충남대는 이 밖에 신입생을 대상으로 새내기 배움터, 전공 박람회, 학부생 연구 지원 프로그램, 전공 탐색전 등 다양한 프로그램도 운영한다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

같은거 별로 안좋아하나봐 유치하게 클리셰가득하게 꽁냥꽁냥하는거 좋아하네 1 12095 잡담 만생종 한돈희 질문 2 12094 잡담 ㅇㅂㅇ 덬두라 나 인생 첨으로 혼자 부동산매물 보러간다 ㄷㄱㄷㄱ 12093 잡담 인연 305 진짜 벨인생 제일 충격적인 사랑고백임 2 1212 33. 제대 후 갓 복학한 일후는 같은 교양을 듣는 후배를 통해 채헌을 알게 된다. 탐색전탐색전,bl&gl，학원bl，소개：제대 후 갓 복학한 일후는 같은 교양을 듣는 후배를 통해 채헌을 알게 된다. 잡담 탐색전 탐색전 요약이네 265 3 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

무명의 더쿠 20260130 170748 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다.

Com › Books › 2404004336탐색전 개정판 Bl 웹툰 리디.

입학 전 학생들에게 학과 선호도를 조사한 뒤 관심이 있는 학과로 이른바 탐색 분반을 배정한다.

잡담 탐색전 웹툰만 봤는데 77 2 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. Day ago 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다. 잡담 탐색전 공 되게 능구렁이같네 56 1, 잡담 탐색전 외전을 여전히 기다리는편 21 1. 잡담 탐색전 공 되게 능구렁이같네 56 1, 맠다때 산 거 이번에 깠는데 연하여우공 미쳤다p.

무명의 더쿠 20260130 191624, 벨 입덕한지 사실 얼마 안됐어 불호 없는 새럼이야 강력 영업 부탁해 ˃̶͈ᴗ˂̶͈. 탐색전 언제 재미없어짐 칼과꽃 솔직히 권희량 얘들아 비비드러브샷 한번만 봐주라 100원대연데 ㅇㅂㅇ ㄹㄷ 무충겜 아이들 어쩌구 이거 다들 어떻게 하루만에 하는거지. Net › blnovelwebtoon › 4076478826더쿠 굿즈 왔는데 미쵸따.

잡담 탐색전 뭔데 왜이렇게 설레 207 1. 보수 야권의 주요 청년 정치인들이 김영삼 전 대통령의 정치 행보를 재조명하는 다큐멘터리 영화 시사회에 총결집하는 것으로 알려졌다, 제대 후 갓 복학한 일후는 같은 교양을 듣는 후배를 통해 채헌을 알게 된다. Net › blnovelwebtoon › 4078690254더쿠 2월달 원픽 작을수밖에.

전 트랙 가이드는 힘들 것 같아트랙팟 보자 벨방마크 박았으니까 더쿠 내에서만 봐줘.

더쿠 이용 규칙 스퀘어 정치글은 정치 카테고리에 bl소설웹툰에서 진행한 이벤트 한눈에 보기 2024.. 무명의 더쿠 원덬 20260130 191405 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다.. 무명의 더쿠 원덬 20260130 164944 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다.. 맠다때 산 거 이번에 깠는데 연하여우공 미쳤다p..

그런 채헌은 때로는 일후에게 달콤한 말과 예쁜 미소로 다가오기도,시비를 걸듯 수상하게 다가오기도 한다. 이쯤에서 보는 탐색전 공의 말말말 대잔치 발췌있음, 긴글. 맠다때 산 거 이번에 깠는데 연하여우공 미쳤다p. 잡담 헐 탐색전 맠다 리스트에 있구나 15 0.

google 정원요정 공지가 길다면 한번씩 눌러서 읽어주시면 됩니다. To › title › 196162탐색전 read free manga online at bato. 오로지 드씨랑 소설만 취향이어서 웹툰은 모으지 않았지만 ༼. 잡담 봄툰에서 탐색전 웹툰 2코인전한닷 32 0. Net › blnovelwebtoon › 4077416325더쿠 수편애인데도 이런건 좀 힘들다. halcali おつかれ summer 노래방 번호

gelbooru panties Net › blnovelwebtoon › 4071782870더쿠 탐색전 언제 잼없어짐. 무명의 더쿠 20260130 191422 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다. 잡담 탐색전 래터프롬썸머 크리스마스러브바이트 93 2 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. Com › book › 11852탐색전웹툰. 일후는 이런 채헌이 기분이 나쁘면서도 계속 신경이 쓰인다. guilty hall hitomi

fc2ppv4801376 주인공들 관계성 긴장감 있는 툰 이거말고 더 있을까. Net › blnovelwebtoon › 4071782870더쿠 탐색전 언제 잼없어짐. Com › book › 11852탐색전웹툰. Com › books › 2404004336탐색전 개정판 bl 웹툰 리디. 입학 전 학생들에게 학과 선호도를 조사한 뒤 관심이 있는 학과로 이른바 탐색 분반을 배정한다. fighter pikpak

gangbang pikpak 오로지 드씨랑 소설만 취향이어서 웹툰은 모으지 않았지만 ༼. 한번씩 생각나는 의문의 캠퍼스물이었는데. 탐색전 언제 재미없어짐 칼과꽃 솔직히 권희량 얘들아 비비드러브샷 한번만 봐주라 100원대연데 ㅇㅂㅇ ㄹㄷ 무충겜 아이들 어쩌구 이거 다들 어떻게 하루만에 하는거지. Com › comic › detail탐색전 개정판 bl 네이버 시리즈. 잡담 탐색전 공수이름 특이한데 예쁘고 118 1.

giantess xnr 충남대는 이 밖에 신입생을 대상으로 새내기 배움터, 전공 박람회, 학부생 연구 지원 프로그램, 전공 탐색전 등 다양한 프로그램도 운영한다. 그런 채헌은 때로는 일후에게 달콤한 말과 예쁜 미소로 다가오기도,시비를 걸듯 수상하게 다가오기도 한다. 제대 후 갓 복학한 일후는 같은 교양을 듣는 후배를 통해 채헌을 알게 된다. 그 누구보다 다르면서도그 누구보다 닮은 두 사람만의,서로를 향한 『탐색전』. Days ago 공한테 업보가 있는 것도 아니고, 그렇다고 성격이 개아가도 아니고, 다정한 벤츠공인데, 수 주변사람도 아니고 공 주변사람들이 전부 공만 잡도리하고 공 잘못한거 없음 수한테 진짜 잘해줌 수는 우쭈쭈하고 있음 ㅠㅠ 심지어 공 주변인들이 다 헤테로인데도 수한테 쟤 공가 너한테 조금이라도.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.