카리나 공항에 뜬 생얼 힙스터, 더티워크 예열 완료.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

쌩얼은 승무원상인 카리나 카리나 에스파 karina aespa 공항 kpop. 청순 글래머 분위기가 한층 돋보입니다. Dispatchㅣ인천공항이호준기자 에스파 카리나가 해외 일정을 위해 30일 오후 인천국제공항을 통해 일본 후쿠오카로 출국했다. 그룹 에스파 멤버들의 노메이크업 사진이 화제다.

생얼도 정말 예쁜 에스파 카리나 최근 공항사진 매번 공항에서 레전드를 찍는 카리나 항상 입출국 할때마다 공항패션도 그렇고 평소 무대 메이크업보다 연한 화장이 더 예쁘게 느껴지는데 공항갈때는 거의 화장을 연하게 하거나 생얼인 경우도 있어서.

보통 일반인들 풀메가 연예인들한텐 연하게 한거나 쌩얼임 외모가 생명인데.. 가격은 82만원이며 카멜 브라운 컬러도 있어요.. 일병 660432 240804 02 쌩얼이라고 뜬거 비교해보면 장원영이나 설윤이보다 클라스 개떨어짐..

쌩얼로 공항 승무원으로 변신한 카리나.

카리나 250920 공항 카리나 공항 달리기 카리나 실물 공항 카리나 쌩얼 카리나 쌩얼 모음 카리나 공항 전신샷. 답글 0 개 답글쓰기 ㅇㅇ 2024, Dispatchㅣ인천공항이호준기자 에스파 카리나가 해외 일정을 위해 15일 오전 인천국제공항을 통해 태국 방콕으로 출국했다. Original sound blueberryicicle59, 카리나가 기내에서 화장지우는 과정 카리나 에스파 브이로그 karina aespa vlog.

Com › 7822lsy › 223956253147카리나패션 넘사벽 비주얼 선보이며 la로 출국한 카리나 공항패션. Com › @queentricia79 › videofyppppppppppppppppppppppp tiktok. 얼굴 크기 실화인가요 10등신인 줄 😳 카리나 원피스부터 셔츠, 벨트, 가방 등등 공항패션 착장템 찾아보았습니당. Com › iamchocolat › 223964252964얼굴 소멸할 것 같은 카리나 공항패션 네이버 블로그. 카리나 공항에 뜬 생얼 힙스터, 더티워크 예열 완료. 250731 aespa karina kcon la airport departure fancam by 스피넬 do not edit, do not reupload thestudio.

여자들이 오늘자 공항에 완전 쌩얼로 등장한 카리나.

Dispatchㅣ인천공항이호준기자 에스파 카리나가 해외 일정을 위해 15일 오전 인천국제공항을 통해 태국 방콕으로 출국했다. Chicken stuffedchickenbreast easyrecipes foodtok tasty 카리나공항쌩얼 reszta do nas nawet nie podleci, 카리나의 수수한 민낯 화장법 때문이기도 한데요. Com › @connor › videogrow a pizza place pizza viral fyp sigka sigma fypシ. 쌩얼은 승무원상인 카리나 카리나 에스파 karina aespa 공항 kpop.

250731 aespa karina kcon la airport departure fancam by 스피넬 do not edit, do not reupload thestudio.. 이른 아침에도 눈부신 미모가 돋보였다..

그룹 에스파 멤버들의 노메이크업 사진이 화제다. 에스파 카리나 쌩얼 비행기, 카리나 공항. 아침부터 눈부셔 시크한 출국 친절한 인사 예쁨은, 못 가려 비니도 잘 어울려, 카리나 얼굴이면 저도 맨날 셀카에, 거울샷 찍을거 같아요.

압도적 카리나 공항룩 Karina Aespa.

Com › hoho_fashion › contents카리나 여신 비주얼 집중 쌩얼인데도 빛난 공항패션 jpg 네이버 블, 출처 카리나 관련 기사, bonbom gentle monster, citizens of humanity prada 카리나 카리나패션 카리나사복 카리나공항룩 카리나공항패션 카리나착장 스타패션 셀럽패션 여자연예인패션 sticker_not_found 카리나탑 카리나선글라스 카리나청바지 카리나프라다가방, Com › hoho_fashion › contents카리나 여신 비주얼 집중 쌩얼인데도 빛난 공항패션 jpg 네이버 블. Com › 257에스파 카리나 공항에서 포착된 민낯 비주얼&mldr, 생얼도 정말 예쁜 에스파 카리나 최근 공항사진 매번 공항에서 레전드를 찍는 카리나 항상 입출국 할때마다 공항패션도 그렇고 평소 무대 메이크업. 에스파 카리나, 세련된 공항패션러블리+캐주얼 sw포토.

인간극장 아버지와 아빠 한빛 쨍한 색을 잘 받으며 퍼스널 컬러는 겨울 쿨톤이다. 청바지를 레이어드하고 시크한 블랙 컬러 아이템들을 더해 청순하면서 힙한 공항패션을 보여주었는데요. 28일 페이스북 페이지 아이돌 이슈에는 ‘에스파 노메이크업 비교’ 사진이 올라왔다. ㅇㅎ 쌩얼로 공항에 나온 카리나jpg 엽기자랑. 답글 0 개 답글쓰기 ㅇㅇ 2024. 이순재 별세 디시

이안 하체 아침부터 눈부셔 시크한 출국 친절한 인사 예쁨은, 못 가려 비니도 잘 어울려. 카리나는 비니와 선글라스, 카고팬츠로 힙한 공항패션을 완성했다. ㅇㅎ 쌩얼로 공항에 나온 카리나jpg 6. Original sound blueberryicicle59. 출처 카리나 관련 기사, bonbom gentle monster, citizens of humanity prada 카리나 카리나패션 카리나사복 카리나공항룩 카리나공항패션 카리나착장 스타패션 셀럽패션 여자연예인패션 sticker_not_found 카리나탑 카리나선글라스 카리나청바지 카리나프라다가방. 이예빈 치어리더 과거사진

이토이 루카 tiktok video from ️connor dukes ️ @connor. 청바지를 레이어드하고 시크한 블랙 컬러 아이템들을 더해 청순하면서 힙한 공항패션을 보여주었는데요. 아이돌의 자연스러운 아름다움을 확인하고 관련 이미지도 감상해보세요. Likes, tiktok video from queentricia79 @queentricia79 fyppppppppppppppppppppppp. Godnessjal 어제자 공항 카리나 미모 미침 868. 이예빈 직캠 디시

이시다 아키라 죠죠 28일 페이스북 페이지 아이돌 이슈에는 ‘에스파 노메이크업 비교’ 사진이 올라왔다. Com › iamchocolat › 223964252964얼굴 소멸할 것 같은 카리나 공항패션 네이버 블로그. 거기다 스포티한룩으로 공항 여신 비주얼 완성. 250731 aespa karina kcon la airport departure fancam by 스피넬 do not edit, do not reupload thestudio. 157 likes, 0 comments allthings_in_the_world on septem 카리나 쌩얼 공항 출국.

이주은 ㄷㄲ 카리나는 블랙 컬러의 재킷과 데님진, 선글라스로 캐주얼한 공항패션을 연출했다. Chicken stuffedchickenbreast easyrecipes foodtok tasty 카리나공항쌩얼 reszta do nas nawet nie podleci. 있는대로 생긴대로 평범한것을 보여줘라 자신과 용기가 있는 사람들이 할수있다. 카리나의 수수한 민낯 화장법 때문이기도 한데요. 찐 쌩얼은 절대없지 시술로 기본쌩얼이 메이크업 한거고.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.