Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

클라라, 대만서 19금 파격 누드 동영상찍은 이유는. 클라라, 대만 노출 화보감출 수 없는 섹시미. 성적 수치심 발언으로 논란을 빚고 있는 클라라와 소속사 회장의 문자 메시지가 공개되면서 파문을 일으키고 있습니다. 클라라가 남다른 수영복 자태를 드러냈습니다.

젠이츠 네즈코 사진

젠존제 음성

이어 클라라는 카메라를 응시하며 인터뷰를 진행하는가 하면. 공개된 영상 속에는 클라라가 나체로 침대에 엎드려 하의만을 가린 포즈를 취하고 있다. 다만 해당 의혹에 별다른 반응을 나타내지 않았다, 앞서 클라라는 지난해 6월 폴라리스와 오는 2018년까지 계약을 맺었지만 회장 이씨가 저녁 술자리를 제안하는 등의 문자 메시지를 보내기 시작하며 성적.

제품 암웨이

면서 현재 유출 경로를 확인 중인데 아직 파악하지 못한 상황이라고 설명했다. 앞서 폴라리스는 클라라 측이 앞뒤 내용을 모두 자르고, 이상한 사람처럼 회장의 명예를 훼손했다라며 문자메시지 전문공개를 요구하며 반박했다. 지나친 몸매 노출로 논란을 일으켰던 클라라가 이번엔 가슴 노출 영상으로 구설에 올랐다.

앞서 클라라는 지난해 6월 폴라리스와 오는 2018년까지 계약을 맺었지만 회장 이씨가 저녁 술자리를 제안하는 등의 문자 메시지를 보내기 시작하며 성적.. 클라라 졸업사진, 노출 없이도 차분하고 성숙한 모습 눈길.. 앞서 클라라는 지난해 6월 폴라리스와 오는 2018년까지 계약을 맺었지만 회장 이씨가 저녁 술자리를 제안하는 등의 문자 메시지를 보내기 시작하며 성적.. 배우 클라라가 폴라리스 엔터테인먼트이하 폴라리스의 이 회장과 나눈 문자 메시지가 전문 공개됐다..

정욕여신

Com › watchystar clara opens private messages to the public 문자 공개. Kr › article › 16971173클라라 문자의 상대, 이 회장은 누구, 지난 25일 방송된 mbc에브리원 싱글즈 시즌2에서는 배우 클라. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 스타뉴스 김미화 기자 사진클라라 개인 계정배우 클라라가 갑작스러운 성형 의혹에 휩싸였다. 워킹걸 클라라, 예고편에서 가슴 노출+파격 19금 멘트. 이에 대해 클라라 측 관계자는 한 매체를 통해 폴라리스 측의 일방적인 공개 부분이며, 현재 홍콩에 체류 중이라 미처 확인하지 못했다.

전여빈 디시 클라라는 지난 12일 자신의 인스타그램에 홍콩의 한 호텔에서 찍은 사진을 여러 장 올렸다. Kr › entertain › celebritytopic클라라, 홍콩 호텔서 아찔 원피스&mldr. 앞서 클라라는 지난해 6월 폴라리스와 오는 2018년까지 계약을 맺었지만 회장 이씨가 저녁 술자리를 제안하는 등의 문자 메시지를 보내기 시작하며 성적. 이규태 회장은 클라라 부녀가 작년 9월22일 카카오톡 메시지 등을 근거로 성적 수치심을 느껴 계약을 유지할 수 없다. 클라라, 대만 노출 화보감출 수 없는 섹시미. 제갈은교

제미나이 얼평 디시 22일 클라라는 자신의 인스타그램 계정에 한류연예대상, 한류스타대상 주셔서 감사합니다. 클라라 노출,사진모음 클라라 요가 네이버 블로그. 모델 겸 배우 클라라가 최근 성형 의혹이 불거지자 해명에 나섰다. 22일 클라라는 자신의 인스타그램 계정에 한류연예대상, 한류스타대상 주셔서 감사합니다. 이에 클라라는 논란이 된 사진을 직접 게재하며 당당하게 심경을 전했다. 정서현 신음

정액 먹는 여자 Png 「이 세상에는 인간이 지어야 할 낙원이 있습니다. 클라라가 일상 속에서 유저들에게 메시지를 보내는 내용으로 구성된 이. 혹시 운리광추 클라라주고 써본사람있음. 이어 클라라는 카메라를 응시하며 인터뷰를 진행하는가 하면. 클라라가 남다른 수영복 자태를 드러냈습니다. 조건녀 조유라 워터마크없는 원본영상

조승연 이혼 배우 클라라와 전 소속사인 폴라리스 엔터테인먼트 이 모 회장이 주고받은 문자 내용이 공개되면서 전속계약 무효 소송을 둘러싼 양 측의 진실. 02 2057 0 사진방송 캡처 방송인 클라라가 의상 논란으로 화제가 되고있다. 앞으로도 한류에 좋은 영향력이 되는 배우 클라라가 되겠다고 덧붙였다. Com › article › 2013081533287클라라, 샤워 후 수건만 두르고&mldr. 동아닷컴 방송인 클라라가 아찔한 반라 뒤태를 노출했다.

제니 노출 디시 이성민클라라 2 야동 xhamster. 최근 클라라는 온라인 pc게임 바람의 나라에서 공개한 홍보 영상을 통해 다양한 매력을 뽐냈다. 클라라는 지난 달 30일 자신의 트위터에 파격적인 노출을 한 사진을 게재했다. 19 1353 조회 6,628 기사 인쇄하기 글자 사이즈 줄이기 글자 사이즈 키우기. 이규태 회장은 클라라 부녀가 작년 9월22일 카카오톡 메시지 등을 근거로 성적 수치심을 느껴 계약을 유지할 수 없다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.