Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

우리나라 시골에서 아주 흔하게 사용되는 농약이다. 11 2313 바다표범 용광로인가요 ㄷㄷㄷ. Com › 8093505261동덕여대 에타 글 퍼나르는 사람들 이제 큰일남 ㄷㄷㄷ. 25% 원소전, 영웅기 주석194년 원소군과 맞선 장연군.

Yukkurina Nude

10 1622 곤작 크로노크로스가 미갤에서 포도팔이글 오지게 씀 ㅇㅇ 그래서 빡쳐서 저격당함 1 곤작 2020.. 11 2313 바다표범 용광로인가요 ㄷㄷㄷ.. 26 38 공지 2026년 01월 26일 자로 규정이 개정 되었습니다..

26 38 공지 2026년 01월 26일 자로 규정이 개정 되었습니다. 충칭스빠우重慶時報온바오 등 중국 매체의 5일 보도에 따르면. 10 1621 니엉덩이더러워 뭔일이길래 이렇게 싸워 니엉덩이더러워 2020. 레모투스 1100마력인가 그렇던데 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 펨코는 념글컷이 너무낮고 미갤은 듣보가 너무많음.

플옵이목표인팀팬 미스터리공포 갤 은근 유익한 잡지식글 많음, 우리나라 시골에서 아주 흔하게 사용되는 농약이다. 01 0147 저거 미갤이 시발 무서운거 올리면 비추 테러 당해서 그럼. 03 1548 펨코 얘기면 미갤 신무형의터치강의 2024. ㅈ간 이전에 ㅈ개구리밥이 있었닼ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 반지성주의자들이 요즘 왜 이렇게 많은지 모르겠네 얘.

짠맛이 강해서 단독으로 먹기보다는 밥반찬 혹은 술안주임, 어머니에게 우리 돈 100원을 훔쳤다고 의심을 받던 6살짜리 중국 여자 아이가 결백을 입증한다며 자신의 새끼 손가락을 자른 사건이 발생했다. 펨코는 념글컷이 너무낮고 미갤은 듣보가 너무많음. 🔋 에코프로 형제, 로봇 훈풍타고 개떡상시총 50조 육박 📈. 우리나라 시골에서 아주 흔하게 사용되는 농약이다.

きいう Hitomi

11 2313 바다표범 용광로인가요 ㄷㄷㄷ. 에코프로 형제, 로봇 훈풍타고 개떡상시총 50조 육박 2차전지의 시간이 돌아왔다. 내가 펨코미갤에서 본 꿈얘기중 가장 무서웠던건 이거임 ㅋㅋ, 우리나라 시골에서 아주 흔하게 사용되는 농약이다. 치악산은 중학교때 보이스카웃 이후로 처음이었고 바위가 많다는 정도만 알고 있었다.

10 1621 니엉덩이더러워 뭔일이길래 이렇게 싸워 니엉덩이더러워 2020.. 독성이 매우 강하여 자살을 기도하는 사람들이 음독하는 사고가 자주 발생한다밥숟가락 한스푼20cc만 먹어도 치사율 100%이며굉장히 고통스럽게 죽어간다.. 11 2204 torukia9 저를 지켜주셔서 대단히 감사합니다 댓글로 가기 30 best 한울리카 2024.. 11 2312 한화샌박v5 감사합니다 best 바다표범 2024..

22 1720 대한민국지식의보고goat에 대퓨님 왜 뜨나 했더만. 이거보인다면기분탓임 후타나리수술 ㄷㄷ. 03 1549 펨코미갤 디씨 싱벙갤 이런곳 윈터해린 2024.

카운터사이드 자막 폰트

Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. Com › 8093505261동덕여대 에타 글 퍼나르는 사람들 이제 큰일남 ㄷㄷㄷ, 11 2313 바다표범 용광로인가요 ㄷㄷㄷ, 하 슼갈 십련들이 결국 펨코미져도 망치려 들구나. 치악산은 중학교때 보이스카웃 이후로 처음이었고 바위가 많다는 정도만 알고 있었다.

04 1422 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ sd55as 2025, Com › 3719566559저거 미갤이 시발 무서운거 올리면 비추 테러 당해서 그럼 아프리카, 짠맛이 강해서 단독으로 먹기보다는 밥반찬 혹은 술안주임. 11 2204 torukia9 저를 지켜주셔서 대단히 감사합니다 댓글로 가기 30 best 한울리카 2024. 11 2204 torukia9 저를 지켜주셔서 대단히 감사합니다.

ㄷㅇㅎㅅㄹ 03 1548 펨코 얘기면 미갤 신무형의터치강의 2024. 11 2204 torukia9 저를 지켜주셔서 대단히 감사합니다 댓글로 가기 30 best 한울리카 2024. 펨코는 념글컷이 너무낮고 미갤은 듣보가 너무많음. 11 2145 데노코사이쿤 그렇게 될 것입니다 댓글로 가기 28 테레스 2024. 하룻밤에 똑같은 악몽 4번 연달아 꿈. yumi_03 leak

エンジェリックカズン hitomi 한국고대사에 대한 글을 써보고자 합니다. 댓글로 가기 70 best 바다표범 2024. Com › 3719566559저거 미갤이 시발 무서운거 올리면 비추 테러 당해서 그럼 아프리카. 5% 포훈전192년 계교전투의 공손찬군. 치악산은 중학교때 보이스카웃 이후로 처음이었고 바위가 많다는 정도만 알고 있었다. 브레인 롯 훔치기 이벤트 시간

※藻梨特典有【野外露出sex】プライベートビーチで連続デカ尻ロングストローク‼︎『イギだくない゛ｯイグｯイグイグぅｯｯｯうぅ゛ｯ』人に見られてオホ声痙攣イキ‼︎ 🔋 에코프로 형제, 로봇 훈풍타고 개떡상시총 50조 육박 📈. 공지 필독미스터리공포 갤러리 공지사항 26. 와이프가 외국인이라 한국어 조금씩 가르쳐주는데. 공지 필독미스터리공포 갤러리 공지사항 26. Net › 456099289펨코는 그래도 서브게시판이 꽤 활성화 되어 있더라 dogdrip. yummy707 video

オホ声 pikpak 11 2204 torukia9 저를 지켜주셔서 대단히 감사합니다. 2026 제네시스 x 스콜피오 컨셉트 ㄷㄷ. 01 0147 저거 미갤이 시발 무서운거 올리면 비추 테러 당해서 그럼. Com › best › 8093505261동덕여대 에타 글 퍼나르는 사람들 이제 큰일남 ㄷㄷㄷ. 입이 3개인 남성 공포미스테리 와이고수 출처펨코미갤.

てらす hitomi 11 2204 torukia9 저를 지켜주셔서 대단히 감사합니다 댓글로 가기 30 best 한울리카 2024. 어머니에게 우리 돈 100원을 훔쳤다고 의심을 받던 6살짜리 중국 여자 아이가 결백을 입증한다며 자신의 새끼 손가락을 자른 사건이 발생했다. 펨코랑 미갤 노잼인 이유 스트리머 갤러리. 여기도 태초에 태초 거슬러올라가면 펨코미갤처럼 정상적인 수준에 다양한 갤러리였다. 30명 정도의 인원이었고 스쿨 버스를 35만원 주고 대절해서 갔다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.