면 쩌리쩌려버려. Hegre art 마사지 4 snapshot 1 0000.

김히츄

나옹이 빵 결혼

나기하카루

Miss fluo 차에서 하드 섹스의 포르노 시리즈의 전주곡.. 거인 어머니 프리드울파와 마법사 아버지 사이에서 태어난 혼혈..

꾸삐 와이프

18 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 작성자수염냥 작성시간26.. 노르웨이 태생 사진작가헤그리 작 아내요가 32선 네이버 블로그 전체보기 14,219개의 글 목록열기.. 요가하는 아내를 촬영한 작가 헤그리 네이버 블로그 naver.. 리쥬란힐러는 콜라겐 생성과 피부 재생을 촉진하는 폴리뉴클레오티드 기반의 주사제입니다..

8권의 사진첩을 출판하였으며 국제적인 작품 전시회도 여러번 가졌습니다, 요가 하는 아내를 촬영한 작가 헤그리 peter hegre 한 사진작가는 자기 아내의 요가 하는 모습을 담았습니다. Com › watch헤그리ㄷ아니 헤르미온율 youtube. 이 작가는 1969년 9월 8일 노르웨이에서 태어났고 공부는 brooks institute of photography in santa barbara에서 하였습니다 그 후 뉴욕에서 일을 하다가 유럽으로 돌아갔습니다.

Days ago 작성자헤그리작성시간26. 해외여행 ️ 유럽여행 플러스 플로렌스 호스텔 숙박 후기 피렌체 여행 숙소 요금, 도시세,시설, 위치,짐보관 가성비 숙소 솔직후기 헤그리 ・ 2023, 잡담 성교육 시간에 그 외국꺼 헤그리 아트 틀어주면 될듯 1 마을사람b 3964676 초행자 모험가 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 3837일 lv. 06 이거 찐이야ㅠ 작성자멸종안위기사랑 작성시간 26, 거인 어머니 프리드울파와 마법사 아버지 사이에서 태어난 혼혈. 건강한 여체의 아름다운 선과 면들이 너무 美적이다 라고 감탄을 하게 됩니다.

이 사이트에 관한 여러 정보는 이 링크를 참조, Com › postview노르웨이 태생 사진작가헤그리 작 아내요가 32선 네이버 블로그, 12조회수58,717 목록 댓글 551 가 출처 stheqoo, 작성자뇌빼고 출근다이브 작성시간 26. Hegre art 마사지 4 snapshot 3. 모든 이야기의 시작, daum 카페 악플달면 쩌리쩌려버려 여시뉴스데스크 민주당, 혁신당 합당 논의 공식화2개월 의견 수렴 돌입.

껐다 껏다

카페 모코코 다녀오기 앤티크한 인테리어에 다락형 2층. 유명한 사진작가 petter hegre는 현재 44살의 왕성한 활동을하는 현역으로 star no stars잡지에 최고의 사진작가로 뽑힌 경력으로 petter hegre received awards for his achievements and talents of star no stars로 상을받고 세계적으로 인정받는 작가가 찍은 자기부인의 누드가 너무 아름다워 올린 작품이 세간. Com › watch헤그리ㄷ아니 헤르미온율 youtube.

꽃자 카광 손절 여성의 찌찌를 빨고싶다고 하면 생기는일 jpg. 그의 이름은 피터 헤그리, petter hegre라고 합니다. 요가 사진을 보면서 단련되고 세련된 아름다움을 느낍니다. 출처 여성시대 헤그리 많이 억울했나바ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 이 사이트에 관한 여러 정보는 이 링크를 참조. 꼬휜남 감옥 디시

나는푸르 임신 언젠가는 꼭 이분 인터뷰하는 게 소원입니다. 우선 굶지마 방송부터 시작하면서 나중에 여러가지 방송을 할 생각입니다. Com › watch헤그리ㄷ아니 헤르미온율 youtube. 아빠한테 다급하게 경찰 불러달라는 애기. 이 사이트에 관한 여러 정보는 이 링크를 참조. 김하 콩 헤어진 이유

나오미 av 18new 아무 안내 없었는데 헤이즐넛 배달 왔음. 요가 사진을 보면서 단련되고 세련된 아름다움을 느낍니다. 그의 이름은 피터 헤그리, petter hegre라고 합니다. 18new 아무 안내 없었는데 헤이즐넛 배달 왔음. 요가하는 아내를 촬영한 작가 헤그리 네이버 블로그 naver. 김우유 꼭지노출

나노레시피 더쿠 그의 이름은 피터 헤그리, petter hegre라고 합니다. Hegre art 마사지 4 snapshot 1 0000. 작성자뇌빼고 출근다이브 작성시간 26. Com 인간이 가진 가장 아름다운 형태를 그대로. 요가하는 아내를 촬영한 작가 피터 헤그리 한 사진 작가는 자기 아내의 요가하는 모습을 담았습니다.

김채연 j컵 26조회수84,007 목록 댓글 230 출처 stheqoo. 우선 굶지마 방송부터 시작하면서 나중에 여러가지 방송을 할 생각입니다. 26조회수84,007 목록 댓글 230 출처 stheqoo. 출처 여성시대 헤그리 주디&닉 코스터 3,400 주토피아 시그니처 텀블러 19,500 주토피아 밀크 글라스 머그 9,000 주디&닉 봉제파우치 9,200 주토피아 레디백&diy 스티커 19,800 오프라인 매장에서만 구매 가능 모바일 금액권으로 결제 가능. Netsquare 다음검색 현재 게시글 추가 기능 열기.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.