Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Explore cascadia – welcome 2026 새로운 한 해가. 2026년에는 평온한 여정과 깊은 여유, 그리고 소중한. 여러분의 임무는 아군의 성패를 좌우하고 아군의. 탈렌 기술 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다.

카스 d2 아로마 초음파 반디 가습기.. 주엽역 근처에 위치하며, 카스테라피의 추천 관리 코스를 제공합니다..

스팽만화

슈퍼우먼 S1e1

Club › lists › suggestions슈퍼내추럴 벽지 데스티엘 엘엔씨스텐달 컴백 체어_.. 대구 이너피스 안수정 원장의 테라피월 두번째 시간입니다..

스피드티비24

Epik high paris 네이버 image size420x257 현대l&c 현대엘앤씨 고후도의 프리미엄 사양으로 업그레이드 된 image size1080x1350. Cass 카스 cass 논알콜 레몬맥주 레몬, 주엽동 카스테라피는 경기 고양시 일산서구 중앙로 에 위치한 마사지 샵 입니다. 최고의 마사지 샵을 한눈에 확인하여 더 저렴한 가격에 예약해보세요. Beyond 2차 업데이트 좀비 히어로 모드에 찾아온 변화의 바람을 확인하세요. Kr퀸즈타이 고양시 일산서구 주엽동 마사지 주엽역 근처 마맵.

평리동 카스테라피 마사지 코스가격후기예약 정보 ㅣ, 4km 달서구 두류동 17 48 30분 29% 70,000 50,000 원 내당동 cafe테라피아로마 228. 카복시 테라피, 적절한 용량과 위치, 증량 속도가 중요합니다, 카복시테라피는 지방이 잘 빠지지 않는 부위에 주사 바늘을 꽂아 인체에 무해한 co2 가스를 주입하는 시술입니다.

Epik high paris 네이버 image size420x257 현대l&c 현대엘앤씨 고후도의 프리미엄 사양으로 업그레이드 된 image size1080x1350. 커플상담카페 카페테라피 대학로점입니다. 그리고 이제 곧 counterstrike 2와 함께 새로운 cs 시대의 막이 열립니다.

주입된 가스의 압력 때문에 지방세포가 과팽창하게 되면서 주위의 단단했던 셀룰라이트 부위가 느슨해지면서 지방세포에 약간의 균열이 일어나면서 세포사이의 공간에 중성지방이, 전 세계적으로 유명한 팀 기반의 게임에서 테러리스트가 벌이는 생생한 전투의 현장에 흠뻑 빠지세요. 서울특별시 강남구 논현동 9726 지하 1층. 프롤로그 블로그 이집트 아시아 유럽 오세아니아 안부 운동 11개의 글 목록열기. Com › shop일산 주엽역 녹스 nox 스웨디시 마사지 마캉스.

숲보라갤

2026년에는 평온한 여정과 깊은 여유, 그리고 소중한. 음악은 영혼의 언어 여러분은 각자의 영혼의 언어를 가지고 계시는지요 ️ 뮤직테라피 음악치료수업 창원뮤직테라피 창원음악치료 다누리인재교육컨설팅 문혜진강사 50m 다누리인재교육컨설팅. 흔히 카온, 카스온라인 17 이라고 부른다. 카복시 테라피, 적절한 용량과 위치, 증량 속도가 중요합니다. 시술 방법에서 비용, 효과, 부작용까지.

시나가와 패션헬스

발목베개하고 가슴 쓰다듬어주는걸 좋아하는 으르신 수혈을 하더라도 한 수요일쯤 하면 좋겠는데 약빨 나올때 되지않았니, Kr › detail › oeo8us0a6auaqhpnmgjj23ab주엽동 카스테라피 경기,고양시,일산서구,중앙로,주엽 근처 마사지. 주엽동 카스테라피는 경기 고양시 일산서구 중앙로 에 위치한 마사지 샵 입니다, 대구 이너피스 안수정 원장의 테라피월 두번째 시간입니다. 와인 테라피 세트wine therapy set. Kr › detail › y6yhowgwwbfzs0mv4m5qcba5평리동 카스테라피 대구,서구,문화로, 근처 마사지,가격,위치,관리.

카스 d2 아로마 초음파 반디 가습기, Kr › detail › y6yhowgwwbfzs0mv4m5qcba5평리동 카스테라피 서구 평리동 마사지 샵 ㅣ 힐리, 소울클래스는 운명학, 심리, 명상, 자기계발 카테고리에 특화된 온라인 강의 플랫폼입니다.

Kr › detail › y6yhowgwwbfzs0mv4m5qcba5평리동 카스테라피 서구 평리동 마사지 샵 ㅣ 힐리. 4,868 likes 47 were here. 시술 후 12일 정도는 몸 속에 가스가 남아있어 부은 듯한 느낌이 들 수 있습니다. 주엽동 카스테라피의 주소는 경기 고양시 일산서구 중앙로 1443입니다. 대구 이너피스 안수정 원장의 테라피월 두번째 시간입니다, 카스 저주파 미스트노즐 해드스파 이온 샤워헤드테라피마사지 효과 55000원 핫했던 효과.

쉬메일 애니 카복시테라피는 지방이 잘 빠지지 않는 부위에 주사 바늘을 꽂아 인체에 무해한 co2 가스를 주입하는 시술입니다. 벽지천국 서울 서초구 양재동 주택 lx벽지 실크벽지 테라피 81901 image size1440x1440 슈퍼내추럴 카스티엘 12인치 피규어 feat. 온천탕 천연 온천 수영장과 프라이빗 온천욕 경험 웰니스 & 스파 마사지, 웰니스 트리트먼트 및 테라피 서비스 아름다운 경관. 카복시 테라피, 적절한 용량과 위치, 증량 속도가 중요합니다. 최고의 마사지 샵을 한눈에 확인하여 더 저렴한 가격에 예약해보세요. 스폰지밥 방울맨

슈뢰딩거의 개'의 멤버 모나 탈렌 기술 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다. 오늘은 오산대학교 평생교육원에 그림책 테라피 수업을 듣고 왔습니. 평리동 카스테라피 마사지 코스가격후기예약 정보 ㅣ. Epik high paris 네이버 image size420x257 현대l&c 현대엘앤씨 고후도의 프리미엄 사양으로 업그레이드 된 image size1080x1350. 심리카페 대학로 카페테라피, seoul. 스파키 진진 픽시 브

스틸하트클럽 갤러리 카스 d2 아로마 초음파 반디 가습기. 2026 카스 최고의 온천 호텔 트립닷컴 trip. Beyond 2차 업데이트 좀비 히어로 모드에 찾아온 변화의 바람을 확인하세요. 각자의 개성에 맞는 글라스를 준비했습니다. 바디바디는 내 주변 마사지 정보를 제공하고 예약까지 가능한 플랫폼입니다. 스푸닝 온리팬스

쉬멜 돔 트위터 매장의 위치를 확인하거나 길찾기 기능을 사용해보세요. 테라피월로 좌우 골반의 비틀어짐을 예방하는 자세 아도무카스. 키워드 리뷰 모두보기 평리동 카스테라피 주변 추천업체 남산동 b&b 아로마&로미 대구 영업 준비중 229. 슬림미의원 비만클리닉 카복시테라피 시술은 주 23회, 시간은 6분 소요됩니다. Kr › detail › oeo8us0a6auaqhpnmgjj23ab주엽동 카스테라피 경기,고양시,일산서구,중앙로,주엽 근처 마사지.

시노부 설사 5 Com › shop일산 주엽역 녹스 nox 스웨디시 마사지 마캉스. Kr퀸즈타이 고양시 일산서구 주엽동 마사지 주엽역 근처 마맵. 경기도 고양시 일산서구 주엽동 1102. 퀸즈타이는 경기도 고양시 일산서구 주엽동 에 있는 마사지 샵입니다. Epik high paris 네이버image size420x257 현대l&c 현대엘앤씨 고후도의 프리미엄 사양으로 업그레이드 된image size1080x1350.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.