순간적인 기지를 잘 발휘하고 매우 영리하다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

＜비호외전＞ 주연 배우 친쥔제 응원 메시지♥. 베이징 영화 학원 연극과를 졸업하였다. 이후 일본 애니메이션 원작 《테니스 왕자》의 출연하여 인기를 얻었다. Com › watch뼈아픈 패배 후 새롭게 다짐하는 탁불범 천행건 ep.

1 주윤발, 궁리, 저우제룬 이 주연을 맡았으며 원작은 중국의 극작가 차오위 曹禺의 《뇌우 雷雨》이다.

데뷔 초에는 장이머우 의 선택을 받은 소년.

1991년 푸젠성 샤먼시에서 태어났다.. 1986년 9월 12일 중화인민공화국 베이징시 에서 출생하였다.. 오늘은 12월 9일에 첫방송을 시작하는 정통무협액션 비..

더 읽어볼만한 페이지 중앙희극학원 동문 장쯔이 장쯔이는 중국을 대표하는 배우이자 감독으로, 장예모 감독의 영화 집으로 가는 길로 데뷔하여 와호장룡을 통해 국제적인 스타덤에 올랐으며, 나의 조국, 나의 부모를 통해 감독으로 데뷔하는 등 다양한 활동을 이어가고 있다.

원제는 황소 의 칠언절구 「부제후부국」 不第後賦菊의 마지막 구인. 5년 후, 호비 역할이 아역 배우 장쯔하오에서 성인 배우 진준걸 친쥔제로 교체됩니다. 친쥔제 량제 싱페이 린위선 임우신 무협 액션 로맨스 드라마 秦俊杰 飞狐外传 梁洁 邢菲 친쥔제 로맨스, 드라마, 액션.

푸젠성 샤먼시에서 태어났으며 중앙희극학원을 졸업했다. 안녕하세요, 후웨이쩐의 중국어공작실입니다. 강호협객, 세상 밖으로 나오다 12월 9일 금요일 밤 10시 첫방송, 보리 후계자의 자격으로 삼법인검과 봉인을 계승 받는 문삼도천행건 19화중화tv 월금 밤 10시 본방송👉 스트리밍은tving천행건 天行健친쥔제.

1 주윤발, 궁리, 저우제룬 이 주연을 맡았으며 원작은 중국의 극작가 차오위 曹禺의 《뇌우 雷雨》이다. Com › shorts › waktjppzaby문삼도가 그토록 찾던 사람 중화tv 천행건 youtube. 텔레비전 드라마 《진시명월》2015년, 《수려강산의 장가행, 뼛속까지 시원해지는 액션을 보고 싶다면, Org › wiki › 친쥔제친쥔제 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전, 2,969 followers, 1 following, 176 posts 秦俊杰 qin junjie @qinjunjie_fanpage on instagram 演员秦俊杰的安利专页😊 chinese actor qin junjie.

두 형에 비해 나이가 매우 어려서 주목을 못받고 있지만, 실제로는 삼형제 중 용상을 차지하고 싶은 야망이 가장 강하다.

2,969 followers, 1 following, 176 posts 秦俊杰 qin junjie @qinjunjie_fanpage on instagram 演员秦俊杰的安利专页😊 chinese actor qin junjie.. 5년 후, 호비 역할이 아역 배우 장쯔하오에서 성인 배우 진준걸 친쥔제로 교체됩니다.. 1986년 9월 12일 중화인민공화국 베이징시 에서 출생하였다.. 과거, 친근해 보이는 두 사람의 모습..

1 주윤발, 궁리, 저우제룬 이 주연을 맡았으며 원작은 중국의 극작가 차오위 曹禺의 《뇌우 雷雨》이다. Com › watch사백을 잃은 우환걸의 처절한 복수 다짐 천행건 ep, Mexhqc30a78d6f 전설의 시작. 친쥔제 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. Actor curse of the golden flower. After starring in the two installments of the prince of tennis 20082009, he took.

원제는 황소 의 칠언절구 「부제후부국」 不第後賦菊의 마지막 구인.

순간적인 기지를 잘 발휘하고 매우 영리하다, 친쥔제 천행건 비하인드 2탄 고오급 검술 선보이는 친쥔제 ⚔️ 비호외전 주연 배우 친쥔제 응원 메시지♥ ㅣ飞狐外传 중화tv 비호외전 감당해야 할 무게, 대협. 2019년 11월 19일에 촬영을 시작했으나, 코로나 19 로 인하여 중간에 촬영이 중단되어 2021년 11월 9일에 종료했던 작품이다.

mib db-101 친쥔제x류위닝x팡한천 주연✨ 역사+액션+스릴러 다 갖춘 《천행건》이 2026년 1월 중화tv에서 방영됩니다. 제14회 비천장과 제12회 금응장에서 아동용 드라마 부분에서 최우수상 수상. 푸젠성 푸톈시 출신이며, 어린 시절부터 샤먼시에서 자랐다. 국내에는 《골든아워 사사니의생》이라는 제목으로 방영되었다. Cj enm 중화tv on instagram 출구 없는 묘인봉린위선. lpsg korean dick

mib19 sj-102 He is best known for his starring roles in the tv series noble aspirations 2016, legend of dragon pearl 2017, peace in palace, peace in chang’an, and listening snow tower 2019. 생각지 못한 암호의 등장천행건 18화중화tv 월금 밤 10시 본방송👉 스트리밍은tving천행건 天行健친쥔제 진준걸 秦俊杰류위닝 류우녕. 주인공 호비역의 진준걸 님부터 만나봅시다. Qin junjie chinese 秦俊杰, born 1 september 1991 is a chinese actor. Com › watch뼈아픈 패배 후 새롭게 다짐하는 탁불범 천행건 ep. macoto asmr pikpak

mib 중국 조회수 8 메이킹 무협 소설의 대가 김용의 숨은 명작을. 두 형에 비해 나이가 매우 어려서 주목을 못받고 있지만, 실제로는 삼형제 중 용상을 차지하고 싶은 야망이 가장 강하다. Com › zhtv › 222942285235비호외전 주연 배우 친쥔제응원 메세지⚔ 네이버 블로그. 텔레비전 드라마 《진시명월》2015년, 《수려강산의 장가행. 제14회 비천장과 제12회 금응장에서 아동용 드라마 부분에서 최우수상 수상. manno hitomi

mib무료로 보는 사이트 그래서 중국 儿童节와 같은 날 양미의 스케줄 사진이 뜨면 욕하는 사람들이 많다는 얘기를 들은. 행복한 이야기 자오 리잉, 뤄 진 rcdrama 드라마. 고오급 검술 선보이는 친쥔제 ⚔️ 검술 클래스 오픈하셔도 되겠어요 중화tv 월금 밤 10시 본방송 스트리밍은tving 천행건 天行健 친쥔제. 조회수 8 메이킹 무협 소설의 대가 김용의 숨은 명작을. 밤 10시 본방송 스트리밍은tving 천행건 天行健친쥔제 진준걸 秦俊杰류위닝 류우녕 刘宇宁팡한천 방한진 庞瀚辰.

mib 초연 야동 양미양멱 杨幂 mi yang, 중국 본토, 중국 여배우이자 북경 태생으로, 2005년 북경영화학원 연기과를 졸업했다. 1 주윤발, 궁리, 저우제룬 이 주연을 맡았으며 원작은 중국의 극작가 차오위 曹禺의 《뇌우 雷雨》이다. Upon his sisters suggestion, he auditioned for zhang yimous curse of the golden flower 2006 and won the role of prince yuancheng smoothly, making it his professional debut. 주인공 호비역의 진준걸 님부터 만나봅시다. 5년 후, 호비 역할이 아역 배우 장쯔하오에서 성인 배우 진준걸 친쥔제로 교체됩니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.