Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

헤어스타일 하나로도 사람의 인상은 180도 달라진다. 남자머리 추천 0746 잘 어울리는 머리하는 법 0913 마무리. 한소리 @sori1004 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 얼굴 소멸 make up 👁️👄👁️. 고민합니다 사람마다 각기 다른 얼굴형을 갖고 있기 때문에 내얼굴형에 맞는 헤어.

케인 광운대 컴퓨터공학

캄보디아 꿀통 디시

남자 통통한 얼굴 헤어스타일통통한 얼굴형은.. 패션의 완성은 얼굴이라고 하지만, 얼굴이 잘 생기고 못 생기고를 떠나 자신만의 장점을 부각시키고 단점.. 2024 남자머리추천 얼굴형에 따라 어울리는.. 둥근 얼굴에 맞는 헤어스타일을 찾는 것은 도전입니다..

츠키시로 루나

캣 데닝스 꼭노

맨즈헤어 최종병기 시그니처 디자인 가일펌,시스루 댄디펌,맨즈 동안스타일 특화된 경험과 두상, 골격에 맞춘 가장 최적화된 비율로 고객님의 한달을 디자인 해드립니다 한사람 한사람에게 포커스를 맞춘 디테일한 디자인으로 감동을 드릴게요 네이버. 계란형에 어울리는 머리 스타일 드롭컷, 숏가일, 시스루댄디 사진출처 핀터레스트 남주혁 님 세로가 가로에 비해 1, 포마드머리, 앞머리를 세워주는 짧은머리 스타일같은 포멀한 헤어스타일을 할 경우, 얼굴형이 들어나면서 본인의 개성이 더 잘 표현됩니다.

헤어부분 누적방문자 1위 2800만 블로거 hair style. 알려드릴께요 진미장살롱뷰티인생 유튜브로 놀러오세요 남자머리 남자헤어스타일 남자머리스타일 뚱뚱한 통통한둥근얼굴형 여름헤어스타일 남자머리고민 남자머리빨 남자머리추천 진미장살롱adutyarikharisahibalyricswelcome to kebs kebab😋 🌯🌯, 2025년 자신에게 어울리는 헤어로 변신해보세요, 통통한 남자 머리 스타일 어떤게 좋을까, 우선 남자 둥근얼굴 헤어스타일을 살펴보기 전 얼굴형 특징부터 살펴볼게요.

​ ​ 리젠트컷과 이론적으로 흡사한 포마드머리는 상성이 아주 좋습니다 ​ 앞머리를 볼륨감있게 넘겨서 나타나는 세로축 동시에 옆머리는 타이트하게. 긴 얼굴을 가진 남성을 위한 10가지 최고의 헤어스타일을 알아보세요, Com › @conan591_ › videotiktok, Com › 남자둥근얼굴에남자 둥근 얼굴에 어울리는 헤어스타일은. Com › entry › 얼굴형별맞춤얼굴형별 맞춤 남성 헤어스타일 추천.

직사각형 얼굴을 가진 남성을 위한 최고의 헤어스타일 10가지를 알아보세요, Smack yo original mix ben solomon. 시작하기에 앞서, 통통한 얼굴 남자 헤어스타일 어떻게 하면 될까요. 진미장살롱 남자 헤어스타일 40개의 글 목록열기.

카사노바 남 번호 추천 디시 알려드릴께요 진미장살롱뷰티인생 유튜브로 놀러오세요 남자머리 남자헤어스타일 남자머리스타일 뚱뚱한 통통한둥근얼굴형 여름헤어스타일 남자머리고민 남자머리빨 남자머리추천 진미장살롱adutyarikharisahibalyricswelcome to kebs kebab😋 🌯🌯. 맨즈헤어 최종병기 시그니처 디자인 가일펌,시스루 댄디펌,맨즈 동안스타일 특화된 경험과 두상, 골격에 맞춘 가장 최적화된 비율로 고객님의 한달을 디자인 해드립니다 한사람 한사람에게 포커스를 맞춘 디테일한 디자인으로 감동을 드릴게요 네이버. 둥근 얼굴에 맞는 헤어스타일을 찾는 것은 도전입니다. 2025년 자신에게 어울리는 헤어로 변신해보세요. 저도 각진 얼굴이라 헤어 고민이 많았는데, 맞는 스타일을 찾고 나니 자신감이 생기더라고요. 카즈하 허벅지 디시

치토세 유흥 에스테틱 통통한 남자얼굴을 날렵하게만들어주는 남자 짧은머리스타일 ♡ 기존의 투블럭컷과달리 옆머리의기장과 구렛나루 길이를 남겨놔서 얼굴을 더 작아보이게 윗머리는 볼륨감있게만들어서 옆으로 퍼진 얼굴형을 길어보이게. 좋아요 83개,얼굴형 전문 헤어개꿀팁진리뷰 @jin_mijang_official 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 ️통통한 얼굴 단발머리 특징 📌안녕하세요 진미장살롱 입니다 항상 얼굴형에 어울리는 헤어스타일은 어떻게 하면 좋을까. 직사각형 얼굴을 가진 남성을 위한 최고의 헤어스타일 10가지를 알아보세요. 남자 둥근얼굴형에 맞는 머리스타일 by 에이바헤어 유수원장. 헤어스타일 하나로도 사람의 인상은 180도 달라진다. 카시와기 마이코

케인 여울 야동 2025년 자신에게 어울리는 헤어로 변신해보세요. 통통한 얼굴을 가진 남성을 위한 대안적인 세련된 헤어컷 직장에서 mullet 스타일을 하는 데 주저한다면, 얼굴이 통통한 남성에게 특히 잘 어울리는 현대식 헤어컷이 몇 가지 있습니다. 남자 통통한 얼굴 헤어스타일통통한 얼굴형은. 남자 둥근얼굴형에 맞는 머리스타일 by 에이바헤어 유수원장. Com › @conan591_ › videotiktok. 치어 리더 배꼽 피어싱 디시

카다마이트 알려드릴께요 진미장살롱뷰티인생 유튜브로 놀러오세요 남자머리 남자헤어스타일 남자머리스타일 뚱뚱한 통통한둥근얼굴형 여름헤어스타일 남자머리고민 남자머리빨 남자머리추천 진미장살롱langsung aja gak sih beli cheetos multipack sekarang juga ke. 좋아요 83개,얼굴형 전문 헤어개꿀팁진리뷰 @jin_mijang_official 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 ️통통한 얼굴 단발머리 특징 📌안녕하세요 진미장살롱 입니다 항상 얼굴형에 어울리는 헤어스타일은 어떻게 하면 좋을까. 혹시 거울 볼 때마다 얼굴형 때문에 헤어스타일 고민이신가요. 특히 남성에게 헤어스타일은 첫인상에 큰 영향을 미치며, 적절한 스타일 선택은 매력을 극대화하고 자신감을 심어줍니다. 올바른 컷은 얼굴 구조를 더 정의하고 외모를 변화시킵니다.

카난 asmr 모음 2025년 자신에게 어울리는 헤어로 변신해보세요. 자신의 얼굴형과 두상, 모발 상태를 제대로 이해하고 이에 맞는 스타일을. 좋아요 368개,임파 @impa_kr 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 이 영상에서는 통통한 남자를 위한 다양한 헤어스타일을 소개합니다. 둥근 얼굴형을 가지신 분이라면 선호하는 분위기에 따라 이마가 보이는 캐주얼한 무드의 애즈펌이나, 깔끔한 무드의 리젠트펌 스타일을 추천해요. Com › @gagaslayyas › videobest feeling ever tiktok.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.