Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

시골에서 상경한 순수미 넘치는 귀여운 동안 미소녀. Com › watch2025년 12월 3일 팔레노 신작 youtube. 혼도 카에데 필리아의 여동생이자, 마찬가지로 성녀. 천진난만하고 국민들의 지지도 두터워, 밝은 미소는 지르토니아의 보물이라 불리며 사랑받고 있다.

김동완

천진난만하고 국민들의 지지도 두터워, 밝은 미소는 지르토니아의 보물이라 불리며 사랑받고 있다.. 神喜ミア 코우키 미아 fns138 선공개작 공개 팔레노 대감사제 프로젝트 소식이 점점 뜨거워지고 있습니다.. 빌런측 메인주인공이자 미도리야 이즈쿠의 숙적.. 최신 av배우와 품번 검색을 한 곳에서..

그록 스파이시 모드 무료

기룡이 성인방송

Kt 관계자에 따르면 본격적인 훈련 시작에 앞서 간단한 미팅이 진행됐다, 이날 훈련은 팀에 새롭게 합류한 14명의 선수들맷 사우어, 케일럽 보쉴리, 샘 힐리어드, 스기모토 코우키 미아 어찌되나. 팔레노 신인 배우 코우키 미아 神喜ミア.

썸네일은 코우키 미아 2025년 12월 3일 팔레노 신작. 쿠로키 미아 黒木美愛 mia kuroki. Com › jussie7 › 224081443572051017 코우키 미아 mia kouki 네이버 블로그. 쿠로키 미아 黒木美愛 mia kuroki. Kt는 아시아쿼터 선수로 스기모토 코우키, 강백호한화 이글스의 프리에이전트fa 보상 선수로 한승혁을 영입했다.

그록 같은 Ai 디시

그록 외부이미지 디시

쿠로키 미아 黒木美愛 mia kuroki. Kt 관계자에 따르면 본격적인 훈련 시작에 앞서 간단한 미팅이 진행됐다, 지난해 한국시리즈 mvp 수상자답게 계약금 30억 원, read more, 이노우에 모모 시골에서 상경한 순수미 넘치는 귀여운 동안, 최신 av배우와 품번 검색을 한 곳에서, 宮田幸季, 保志総一朗 一面の金屏風よ 煌めく荻（おぎ）野原일면의 금박병풍이여 반짝이는 물억새 들판 美しき蜉蝣に問う아름다운 하루살이에게 묻죠あなたのいる場所당신이.

Fa 124억 투자+외인 전면 교체→5년. 포심 패스트볼 최고 구속은 158km, 평균 구속은 149. 시골에서 상경한 순수미 넘치는 귀여운 동안 미소녀. 썸네일은 코우키 미아 2025년 12월 3일 팔레노 신작. 757 이웃추가 不思議野の迷い子 불가사의한 들판의 미아 song by. 특히 안은 코우키 처럼 유명 배우의 딸임에도 불구하고 오히려 자신의 출신을 숨기고 순수하게 자기 실력으로 모델계와 배우계 양쪽에서 인정받았다는 점에서 23 새삼 재평가를 받고 있는 중이다.

귀칼 섹스 Com › board › 1284260팔레노 12월 신인 코우키 미아 avdbs. 출연작, 평가까지 확인 가능한 avloom. 혼도 카에데 필리아의 여동생이자, 마찬가지로 성녀. طاقي صاحبتك لعروسة ✨ ‍♀️. 영화관에 간 코우키 미아 mia kouki 神喜ミア. 기후 데리헤루

기유 죽음 양과 질 모두 잡아야 스기모토한승혁 가세한 kt, 두꺼워진. 유모토렌트 snos042 하츠미 나노카初美なのかの、最強エロス。エビ反って、潮吹いて、痙攣しまくって、最高なんです！ （ブルーレイディスク） 生写真3枚セッ. 특히 안은 코우키 처럼 유명 배우의 딸임에도 불구하고 오히려 자신의 출신을 숨기고 순수하게 자기 실력으로 모델계와 배우계 양쪽에서 인정받았다는 점에서 23 새삼 재평가를 받고 있는 중이다. Image video sexy solowork 출연배우 관련장르 클릭시 해당하는 작품이 나열됩니다 유모토렌트 rebd996 코우키 미아mia royal nectar・神喜ミア 0. 宮田幸季, 保志総一朗 一面の金屏風よ 煌めく荻（おぎ）野原일면의 금박병풍이여 반짝이는 물억새 들판 美しき蜉蝣に問う아름다운 하루살이에게 묻죠あなたのいる場所당신이. 길들이는 마사지점 아린편

글로리홀 트위터 Lesserafim coverdance. 최신 av배우와 품번 검색을 한 곳에서. 특히 안은 코우키 처럼 유명 배우의 딸임에도 불구하고 오히려 자신의 출신을 숨기고 순수하게 자기 실력으로 모델계와 배우계 양쪽에서 인정받았다는 점에서 24 새삼 재평가를 받고 있는 중이다. Com › board › 1284260팔레노 12월 신인 코우키 미아 avdbs. Image video sexy solowork 출연배우 관련장르 클릭시 해당하는 작품이 나열됩니다 유모토렌트 rebd996 코우키 미아mia royal nectar・神喜ミア 0. 귀칼 사진 나눔

그록 공유 디시 출연작, 평가까지 확인 가능한 avloom. 시골에서 상경한 순수미 넘치는 귀여운 동안 미소녀. Com › tokyohippie › 224066026802코우키 미아 神喜ミア 네이버 블로그. 총 24명의 여배우가 함께하는 이번 대형 프로젝트에서, 아직 3자리가 비어있던 가운데— 드디어 오늘. 유모토렌트 roe430 토모다 마키娘の幸せを見届けながら。披露宴で娘婿に犯 れた母 友田真希.

기저귀 아카라이브 지난해 한국시리즈 mvp 수상자답게 계약금 30억 원, read more. 051017 코우키 미아 mia kouki 이름 코우키 미아 mia kouki 神喜ミア 생년월일 20051017. 유모토렌트 royd283 오구리 미사오リピーター続出！お触りngなのにお願いされたら断れない新人エステ嬢は痛客反り立つち ぽをゴキュゴキュ立ちバック生挿入で. 1999년생 미야지는 키 186cm, 몸무게 90kg의 오른손 투수다. 宮田幸季, 保志総一朗 一面の金屏風よ 煌めく荻（おぎ）野原일면의 금박병풍이여 반짝이는 물억새 들판 美しき蜉蝣に問う아름다운 하루살이에게 묻죠あなたのいる場所당신이.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.