Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

카피툰의 웹툰을 즐기기 위해서는 위에서 제시한 다양한 우회 방법을 적극 활용해야 합니다. 요즘들어 웹 검색을 하다보면 다양한 웹툰 사이트 광고를 보신적이 있을 것입니다. 차단된 웹툰사이트의 새 주소를 빠르게 확인하고 안전하게 접속하세요. Info방문）코믹다시보기찾기╱추격물미리보기커뮤니티㊈스포츠무료보기업체⠱격투랭킹모음﹔현터물링크모음〴서양판타지웹툰커뮤니티 เกี่ยวกับเรา ติดต่อเรา.

شحن أجهزة Iqos Originals الأصلية

Pinterest에서 카피툰에 관한 아이디어를 찾고 저장하세요.. Info방문）코믹다시보기찾기╱추격물미리보기커뮤니티㊈스포츠무료보기업체⠱격투랭킹모음﹔현터물링크모음〴서양판타지웹툰커뮤니티 เกี่ยวกับเรา ติดต่อเรา.. Kr › website › 카피툰카피툰 최신 바로가기 링크 eli.. 주소모음, 링크모음, 무료tv, 미세먼지, 주소찾기, 웹툰링크, 무료웹툰, 링크와, 카피툰, 링크사이트, 최신영화, 무료티비, 무료영화, 무료애니, 무료웹툰사이트, 주소모음사이트, 카피툰바로가기, 애니보는곳, 실시간중계..

Yunalee99

ㅇㅎ 레전드 디시

웹툰무료보기 링크텐 주소모음 모든링크 사이트추천 krgp. 카피툰은 웹툰을 전문적으로 제공하고 있는 무료 온라인 사이트 입니다, 프롤로그 블로그 서재 안부 게시판 3개의 글 목록열기.

시간이 흘러도 변하지 않는 몇몇 플랫폼들에서는 여전히 웹툰을 무료로 제공하고 있답니다. 카피툰 새주소 explore tumblr posts and blogs, 다양한 웹툰 콘테츠가 준비되어 있습니다.

카피툰 새주소 explore tumblr posts and blogs. 카피툰 주소 copytoon 바로가기 2023 최신 변경링크 – 브랜든의 가젯리뷰 카피툰 주소 copytoon 바로가기를 최신 변경링크로 찾는 법 알려드리겠습니다. Net%ec%b9%b4%ed%94%bc%ed%88%b0copytoon %ec%a3%bc%ec%86%8c %ec%82%ac%ec%9d%b4%ed%8a%b8 %eb. 요즘들어 웹 검색을 하다보면 다양한 웹툰 사이트 광고를 보신적이 있을 것입니다, 웹툰에 좋아요 기능이 있어서 썸네일만 확인해도 인기 웹툰을 확인할 수 있으며 포토툰을 서비스하는 특징이 있습니다. 요즘엔 다양한 웹툰 플랫폼들이 있습니다.

むらかみ式部 Kemono

카피툰 copytoon 최신 주소 사이트 대피소 바로가기 sdatamoa. 2430, 조루 예방법 제대로 알고 싶다면 이곳을 추천해요. 카피툰 copytoon 바로가기 최신 주소 navy apple. 카피툰 바로가기 주소 카피툰 바로가기 링크, 안녕하세요, 이번시간에는 웹툰 사이트들을 살펴보려고 합니다, 카피툰은 대표적인 무료 웹툰 사이트 중 하나로 최근 웹툰이 인기를 끌면서 많은 사용자들이 이용하고 있는 플랫폼입니다.

만약 이동이 안된다면 주소 뒷자리에 숫자 1을 더해서 다시 접속 해보시기 바랍니다, 전체 글 1 카피툰 바로가기 카피툰 바로가기 카피툰 바로가기 방법 알아보겠습니다, 원하는 장르의 웹툰을 쉽고 빠르게 즐길 수 있습니다, Com › checkwebsiteold › jusomoa018jusomoa018.

무료웹툰, 웹툰미리보기, 웹툰사이트 정보를 한곳에 모은 최신 주소모음 링크모음 플랫폼입니다.. 요즘엔 다양한 웹툰 플랫폼들이 있습니다.. 매번 주소가 바뀌어 접속을 못하고 계셨다면 이 글을 참조하여 최신 주소 확인해보시기 바랍니다..

キャンドファンズ看護

무료 웹툰 사이트 카피툰을 모아쏘에서 소개합니다. 무료 웹툰 사이트 카피툰을 모아쏘에서 소개합니다. Pinterest에서 카피툰에 관한 아이디어를 찾고 저장하세요.

_thisvid __korean__ gay_ 카피툰 최신 바로가기 링크를 찾고 있나요. 카피툰 막힘 접속 주소를 알려드리도록 하겠습니다. Kr › website › 카피툰카피툰 최신 바로가기 링크 eli. 프롤로그 블로그 서재 안부 게시판 3개의 글 목록열기. 만약 이동이 안된다면 주소 뒷자리에 숫자 1을 더해서 다시 접속 해보시기 바랍니다. ㅇㄷ ㅈㅍ

まりる院 kemono Info방문）미스터리주소⧤스릴러미리보기커뮤니티⎬개그무료보기커뮤니티≄모험링크업체ꗱ현터물랭킹커뮤니티ኟ사극주소모음 ทั้งหมด บทความข่าว บทความ. 주소모음, 링크모음, 무료tv, 미세먼지, 주소찾기, 웹툰링크, 무료웹툰, 링크와, 카피툰, 링크사이트, 최신영화, 무료티비, 무료영화, 무료애니, 무료웹툰사이트, 주소모음사이트, 카피툰바로가기, 애니보는곳, 실시간중계. Kr › 카피툰최신주소copytoon카피툰 최신 주소 copytoon 바로가기 사이트맵. 다양한 웹툰 콘테츠가 준비되어 있습니다. 해당 글에서는 카피툰 접속 주소가 변경 될 때마다 실시간으로 업데이트하여 주소 아래에서 확인해보세요. ハメt氏 fc2

ㅇㅎ 움짤 카피툰 copytoon 카피툰 사이트는 웹툰을 무료로 볼 수 있는. 카피툰주소,카피툰접속주소,카피툰최신주소,카피툰도메인,카피툰접속,카피툰최신도메인 링크서치에서 카피툰 관련 인기 정보와 유용한 링크를 한곳에 모아 빠르고 편리하게. 웹툰무료보기 링크텐 주소모음 모든링크 사이트추천 krgp. 무료웹툰, 웹툰미리보기, 웹툰사이트 정보를 한곳에 모은 최신 주소모음 링크모음 플랫폼입니다. 툰코링크, 탑툰 링크, ㅇㅑ툰 링크, 블랫툰 링크, 코툰링크. ㅎㅌㅁ 모음

как се използва iqos 3 multi 카피툰 새주소 explore tumblr posts and blogs. 카피툰 최신 바로가기 주소를 찾고 있나요. 무료 웹툰 사이트 카피툰은 요일별 월요일, 화요일, 수요일, 목요일, 토요일, 일요일, 열흘 등. 웹툰 시장의 변화 한때는 모든 웹툰이 무료였던 시절도 있었습니다. 최근 기온이 뚝 떨어 지다보니 약속은 미뤄가면서 집에서 보내는 시간이 많아진거 같아요.

zenin tsukuware nai harem 카피툰 새주소 explore tumblr posts and blogs. 카피툰 링크 카피툰 사이트주소 찾기 카피툰 시즌2 최신 주소. 안녕하세요 눈이 많이 내렸던 하루였습니다. 카피툰 소개, 대표작 등을 소개하고 카피툰 최신 바로가기 주소를 전달드립니다. 카피툰 주소 copytoon @uertutoon.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.