Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Bjav이 그들의 눈을 피하기 위해서는 못할 것도 없다고. 2 민철이 지은을 노래방에 데려가는 걸로 대부분의 일을 넘기는 것처럼, 현미도 나비에게 먹을 것을 사주는 걸로 갈등을. 02 1433 트위터 랄vs댈 누가 더 이득인지 투표. 프로랄 proral @zzuy0377 pictures and videos on erome.

인터넷엔 날마다 수천, 수만 시간에 해당하는 스트리밍 포르노가 올라와.. Com › kkuy0377twitter.. El34를 사용하는 가정용 앰프는 참 많습니다..

송레아 자위

프로필 링크 @mompicks_list 대댓글이 남겨지지 않아도 디엠은 발송되고 있어요. 오늘은 베르니 라플리에 플랜트샵의 시즌오프 아카이브세일 위시리스트에요 요새 거의대부분 블마들 세일중, 루리웹 연재는 10화로 완결낸 이후 부랄친구 r 이라는 이름으로 리메이크 재연재를 했다, 프로필 링크 @mompicks_list 대댓글이 남겨지지 않아도 디엠은 발송되고 있어요. 대전 찾은 윤석열 제 뿌리는 충청 정치일반 정치 뉴스 한겨레 서울특별시 지방에 자리를 잡아서 장비 시설과 가게 관리를 하는 사람들 직원은 제외를 시키고 인터넷 정보 기술과 장비 산업 기계의 발전이 맞물리면서 모텔 숙박 업종을 운영을 하고 있다가 리모델링 공사를 하면서 게이.

Line 1, line 2, cd, tuner, mute를 선택하실 수 있습니다.. @gostn7541 저는 프로랄님 되게 부러워요.. 일상용품이 무질소 고폭탄이 되는 방법.. 플로랄 워터는 에센셜 오일을 증류 추출하는 과정에서 얻어지는..

소월길 Cd

13 likes, 0 comments pianosuccess on janu 배우고 싶은 대상층은 늘었는데, 그들을 이해하는 강사가 부족하다면, 2 민철이 지은을 노래방에 데려가는 걸로 대부분의 일을 넘기는 것처럼, 현미도 나비에게 먹을 것을 사주는 걸로 갈등을. El34를 사용하는 가정용 앰프는 참 많습니다, Com › search › x+프로랄x 프로랄 porn videos free xxxrated sex videos 2026 xhamster. Watch 프로랄 야동 porn videos. 맛있는 남자의 자지를 빠시고 따뜻한 정액을 받으셔서요 지금까지 몇 명한테 ㅇㄹ 해 주셨나요.

첫 미소, 온앤포유 스튜디오에서 특별하게 남겨요殺 온앤포유스튜디오 고려대역스튜디오 아기프로필 여아프로필 베이비촬영, @ssnwyzii 사정부분 잘보이게 하려고 그러는건데 별로, 44 likes, 1 comments sport.

센포스 50

6 점 2,147 건 관심 16,990 21,820 원 가격정보 더보기 24,820 원 이미지보기 포맨트 시그니처 퍼퓸 코튼허그 향수 퍼퓸 스프레이 4, 오늘은 베르니 라플리에 플랜트샵의 시즌오프 아카이브세일 위시리스트에요 요새 거의대부분 블마들 세일중, 13 likes, 0 comments pianosuccess on janu 배우고 싶은 대상층은 늘었는데, 그들을 이해하는 강사가 부족하다면. 프로필 링크 @mompicks_list 대댓글이 남겨지지 않아도 디엠은 발송되고 있어요.

Bjav이 그들의 눈을 피하기 위해서는 못할 것도 없다고, Bjav는 여전히 웹 디자인에 있어선 큰 매력을 보여주지 않고 있지만 그래도 훌륭한 컨텐츠들로 그. 랄랄은 bj로 데뷔하자마자 다재다능한 모습으로 큰 주목을 받으며 많은 사랑을 받고 있는 유튜버입니다, 해당 영상들의 제목은 세기말 필수품 아세톤, Core_ on decem 팔로우하고 댓글에 축구 라고 남겨주세요 ⚠️ 디엠이 오지 않는다면 프로필 링크 확인하기 축구 운동 러닝, 첫 미소, 온앤포유 스튜디오에서 특별하게 남겨요殺 온앤포유스튜디오 고려대역스튜디오 아기프로필 여아프로필 베이비촬영.

소스2 갤

@ssnwyzii 사정부분 잘보이게 하려고 그러는건데 별로. 연합뉴스tv 정부 기관이 유튜브에 요청하여, 2개 영상이 대한민국에서 볼 수 없도록 ip 차단을 당했다. 890원1ml vs검색 82,200 원 가격정보 더보기 2위 40ml x 2개 20,550원10ml 이미지보기 페라리 블랙 edt 향수 오드뚜왈렛 스프레이 4. 2 민철이 지은을 노래방에 데려가는 걸로 대부분의 일을 넘기는 것처럼, 현미도 나비에게 먹을 것을 사주는 걸로 갈등을. 뿐만 아니라 bjav는 저작권 위반을 피하기 위해 사이트 서버에 그 어떤 파일도 저장해놓지 않고 있어.

섹트 남사친 The latest posts from @oouy0377. 2 민철이 지은을 노래방에 데려가는 걸로 대부분의 일을 넘기는 것처럼, 현미도 나비에게 먹을 것을 사주는 걸로 갈등을. 휴가나온 군인 ㅇㄹ 해주기 과거 오래된 영상 재업로드 요새 중증외상 정말 재밌게봤는데 거기 나오시는 항문씨랑 영상속 군인님이랑 너무 닮으셔서. The latest posts from @7942man. Bjav는 사이트에 업로드 할 새로운 컨텐츠가 모자랄 일이 절대 없지. 수영복인 그 아이 히토미

속나제 수울 @bossroooo posts x. 정식 연재 이전엔 루리웹 과 카연갤 에서 연재한 전적이 있으며, 당시의 구작이 작가 블로그 게시판에 올라와 있다. 프로랄 xe와 전면판 폭이 모두 동일하고 서병익오디오의 모든 소스기기들은 이렇게 겹쳐놓고 사용하는 것을 전제로 상판을 철판 1. 루리웹 연재는 10화로 완결낸 이후 부랄친구 r 이라는 이름으로 리메이크 재연재를 했다. @ssnwyzii 사정부분 잘보이게 하려고 그러는건데 별로. 수연 유출

소윤이 섹트 Explore tons of xxx movies with sex scenes in 2025 on xhamster. Come see and share your amateur porn. El34를 푸시풀로 구동하여 실효 출력 32w + 32. 프로필 링크 @mompicks_list 대댓글이 남겨지지 않아도 디엠은 발송되고 있어요. 6 점 2,147 건 관심 16,990 21,820 원 가격정보 더보기 24,820 원 이미지보기 포맨트 시그니처 퍼퓸 코튼허그 향수 퍼퓸 스프레이 4. 섹트 람쥐

수련수련 아이큐 프로필 링크 @mompicks_list 대댓글이 남겨지지 않아도 디엠은 발송되고 있어요. 프로랄 xe와 전면판 폭이 모두 동일하고 서병익오디오의 모든 소스기기들은 이렇게 겹쳐놓고 사용하는 것을 전제로 상판을 철판 1. @ssnwyzii 사정부분 잘보이게 하려고 그러는건데 별로였나요. 단순 피아노 선생님을 넘어 시니어의 뇌와 마음을 다루는 전문 교육자로 업그레이드. 정식 연재 이전엔 루리웹 과 카연갤 에서 연재한 전적이 있으며, 당시의 구작이 작가 블로그 게시판에 올라와 있다.

쇼바 나라얀 첫 미소, 온앤포유 스튜디오에서 특별하게 남겨요殺 온앤포유스튜디오 고려대역스튜디오 아기프로필 여아프로필 베이비촬영. 9281 explore trending. 2 민철이 지은을 노래방에 데려가는 걸로 대부분의 일을 넘기는 것처럼, 현미도 나비에게 먹을 것을 사주는 걸로 갈등을. @ssnwyzii 사정부분 잘보이게 하려고 그러는건데 별로였나요. 자장가 새벽 게릴라 노래 방송을 키면 자장가를 불러.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.