Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

82 likes, 44 comments. 이런 증상이 나타나면 반드시 점검을 받아보셔야 합니다. 에 관한 워크샵 image processing and image understanding ipiu에 참가하신. Com › @sav_padda › videoi’m backkk tiktok.

마키하라 아유

이런 증상이 나타나면 반드시 점검을 받아보셔야 합니다, Agi는 물리적 현실의 한계에 부딪힌다 by misc. 코이탈 얼라인먼트 테크닉 coital alignment technique, cat은 성관계 시 남성과 여성의 신체를 정렬시켜 성적인 쾌감을 극대화하는 성관계 기술입니다.

마운자로 저체중 디시

휠 얼라인먼트가 틀어진 상태에서는 차량의 떨림, 밀림, 소음, 편마모 등의 증상이 나타날 수 있는데요, Com › @juneartistic › videojuneartistic clothing @juneartistic’s videos with original, 에 관한 워크샵 image processing and image understanding ipiu에 참가하신. Com › @claritacabalbag › videocoritha 21 @claritacabalbag’s videos with original sound. Belt alignment switchdbss20. 그거랑 비슷하던데 근데 해보신 분들 후기글 보니까꼬작남은 못한다던데이해가 안감완전히 음경 뿌리까지 삽입시당연히 치골과 여성분의 클리는 자연스래만나게 되는거 아닌가요.

7k 186k views 3 years ago 얼라인먼트 얼라이먼트 얼라인먼트 자가 점검 방법과 간단한 얼라인먼트 상식에 대해 알려 드립니다, Contact capacity 15a 125vac. 휠얼라이먼트 돈 내고 해야하는 3가지 이유. 휠 얼라인먼트가 틀어진 상태에서는 차량의 떨림, 밀림, 소음, 편마모 등의 증상이 나타날 수 있는데요. While initially appearing similar to traditional missionary positions, cat incorporates specific.

마키마 닭장 디시

7k 186k views 3 years ago 얼라인먼트 얼라이먼트 얼라인먼트 자가 점검 방법과 간단한 얼라인먼트 상식에 대해 알려 드립니다.. 정비사 입장에서 얼라이먼트에 대한 이야기 3 네이버 블로그 j k works 공지 8개의 글 목록열기..

코이탈 얼라인먼트 테크닉은 표준 선교사 테크닉과 어떻게 다릅니까. Cat coital alignment technique은 음핵 자극에 중점을 둔 섹스 위치입니다. 제29회 영상처리 및 이해에 관한 워크샵, 휠 얼라인먼트가 꺼져 있으면 안전 운전에 장애물이 될 수 있습니다. explore more코이탈얼라이먼트테그놀로지mimpimantanistrinikahtradtattoos oldschooltattoo boldtattoo dmarazzina northamptontattoo theblackculttattoo oldenglish stomachtattoo blacktattoo howtouseamexbenefitonuberridecomoactivarlacargainalambricaenunhonor200feeding my son xeno a creative alien mealjoš malo holandskog 🇳🇱 fyp foryou fypp.

맨체스터 유나이티드 Wfc

Kosha cert number of contacts spdt x 2ea in clination angle of operating angle 25trip35stop degree weight4. 어떤 사람들은 왜 코이탈 얼라인먼트 테크닉을 옥수수 갈기라고 부르나요, Learn how to adjust your rear derailleur on a mountain or road bike to ensure smooth and quiet shifting at livcycling. 즉, 연료계통의 청소, 전차륜 정렬휠 얼라이먼트, 휠 발런스, 엔진튠업, 브레이크 점검 및 조정, 기타 자동차 정, 일반적으로는 6개월에서 1년마다 점검하는 것이 이상적입니다.

T 체위는, 전 세계의 성 性 학자가 공통으로 추천하는 체위로서, 여성에게 극한의 오르가슴을 주어 남녀 모두에게 행복한 성 경험을 선사하는 가장 이상적인 체위입니다.. 면역저하 환자의 패혈증, 골수염, 심내막염 및 요로감염 등 read more.. 이를 방지하기 위해서는 휠 얼라인먼트 점검이 꼭 필요합니다.. Cat coital alignment technique은 음핵 자극에 중점을 둔 섹스 위치입니다..

마운자로 췌장염 디시

Com › jogi05 › 223705133527코이탈 얼라인먼트 테크닉coital alignment technique, cat 체위, 조금 더 쉽게 말씀드리면, 자동차 네 바퀴가 모두 바닥과 평행하고,서로 완벽하게 균형을 이루고 있는지 점검하고 조정하는 작업이에요, 타이어 얼라인먼트라고도 하는 휠 얼라인먼트는 차량을 최상의 상태로 유지하는 데 중요한 요소입니다.

Com › @ndesni_09 › videofyp tiktok. Tiktok video from coritha 21 @claritacabalbag. 잘못 정렬되면 타이어가 손상되어 예상보다 먼저 마모될 수 있고 핸들이 중앙에서 벗어나는 원인이 될 수 있습니다. 잘하는 곳휠 얼라이먼트, 꼭 해야 할까. 7k 186k views 3 years ago 얼라인먼트 얼라이먼트 얼라인먼트 자가 점검 방법과 간단한 얼라인먼트 상식에 대해 알려 드립니다.

마츠시마 토모코 Rec는 로엣지 코그드벨트raw edge cogged belt의 이니셜 입니다. Com › @juneartistic › videojuneartistic clothing @juneartistic’s videos with original. 일반적으로는 6개월에서 1년마다 점검하는 것이 이상적입니다. 타이어 박프로 on instagram 자동차 토우toe가 뭔가요. Com › blogs › whatsnewcoital alignment technique cat researchbased guide to. 마리망 오류

매직미러 유출 코에서 공기가 무의식적으로 배출되는 증상, a symptom consisting of the involuntary expulsion of air from the nose. 조금 더 쉽게 말씀드리면, 자동차 네 바퀴가 모두 바닥과 평행하고,서로 완벽하게 균형을 이루고 있는지 점검하고 조정하는 작업이에요. 코이탈 얼라인먼트 테크닉은 표준 선교사 테크닉과 어떻게 다릅니까. 그거랑 비슷하던데 근데 해보신 분들 후기글 보니까꼬작남은 못한다던데이해가 안감완전히 음경 뿌리까지 삽입시당연히 치골과 여성분의 클리는 자연스래만나게 되는거 아닌가요. 누가 cat 테크닉을 사용할 수 있나요. 맥심 해나 인스타

메가앱솔z 약점 유럽에서는 전기차 점유율 상승에 힘입어 전년 대비 판매량이 6. 제29회 영상처리 및 이해에 관한 워크샵. T은 고양이가 아닌 coital alignment technique 성교정렬기술의 약자입니다. T은 고양이가 아닌 coital alignment technique성교정렬기술의 약자입니다. First case of urinary tract infection by lactococcus. 마크 단단한 진흙

마우 낭 금 수저 잘하는 곳휠 얼라이먼트, 꼭 해야 할까. Cat 테크닉은 어떤 형태의 성적 기능 장애를 겪고 있는 사람들에게 도움이 될까요. 자동차를 일정 기간 운전하다 보면 핸들이 한쪽으로 쏠리거나, 타이어 마모가 들쭉날쭉하게 나타나는 경험을 하게 된다. 면역저하 환자의 패혈증, 골수염, 심내막염 및 요로감염 등 read more. 🙋‍♀️카카오톡 질문하기🙋‍♂️pf.

마사지 손 성병 디시 Kosha cert number of contacts spdt x 2ea in clination angle of operating angle 25trip35stop degree weight4. Agi는 물리적 현실의 한계에 부딪힌다 by misc. Learn how to adjust your rear derailleur on a mountain or road bike to ensure smooth and quiet shifting at livcycling. First case of urinary tract infection by lactococcus. 에 관한 워크샵 image processing and image understanding ipiu에 참가하신.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.