K팝 최초 빅토리아 시크릿 무대, 트와이스 지효 빅시 메이크업 궁금해.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Watch short videos about jihyos victorias secret trend from people around the world. 이날 무대에는 나연, 지효, 쯔위, 모모가 참여했습니다. 트와이스는 15일현지시각 미국 뉴욕 브루클린에서 열린 빅토리아 시크릿 패션쇼 2025에 참석했다. Com › dokachu79 › 224044861830빅시 2025 ‘class of pink’에서 빛난 트와이스 네이버 블로그.

빅토리아 시크릿 광고 찍은 트와이스 귀엽다.

잡담 ㅈㅁㅁㅇ 빅시 밤쉘 로션이랑 다니엘어쩌고 밤쉘 향수랑 비슷한 향이야.

무명의 더쿠 20251016 124837.. 이슈 멤들 다 예뻤던 트와이스 빅시쇼 89,726 496 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.. 그기다 올해는 케데몬으로 덕좀 많이 받고..

빅시쇼에서 트와이스 쯔위가 사과한 이유.

앞으로도 kpop 걸그룹이 패션과 음악을 결합한 글로벌 무대에서 활약하는 모습을 기대하게 됩니다, 당연히 9명 다 나오는 줄 알았는데 봐도봐도 4명밖에 없더라고ㅠ 9명이서 무대 씹어먹었어도 재밌었을텐데 그럼 모델들이 움직일 자리는 없었을 것 같기도 하고ㅠㅜ 암튼 read more. 다들 21세기 2026년 맞냐고 충격받고 있는 뉴스 아프가니스탄 교육부. 빅시쇼에서 트와이스 쯔위가 사과한 이유.

16 0914 ㅇㅎ빅시 출연한 트와이스 근황 멈출수없는힙 조회 수 574508 추천 수 399 댓글 432 s. 저번에 빅시쇼 나간거 흥해가지고 정식으로 콜라보 한듯, 다들 21세기 2026년 맞냐고 충격받고 있는 뉴스 아프가니스탄 교육부.

약후 트와이스 쯔위가 빅토리아 시크릿 무대에서 착용한.

이번 빅시쇼에 왜 4명만 나온건지 아는 덬들은 없지, 19 1852 그 브라탑 같은거 쯔위가 입은거 목록 스크랩 0 공유. 공지가 길다면 한번씩 눌러서 읽어주시면 됩니다, Com › 175kpop 런웨이 점령.

K팝 최초 빅토리아 시크릿 무대, 트와이스 지효 빅시 메이크업 궁금해. 남자답지만 평소에 웃을때 귀엽게 웃는 사람 2. 크롭탑과 스웨트팬츠를 활용한 의상은 빅.

무명의 더쿠 20251016 124926. ☞466덬 ☞467덬 남자 속옷 광고한답시고 팬티만 입고 나오는 거 봤어, Osen김채연 기자 트와이스가 ‘빅시쇼’를 뜨겁게 달궜다.

이슈 2025 빅토리아 시크릿 패션쇼 트와이스 풀공연.

— 트와이스 twice 빅시 무대 장악, 나연 지효. 포텐 터짐 최신순 유머움짤이슈 움짤 2025. Com › dokachu79 › 224044861830빅시 2025 ‘class of pink’에서 빛난 트와이스 네이버 블로그. 이슈 2025 빅토리아 시크릿 패션쇼 트와이스 풀공연. 16 0914 ㅇㅎ빅시 출연한 트와이스 근황. Watch short videos about jihyos victorias secret trend from people around the world.

ant 뜻 19 2012 목록 스크랩 1 댓글 496 개. 다들 21세기 2026년 맞냐고 충격받고 있는 뉴스 아프가니스탄 교육부. — 트와이스 twice 빅시 무대 장악, 나연 지효. 따라서 이러한 재데뷔형 서바이벌의 경우 프로그램 특성상 과거부터 당대 최고 티어에 올라간 아티스트는 참여하지 않았으며, 세계적인 그룹 방탄소년단, 블랙핑크는 물론이고 세븐틴, 스트레이 키즈, nct, 투바투, 트와이스, 에스파, 아이브, 여자아이들. 피드메이커 2기 패션 228개의 글 목록열기. av 아라카와 소라

alolan nightscape 무명의 더쿠 20251016 124926. 노트들만 보면 처음에 과일향 강하게 나고 다음에 꽃향들 나는거 같은데 좀 궁금해서. 381 2 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 트와이스 twice 빅토리아시크릿패션쇼 victoriasecret2025 kpop걸그룹 classofpink thisisfor strategy 글로벌패션쇼 트와이스10주년 헤드라이너 빅시무대. 약후 트와이스 쯔위가 빅토리아 시크릿 무대에서 착용한 속옷이 품절사태. arachnid 전체 영화 무료 다운로드

antonyms of dumbfounded 따라서 이러한 재데뷔형 서바이벌의 경우 프로그램 특성상 과거부터 당대 최고 티어에 올라간 아티스트는 참여하지 않았으며, 세계적인 그룹 방탄소년단, 블랙핑크는 물론이고 세븐틴, 스트레이 키즈, nct, 투바투, 트와이스, 에스파, 아이브, 여자아이들. Com › 175kpop 런웨이 점령. 이슈 2025 빅토리아 시크릿 패션쇼 트와이스 풀공연. 와 빅토리아시크릿에 트와이스멤버들 의상 화끈하네. 이슈 트와이스 모모가 알려주는 몸매 비결 14,458 63 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. av걸스

asmr korean youtuber jigsaw video 19 1852 그 브라탑 같은거 쯔위가 입은거 목록 스크랩 0 공유. 와 빅토리아시크릿에 트와이스멤버들 의상 화끈하네. 이슈 약후 트와이스 쯔위가 빅토리아 시크릿 무대에서 착용한 속옷이 품절사태. 저번에 빅시쇼 나간거 흥해가지고 정식으로 콜라보 한듯. 이날 무대에는 나연, 지효, 쯔위, 모모가 참여했습니다.

aliceholic 13 pikpak 이번 빅시쇼에 왜 4명만 나온건지 아는 덬들은 없지. 무명의 더쿠 20251016 124926. 트와이스 twice 빅토리아시크릿패션쇼 victoriasecret2025 kpop걸그룹 classofpink thisisfor strategy 글로벌패션쇼 트와이스10주년 헤드라이너 빅시무대. 2025 빅토리아 시크릿 패션쇼 트와이스 풀공연. 381 2 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.