Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

복희 뿌애미 슴꾸구 최지우남편등 핱고닉들 있을때는 밸런스유지 잘됬는데 최지우 남편소문은 안좋은데 최지우는행복한가봐 계속 웃상이야. 최지우 남편될 사람으로서 단도리 잘 못해 죄송합니다. 이에 남편 이현호 씨의 직업과 과거 모텔, 호스트 등의 논란이 재조명되고 있습니다. 가족 배우자 이서호 2018년 결혼 현재3 딸 이루아.

Myfans Secret_japan 4p

한국 여자아이돌 일반 최지우 남편 되는게 꿈인데 어떻게하면 가능함.. 배우 최지우가 출산 후 엄마로서의 삶에 대해 털어놓으며 근황을 전했습니다.. 유튜브 채널 가로세로연구소이하 가세연에서는 9일 한예슬 무조건 no라는 제목의 영상을 게재했다..

Missav 랙

Misa Yuki

Missxkr.com

환희 가수님 발라드 트롯 롹 하고픈거 다해요라는 팬들의.. 엘라 비주얼로 맥심 콘테스트 돌풍 21 김수현 향한 ‘광고주 손절 포비아’ 확산피소액 60억원 돌파 0.. 최근 방송된 채널a 풍문으로 들었쇼이하 풍문쇼에서 최지우에 대한.. 최지우는 1975년생으로 올해 47세다..

Missav 111

이에 최지우의 연하 남편 이현호의 나이, 직업, 집안까지 관심이 쏠리고 있습니다. Com › board › view최지우남편10살연하 호빠선수 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리. 최지우 남편될 사람으로서 단도리 잘 못해 죄송합니다.

최지우남편도 존나 불쌍하긴했음걍 좀 바보처럼 핱 애들 빠는글 쓰던 고닉인데 믹서기들 새벽에 몰려와서 분탕칠때 화내는거 처음봄 아니 믹서기,음갤 저격하는거보고피싸, 11세종줌 왜 저러나 했는데 최지우남편글 보니 알겠더라 최지우남편 사진올려놓고 자플로 이진욱까질한 자플댓은 실형감였음 최지우빠몰이 이진욱빠몰, 극비리에 결혼식을 올린만큼 남편 이현호의 사진은. 해당드라마가 1994년 11월 종영했음을 감안했을때 최소 1994년 mbc드라마 데뷔. Com › salgoo921212 › 223835444145최지우 결혼, 출산 후 근황에 남편 이현호 직업, 모텔, 호스트, 대. 한 번 사는 인생, 내가 젛아하는 사람과 read more.

mypikpak asmr 그는 아내 미라가 아들을 살리기 위해 세상과 치열하게 싸우는 동안, 뒤에서 묵묵히 가족을 지탱하며 든든한 버팀목이 되어주는 인물이다. 니네 주인 더듬어만진당 닮아가지고 내로남불임. 배우 최지우가 출산 후 엄마로서의 삶에 대해 털어놓으며 근황을 전했습니다. 이미지최지우 노산이라 늙음 긷갤러 211. 최지우 남편될 사람으로서 단도리 잘 못해 죄송합니다. muripoyo

myfans 072q 이에 남편 이현호 씨의 직업과 과거 모텔, 호스트 등의 논란이 재조명되고 있습니다. 최지우의 남편은 9살 연하로, 그가 연애를 시작하면서 이름을 개명했다고 보도했다. 배우 최지우 남편에 대한 충격적인 진실 공개. 배우로서는 중견의 위치로 접어든 40대 중반부터 본격적으로 이름을 알리기 시작했고, 50대에 비로소 연기 인생에 꽃이 피었다. 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 121. mosaic censorship 뜻

missav jab 불편함을 드린 점 진심으로 사과드립니다. 가족 배우자 이서호 2018년 결혼 현재3 딸 이루아. 가수 환희가 7월 8일 종료된 디시트렌드 트로트 남자 부문 인기투표에서 1위를 차지했다. 엘라 비주얼로 맥심 콘테스트 돌풍 21 김수현 향한 ‘광고주 손절 포비아’ 확산피소액 60억원 돌파 0. 최지우74 남편85 11살차이 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리. missav 呪術

montagem xonada 뜻 환희, r&b에서 트로트까지 장르 확장 성공디시트렌드 1위. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 스포츠월드최정아 기자 최지우의 남편 얼굴이 한 유튜브 채널에 의해 공개된 가운데 최지우 남편에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다. 이에 최지우의 연하 남편 이현호의 나이, 직업, 집안까지 관심이 쏠리고 있습니다. 드라마 한지붕세가족에 성숙미라는 역의 아가씨로 출연했다. 이미지최지우 노산이라 늙음 긷갤러 211.

mtr 망가 일반 그냥 최지우 보고나면 머릿속이 결혼이라는 말로 도배됨. 11세종줌 왜 저러나 했는데 최지우남편글 보니 알겠더라 최지우남편 사진올려놓고 자플로 이진욱까질한 자플댓은 실형감였음 최지우빠몰이 이진욱빠몰. 배우 최지우가 일상을 공개하면서 남편에 대한 관심이 뜨겁다. 강용석 변호사가 최지우 남편이 호스트였던 과거를 폭로한 유튜브 채널 가로세로연구소의 방송은 타당했다고 주장했다. 당시 디스패치는 최지우의 남편은 1984년생인 이모 씨로 확인됐다며 1975년생인 최지우.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.