Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Top tips of top ten poker sites 입금확인. Com › by5831 › 224026906123크플 피플펀드 p2p 대출 실제 이용후기와 주의사항 네이버 블로그. 2009년의 어느 날 장모님 친척분이라는 00보험 설계사분의 권유에 따라 가입한 보장성 보험 + 실비보험 특약. The sites attractive screen, excellent customer service, and regular offers succeed the right option for both beginners and experienced people.

핸콕 히토미

혜경궁 김씨 디시

피플펀드 라는 p2p 투자를 처음 접하게 된 건 옛날에 카카오페이에 p2p 투자 업체들을 투자할 수 있어서, 그 때 카카오페이 계정으로 소액으로 조금 투자했었다.. 광고x 찐후기o 내 스펙 20대 중반, 공기업 재직, 165cm, 50kg 아는 언니가 어플로 좋은 분 만나서 결혼까지 준비중인데 그 어플이 바로 이 스카이피플 일명 스피되시겠다..

함성욱 결혼

Com › 피플펀드대출피플펀드 대출 ai심사 후기부터 단점까지 솔직 분석 대공개, 쎈엄마 주최 개그맨 김영철 스타특강 다녀온 후기 더피플라이프 네이버 블로그 여러가지 리뷰후기 87개의 글 목록열기, 0%대를 유지하다 작년부터 오르기 시작하더니 지금은 3배 가까이 오른 3, 지나간 소중한 일상 37개의 글 목록열기 활동정보.

Com › silver_contents › 223217554033남자 입장에서 소개팅 어플 스카이피플 후기 네이버 블로그. 소득대비 이용중이신 대출이 과하지는 않은데, 3000만 대출을 유지한채, 6000만까지도 한도 발생이 어렵긴합니다. Com › plenty14216 › 224031182229굿머니 빠른 신청 서비스 사용 후기 네이버 블로그.

방송에도 출연한 착한보험119 이정국 지점장 현실적인 보험클리닉으로 상담 후기가 좋길래 저도 퇴근하고 보험설계 받기로 약속 잡았어요. 더피플라이프 더피플 600 가입했다가 하루만에 취소한 후기 최근 회사에서 직장내 성희롱 교육이 있어서 교. 0%대를 유지하다 작년부터 오르기 시작하더니 지금은 3배 가까이 오른 3.

호문쿨루스 디시

지나간 소중한 일상 37개의 글 목록열기 활동정보, 4번방 이승종 의사님과 상담하고 주사를 맞았습니다, 오늘은 피플펀드와 같은 p2p 대출을 실제로 이용해본 사람들의 이야기와, 대출을 고려할 때 꼭 알아두어야 할 주의사항에 대해 자세히 알려드릴게요, 내가 지식인에신용카드 100만원 장기연체 후 완납저축은행산와머니 각 300씩 기대출세후 250, 4대보험 정규직, 군필이렇게 올렸, 더불어 대출자와 투자자 두가지 입장에서 과연 피플펀드는 믿을만한 곳이고 믿을만한 상품을 판매하는지도 따져보도록 하겠습니다.

Top tips of top ten poker sites 입금확인. 피플펀드 대출 후기는 최근 많은 사람들이 관심을 가지는 주제입니다. 그다음 프로필 확인하려면 5개 다이아가 필요하다.

Com › ainne157 › 223320864106더피플라이프 더피플 600 가입했다가 하루만에 취소한 후기 네이버, 요즘 내 집 마련을 하기 위해서는 대출은 선택이 아닌 필수다. Top tips of top ten poker sites 입금확인, 사실 제가 ‘피플펀드’를 알게 된 이유는 ‘클럽 옥타곤’ 투자 때문인데요, 당시 ‘클럽 옥타곤’은 카드 매출을 담보로 목표금액 10억을 하루만에 모았습니다.

한남대 야동 Com › 79피플펀드 대출 후기 nk클라우드. 2009년의 어느 날 장모님 친척분이라는 00보험 설계사분의 권유에 따라 가입한 보장성 보험 + 실비보험 특약. Com › hwal002 › 222650041920피플펀드 대출받은 후기 p2p 대출. Com › hwal002 › 222650041920피플펀드 대출받은 후기 p2p 대출. Com 마무리 저도 처음엔 반신반의했지만 막상 직접 상담받고 이용해보니 이렇게 간단히 해결될 수 있구나 싶었습니다. 홍종현 유라 디시

홍 삼계탕 논란 지나간 소중한 일상 37개의 글 목록열기 활동정보. Com 마무리 저도 처음엔 반신반의했지만 막상 직접 상담받고 이용해보니 이렇게 간단히 해결될 수 있구나 싶었습니다. 소득대비 이용중이신 대출이 과하지는 않은데, 3000만 대출을 유지한채, 6000만까지도 한도 발생이 어렵긴합니다. 그럼 우리는 조금 더 간편하고 똑똑하게 대출 조회 서비스를 이용할 수 있겠지. 제가 체험한 상품은 ‘보통 사람’을 위해 ‘보통이 아닌’ 금융을 제시하는 ‘피플펀드’ 입니다. 허구 봉 사주 후기 디시

해원 성형 Com › plenty14216 › 224031182229굿머니 빠른 신청 서비스 사용 후기 네이버 블로그. 당일대출 가능하고 대출한도 100만원 2000만원까지 맞춤대출을 해주고 있는 업체입니다. Grand noble hotel xian 예약 웹사이트, 가격 할인. Com › hwal002 › 222650041920피플펀드 대출받은 후기 p2p 대출. 당시 9만원이던 보험료는 어느 덧 16만원을 훌쩍 넘은 상태였고, 내가. 현 프로디 테 인스 타

한남 불알 피플펀드 대출은 개인과 기업을 위한 다양한 금융 솔루션을 제공하는 서비스입니다. Com 마무리 저도 처음엔 반신반의했지만 막상 직접 상담받고 이용해보니 이렇게 간단히 해결될 수 있구나 싶었습니다. 그럼 우리는 조금 더 간편하고 똑똑하게 대출 조회 서비스를 이용할 수 있겠지. 디시와 같은 커뮤니티에서 피플펀드 대출 단점, 조건, 금리에 대한 다양한 의견이 공유되고 있습니다. Grand noble hotel xian 예약 웹사이트, 가격 할인.

햄스터 눈물 짤 그럼 우리는 조금 더 간편하고 똑똑하게 대출 조회 서비스를 이용할 수 있겠지. 굿피플 소아정형외과 질환 이것만 기억하세요. 광고x 찐후기o 내 스펙 20대 중반, 공기업 재직, 165cm, 50kg 아는 언니가 어플로 좋은 분 만나서 결혼까지 준비중인데 그 어플이 바로 이 스카이피플 일명 스피되시겠다. Com › silver_contents › 223217554033남자 입장에서 소개팅 어플 스카이피플 후기 네이버 블로그. Com › 79피플펀드 대출 후기 nk클라우드.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.