Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › sss_b_b › 223576673434이사노무구치 아카리 천장등 은은한 매력 네이버 블로그. 저는 40cm 60cm 둘다 구입했는데요 이사무노구치 아카리 한지등 전등갓의 크기를 비교해서 보여드릴께요. 친한선배 berryz코보 츠구나가 모모코. 애니판 2기에 나미리와 썸, 데이트 관련 에피소드들이 있었으나, 나미리가 데이트 사실이 소문이 나기 싫어서 짱구에게 거짓으로 싫다고 말한 것을 우연히 듣고 진심으로 오해한 바람에 깨지고 말았다.

카쿠호

칸로지 미츠리 섹스

나미리 와 데이트를 한 적도 있지만 깨졌다. 침대 뉴 프레임이 들어오고 나니 기존에 이 우드 벽조명이 너무 안어울리는 것. Com › ssfwteam › 222780254006isamu noguchi 이사무 노구치 akari 아카리 램프 네이버 블로그.

애니판 2기에 나미리와 썸, 데이트 관련 에피소드들이 있었으나, 나미리가 데이트 사실이 소문이 나기 싫어서 짱구에게 거짓으로 싫다고 말한 것을 우연히 듣고 진심으로 오해한 바람에 깨지고 말았다, 이 에피소드의 방영 15년이 넘은 2011년 방영분, 이 에피소드의 방영 15년이 넘은 2011년 방영분. 이사무노구치 아카리 hay 라이스 페이퍼 쉐이드 이케아 레골리트 순으로 정리된다. 은퇴 이후 한동안 잠적하다가 이름을 유카로 바꾸고 트위터 @yuuuuuu_54 으로 활동하였다.

전 다카라즈카 가극단 유키구미 소속 남역이다, Com › love___6255 › 223152680336이사무노구치 아카리 조명 가격, 구입 방법, 직구, 구매대행, 도쿄 아. 1635 이웃추가 남자의집, 김지껄 mans house 글, 사진┃김지껄 이사노무구치 아카리 천장등 은은한 매력 조명은 공간의 분위기를 좌우하는 중요한 요소입니다 그 중에서도 이사노무구치 아카리 천장등, 와 이거 소문으로만 들었는데 실제로 직관하니까 미적 감각이 장난이 아니었습니다. 이렇게 220v 돼지코 연결하면 사용할 수 있는데요.

칸나 남친

프롤로그 블로그 인테리어 인테리어가구 128개의 글 목록열기.. 프롤로그 블로그 인테리어 태그 인테리어가구 128개의 글 목록열기..

이사노무구치 브랜드 조명의 은은한 매력, 일본 공예의 현대적 재해석 이사노무구치 아카리 천장등은 은은함의 정점입니다 일본 전통 공예를 현대적으로 재해석한 디자이너의 작품 실제 대나무를 사용한 프레임이 자연스러운 질감을 표현. 만 19세인 2020년 1월에 s1 전속 배우로 데뷔하며 7편의 작품을 촬영하고 은퇴하였다. Com › semi7013 › 223697001177인테리어 조명 이사무노구치 아카리 한지등 전등갓 크기 비교 네이. 일본 의 홋카이도 출신으로 친 어머니는 전설의 코스모 뷰티인 미도 토모에. 이사무노구치 아카리 hay 라이스 페이퍼 쉐이드 이케아 레골리트 순으로 정리된다.

타케우치 아카리 타케우치 아카리 일본어 竹内朱莉 다케우치 아카리, 1997년 11월 23일 는 일본의 여성 아이돌 그룹 전 안주루무 의 리더. 친한선배 berryz코보 츠구나가 모모코. Com에서 아카리조명 최저가 상품부터 아카리조명 추천인기 상품까지, 할인 가격으로 만나보세요.

카리나 nude 어떤 다양한 배역을 맡았는지 같이 살펴보면 재밌을 것 같아서 기획해 봤습니다. 이사무 노구치의 아카리 램프 오늘은 이사무 노구치가 디자인한 아카리 램프를 소개합니다. 일본 의 홋카이도 출신으로 친 어머니는 전설의 코스모 뷰티인 미도 토모에. Com › sss_b_b › 223576673434이사노무구치 아카리 천장등 은은한 매력 네이버 블로그. 이렇게 220v 돼지코 연결하면 사용할 수 있는데요. 치즈카츠 무잔

카사노바 이사무노구치 아카리 30, 45, 55 hay 라이스페이퍼쉐이드 50, 60 이케아 레골리트 45 사이즈로 나뉘는것으로 보인다. 츠쿠모 유마의 누나로, 나이는 20세. 텐쿠지 타케루 천유영 가면라이더 고스트 츠키무라 아카리 문슬기 가면라이더 고스트 야마노우치 오나리 현진 가면라이더 네크롬 1 가면라이더 고스트 하치오지 시부야 윤유하 가면라이더 고스트 키사라즈 나리타 이탁 가면라이더 고스트. 세금, 생활비 등등을 다 감당하고 있다. 이 에피소드의 방영 15년이 넘은 2011년 방영분. 카 나오 착정

케 모노 파티 디시 나미리 와 데이트를 한 적도 있지만 깨졌다. 침대 뉴 프레임이 들어오고 나니 기존에 이 우드 벽조명이 너무 안어울리는 것. Com › semi7013 › 223697001177인테리어 조명 이사무노구치 아카리 한지등 전등갓 크기 비교 네이. 1240 이웃추가 남자의집, 김지껄 mans house 글, 사진┃김지껄 공간의 완성 이사노무구치 아카리 천장조명 공간 인테리어에서 조명이 차지하는 비중은 생각보다 큽니다 그 중에서도 이사노무구치 아카리 천장조명은 다양한 표현이 가능할 정도로 예술적인 가치가 있었어요 공간디자인을. 이사무노구치 아카리 30, 45, 55 hay 라이스페이퍼쉐이드 50, 60 이케아 레골리트 45 사이즈로 나뉘는것으로 보인다. 캣츠아이 남자친구

카오아와세 뜻 School idol project series는 각각 일본 서브컬쳐계 매출 1위와 3위다. 2020년 1월에 s1에스원 전속배우로 데뷔하여 활동하고 있는 아카리 쿄코 입니다. 저희집을 소개하자면 20평대 아파트 로 거실크기는 보통이고 층고가 230cm 정도로 낮은편이에요. 1635 이웃추가 남자의집, 김지껄 mans house 글, 사진┃김지껄 이사노무구치 아카리 천장등 은은한 매력 조명은 공간의 분위기를 좌우하는 중요한 요소입니다 그 중에서도 이사노무구치 아카리 천장등, 와 이거 소문으로만 들었는데 실제로 직관하니까 미적 감각이 장난이 아니었습니다. 침대 뉴 프레임이 들어오고 나니 기존에 이 우드 벽조명이 너무 안어울리는 것.

카와기타 사이카 할머니와 유마와 셋이서 살면서 돌봐주고 있다. Com › quarterq › 223670442091다재다능한 성우 키토 아카리 출연작 애니 캐릭터 best 5. 츠쿠모 유마의 누나로, 나이는 20세. 재단 시절의 예명은 카나미 세나 叶海世奈이다. 침대 뉴 프레임이 들어오고 나니 기존에 이 우드 벽조명이 너무 안어울리는 것.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.