Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

2022년 소속사를 바꾸면서 아라타 아리나로. 연하이지만 선배 여자 상사와 호텔에서 아이 방 미각의 유혹에 빠져 아침까지 미친 것처럼 야리 넘치는 바람기 성교 하시모토 아리나. 280k followers, 12 following, 14 posts 新ありな @arina_arata2 on instagram moodyz専属🌸 元 橋本ありな. Employee communication.

꽉 변호사 얼굴

김요 시 농구선수

총 337개 작품과 12개 레이블 활동, 평균 평점 5, 하시모토 아리나 arina hashimoto, 橋本ありな 1996년 12월 15일 167cm 845884 데뷔 16년 03월 늘. 4k 세로 하시모토 아리나 직캠arina hashimoto 橋本ありな. 하시모토 아리나 데뷔 인터뷰 신인시절을 보면 깨발랄한 케릭으로 데뷔를 한것 같은데 귀여운 미모의 소유자였던것 같습니다, 아라타 아리나의 베스트 작품 회원들이 뽑은 베스트 작품 입니다.

나유타 방귀

2022년 소속사를 바꾸면서 아라타 아리나로.. Com › omosirosou1 › 222379050197하시모토 아리나 arina hashimoto 추천작 프로필 네이버 블로그..

연하이지만 선배 여자 상사와 호텔에서 아이 방 미각의 유혹에 빠져 아침까지 미친 것처럼 야리 넘치는 바람기 성교 하시모토 아리나, B84 c컵 w58 h84 하시모토 아리나 라는 이름으로 데뷔, 아라타 아리나가 av 배우 은퇴를 선언했습니다. 아라타 아리나의 베스트 작품 회원들이 뽑은 베스트 작품 입니다.

나히아 최종화

그라비아 출신으로, 착에로 아이돌로 활동하다 2016년 s1에서 하시모토 아리나橋本ありな라는 이름으로 데뷔했다, Inspire employees with compelling live and ondemand video, 하시모토 아리나, 최근 품번ipzz079 2023년 04월 11일 출시 대표장르미소녀, 아슬모자이크, 슬림, vr전용, 1인칭 시점, 물총, 키스입술, 페라 총 작품수239. 橋本ありな 新ありな av 온라인 보기.

하시모토 아리나 하시모토아리나 생년월일 1996년 12월 15일 사이즈 b84 w56 h83 167cm 데뷔 2016년03월 데뷔작 s1 한줄평 처음 av동영상에 점점 눈에 트이고 있을때 av배우 같지않은 외모와 슬림한 몸매에 굉장히 자주 보며 찾아보고 하였습니다, 슬랜더계의 정점 하시모토 아리나 과거와 많이 달라지고 요즘 노잼이라는 소리를 듣지만 그래도 역시 하시모토 아리나 제휴 문의. Com › omosirosou1 › 222379050197하시모토 아리나 arina hashimoto 추천작 프로필 네이버 블로그.

아라타 아리나 하시모토 아리나 → 아라타 아리나, 아라타 아리나는 2024년 12월 21일 19시, 본인의 유튜브 계정에서 라이브를 통해 은퇴를 발표했으며 관련 내용은 다음과 같습니다. 하시모토 아리나의 최신작 & 프로필 hashimoto arina, 橋本. Com › pages › star하시모토 아리나 arina hashimoto 橋本ありな avppomppu. 기본 프로필 다른이름 본명 하시모토 아리나橋はし 本もと ありな, arina hashimoto 생년월일 만나이 1996년 12월 15일 26세 신장 167cm 신체사이즈 b84 w58 h84 cm 컵사이즈 c컵 데뷔 2016년 3월 데뷔 혈액형 a형.

꽉변호사 빨간약

제발 은퇴하지 말아줘 하시모토 아리나는 벌써 데뷔 7년의 중견 여배우이다. 일본 av hashimoto arina 컬렉션 보기. Activity originally from gravu. 프로필 이름 아라타 아리나 arina arata, 新ありな, 하시모토 아리나 arina hashimoto, 橋本あり, Followers, 5 following, 12 posts see instagram photos and videos from 新有菜fanclub @arina_hashimoto1215.

슬렌더 av 배우 아라타하시모토 아리나, 나카다시 해금. 280k followers, 12 following, 14 posts 新ありな @arina_arata2 on instagram moodyz専属🌸 元 橋本ありな. 여기는 모든 것이 무료인 최고의 섹스 튜브입니다 512 erina hashimoto 비디오 및 기타 다양한 콘텐츠 ahmovs.

까마귀는 반짝이는 것을 좋아해 만화 무료보기 Com › xyzinfo › 223042173924하시모토 아리나 arina hashimoto 橋本ありな 정보 모음 네이버. 아리나는 2025년 1년간 대략 1214개 정도의 작품을 공개할 예정이며, 12월에 발매되는 작품이 은퇴작이 될 것이라고 알려왔다. 하시모토 아리나 작품 바로보기 av배우. 기본 프로필 다른이름 본명 하시모토 아리나橋はし 本もと ありな, arina hashimoto 생년월일 만나이 1996년 12월 15일 26세 신장 167cm 신체사이즈 b84 w58 h84 cm 컵사이즈 c컵 데뷔 2016년 3월 데뷔 혈액형 a형. japanese former av actress. 김우유 민찬기

나 히아 ㅗㅜ ㅑ 아라타 아리나新あらたありな arina arata 2018년 딸롱도르 대상을 걸머쥔 에스원 4대 천왕 1. 프로필 이름 하시모토 아리나 arina hashimoto, 橋本ありな, 이와타니 시키岩谷志季, 아라타 아리. 슬랜더계의 정점 하시모토 아리나 과거와 많이 달라지고 요즘 노잼이라는 소리를 듣지만 그래도 역시 하시모토 아리나 제휴 문의. 신 아리나라는 이름에 걸맞게, 이적 후 작품들의 평이 아주 좋다. 橋本ありな 新ありな av 온라인 보기. 나는찬미 대학

나카모리 레이코 Jpg 이름 아리나 이이 arina ii 직업 성우, 배우, 인형사 출생 일본 요코하마 국적 소속 sue terry voices 활동 시기 2014년 현재 링크 파일홈페이지 아이콘. 새로운 아리나 하시모토 아리나 av 온라인 보기. 이전 이름에 굉장히 애착이 있던지라 은퇴도 고려했으나 지금은 아리나라는 이름은 지켜서 만족한다고 한다. 아리나는 2025년 1년간 대략 1214개 정도의 작품을 공개할 예정이며, 12월에 발매되는 작품이 은퇴작이 될 것이라고 알려왔다. 프롤로그 블로그 안부 일본어 → 한글 1,124개의 글 목록열기. 끝내 잡지 못한 사랑 8 화

나미시 디시 일본 av hashimoto arina 컬렉션 보기. Com › omosirosou1 › 222379050197하시모토 아리나 arina hashimoto 추천작 프로필 네이버 블로그. B84 c컵 w58 h84 하시모토 아리나 라는 이름으로 데뷔. Com › postview하시모토 아리나 arina hashimoto 추천작 프로필 네이버 블로그. 그라비아 출신으로, 착에로 아이돌로 활동하다 2016년 s1에서 하시모토 아리나橋本ありな라는 이름으로 데뷔했다.

나기 히카루 nude Hashimoto arina 橋本ありな. Followers, 5 following, 12 posts see instagram photos and videos from 新有菜fanclub @arina_hashimoto1215. Employee communication. 새로운 아리나 하시모토 아리나 av 온라인 보기. 2018년 dmm 어워드 여우주연상 수상.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.