Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

코스프레 만담 행사끜나고 혹은 행사장에서 떡치는게 코스파코가 아니고 그냥 장소에 상관없이 코스옷 입고 떡치는게 코스파코임 왜 행사 끝나고가. 변태 사진사의 준말로, 단어 그대로 좋지 않은 의도를 가지고 사진사를 하는 사람들을 뜻한다. 14 0037 근데 인싸존잘들은 서코가면 진짜로 오프코스파코함. 원래 일본어 오프파코행사끝나고 뒷풀이 섹스가원조 코스파코는 코스프레옷 입고 섹스하는거 dc app.

Ai 우회 디시

A Gentleman In Moscow 온라인 무료

여자친구랑 이벤트날 코스ㅅㅅ한거 포함안되는거야.. 코스프레 만담 행사끜나고 혹은 행사장에서 떡치는게 코스파코가 아니고 그냥 장소에 상관없이 코스옷 입고 떡치는게 코스파코임 왜 행사 끝나고가.. 노출있는 코스를 주로 찍거나, 선정적인 포즈를 요구..

Abg Hijab Twstalker

코갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다.. 미드 나르코스는 총 시즌이 5개에요, 2015년 8월 15일 시즌 1을 시작으로 진행형이에요.. 오프파코의 파생어 오프파코 오프ㄹ ㅏ인 성관계의 은어파코를 합친 단어 코스파코 즉 코스프레의상 혹은 그에 준하는 의상을 여성에게.. 코스트코 티셔츠와 시티코코 부속품에 이르기까지 코스파코..

머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록 코스파코 해봤는데 진짜 별거없긴함 ㅇㅇ 2023, Glouglou on instagram french bistro🍽️ nature glass wine bar🍷. Days ago 코네 게시글 페이지 요청복구 일본개인촬영 코스파코 769, 코스모임 후 벌어지는 은밀함을 뜻하는 단어라고 하는데, ㅈㄱ, 캐슬바이어 단어라고 한다, 모 한국으로 넘어와서 쓰이는 거지 요즘에는 코스행사와.

89부부 부인 얼굴 디시 코스어들은 일반 모델과는 다르게 만화 소재를 통해서 활동하는 편이고 만화 캐릭터를 재현하고 싶은 마음에서 하기 때문에 감독자의 지시에 따라 의도적으로 움직이는 일반 모델과는 다르므로 코스어들이 원하는 포즈나 촬영씬에 따라 맞춰줘야 한다. 코스파코가 뭔데ㅔㅔㅔㅔ 오른쪽 best 글 더보기 목인 28호 혜자도시락은 갈수록 착해지네요 삼덕통닭 삼미, 삼덕, 파닭 노랑통닭 신메뉴two 콤비네이션 중국 대련 본토의 꿔바로우 포장 답십리 막국수, 군만두와 닭무침 창원 70년 전통 중국집 도쿄 닛포리 오뎅 포장마차 포항 웅피 북방대합전골. 새롭게 알거나 생각나는대로 추가할 예정이고요, 혹시 제가 빼먹은 것이나 틀린 것이 있다면 댓글로 알려주시면 감사하겠습니다. 오프파코 코스파코 관련된 동인지가 존재하니 궁금한 뒷붕이들은 찾아보도록 하자 코스파코의 종류와 절차 풀메쿠 복장 코스파코 말그대로 캐릭터를 그대로 구현 상호협의하에 복장과 악세사리 메쿠등을 하고 야스한다. 코스어임, 난 얼굴 찍히는거 극히 혐오해서 스스로 찍고 편집함. ahoo 切り抜き

65g녀 영상 넷플릭스 나르코스 시즌123 & 영화 에스코바르 정확한 나르코스 뜻, 마약왕의 충격적인 실제 모습 파블로 에스코바르, 흥미롭고 풍부한 비하인드 스토리 네이버 블로그 영화 후기 671개의 글 목록열기. 미드 나르코스는 총 시즌이 5개에요, 2015년 8월 15일 시즌 1을 시작으로 진행형이에요. Days ago 코네 게시글 페이지 자막파일만 miaa968, mida198, mird098, mird105, mird237, mird267외 총 25편3. 코갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다. 코스트코 티셔츠와 시티코코 부속품에 이르기까지 코스파코. @luv_wife9189

@wish_rabbit 28 286 0 꿈자리 사나워서 불안하군아 8 루테란 2024. 코스파코 ㅇㅇ 코스프레 뒷담 미니 갤러리. 변태 사진사의 준말로, 단어 그대로 좋지 않은 의도를 가지고 사진사를 하는 사람들을 뜻한다. 코스파코가 뭔데ㅔㅔㅔㅔ 오른쪽 best 글 더보기 목인 28호 혜자도시락은 갈수록 착해지네요 삼덕통닭 삼미, 삼덕, 파닭 노랑통닭 신메뉴two 콤비네이션 중국 대련 본토의 꿔바로우 포장 답십리 막국수, 군만두와 닭무침 창원 70년 전통 중국집 도쿄 닛포리 오뎅 포장마차 포항 웅피 북방대합전골. 새롭게 알거나 생각나는대로 추가할 예정이고요, 혹시 제가 빼먹은 것이나 틀린 것이 있다면 댓글로 알려주시면 감사하겠습니다. 7살 차이 디시

737961 22 456 0 창작번역 무제 쿠나린 2021. 코스 옷 입고 야스하는거요 글쓴 ㅇㅇ. 미드 나르코스는 총 시즌이 5개에요, 2015년 8월 15일 시즌 1을 시작으로 진행형이에요. 코네 게시글 페이지 따거 자료는 광고박힌 720p가 많아서 광고없는 1080p로 최대한 구해서 교체함. 14 0037 근데 인싸존잘들은 서코가면 진짜로 오프코스파코함.

@joajoa_gaedong 나두 계속 검색해봤는데 안보여서ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 20231102 001906 코스파코 스타편 말하는거인듯 원래 폰헓에도 있었는데 코스파코 그룹이 접으면서 불법 업로드된거 죄다 날리고 접어서 꽤 많이 썰려나감 그래도 남아는 있다 20231102 031113 054721. 새롭게 알거나 생각나는대로 추가할 예정이고요, 혹시 제가 빼먹은 것이나 틀린 것이 있다면 댓글로 알려주시면 감사하겠습니다. 근데 코스파2코 뭔말임 코스프레 만담 미니 갤러리. 약 140기가걍 꼴리는대로 모은거라 없는게 더 많음. 약 140기가걍 꼴리는대로 모은거라 없는게 더 많음.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.