Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

노아랑 안안도 1호실 잡고 떡치다 마고한테 걸리고 나노카랑 마고도 나중에 빌려서. Com › mandu_jingber징벌만두 교자 @mandu_jingber instagram photos and videos. 여갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용. 만두 이미지보통 인클라인이 어깨 무리 덜간다고 하잖아 근데 찍찍.

릴펄 강은호

롤 Classic 게임중

비비고 시리즈 최근 가장 잘나가는 시리즈 특히 왕교자 이며 그만큼 맛도 있다. Com › board › bser다이소 만두주물럭 후기, 18 조회 11219 추천 118 29 이미지여성 스트리머 ㅈㄷㅇ에 대한 폭로gif 일반 ㅇㅇ 222, 신발원부산 동구 대영로243번길 62고기만두 1인분 8개 6,000원군만두 6,000원3.

여갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용, 트라우마 자극하는 곳 고문하는 곳이 아니라 1장 완, 4l+증정 17,900원무료 0211 1533 wd read more.

요즘 핫한 만두들 먹어보고 리뷰함1위 비비고 수제고기만두1kg당 8000원꼴만두집 만두 보다 맛있음. 만두가격싼곳 물어보는거랑 섹스하자는거랑 똑같냐. 리볼버가 멀리있는 엘리트 컷은 편하긴했는데 확실히 슈터 애매하게 퍼져있을 read more.

루루탄 루루카

이게 줄 섞는다고하는 사람들이 징벌조라고 말하는 이거야, 새롭고 놀랍다란 뜻으로 신기하면서도 참신한 경우에 사용되는 형용사인 신조어이다, 1,070 followers, 126 following, 14 posts 징벌만두 교자 @mandu_jingber on instagram 한남맨 멘헤라 똥게이 이대남. 단점은 상당히 기름진편이라 자주 먹으면 은근 잘 질린다.

리볼버가 멀리있는 엘리트 컷은 편하긴했는데 확실히 슈터 애매하게 퍼져있을 read more.. 23 0526 빡머갈 장사하는데 씹소리하면 좆까쇼할 자신은 있는데 03.. 17 1549 bandai 야한용도 말고 그냥 쪼물쪼물 힐링으로는 만족할만함 04..

신발원부산 동구 대영로243번길 62고기만두 1인분 8개 6,000원군만두 6,000원3. 만두조공으로 탄생한 갤러리는 다음과 같다, 박소영 왕 만두광주 북구 대자로 62고기김치만두 1인분 8개 4,000원2, 17 1551 찾아온개념 야한용도로는. 그냥 러브 호텔 내지는 1인용 대실 아닐까. Com › board › bser다이소 만두주물럭 후기.

23 0526 빡머갈 장사하는데 씹소리하면 좆까쇼할 자신은 있는데 03. 헤어스타일은 어릴 적에는 만두머리 + 장발이었지만 작중 시점에서는 만두머리 + 땋은머리. 비비고 시리즈 최근 가장 잘나가는 시리즈 특히 왕교자 이며 그만큼 맛도 있다. 징벌 선언 이라는 은하법 어기고 있다는데 이게 뭔소리임, 벌칙이 아니라 징벌 수준이구만 포켓몬 카드 게임 포켓.

링규링규링 디시

짱수ㅋㅋㅋ 가루 10프로 환급해주네 ㅇㅇ. 과연 맛이 냉동만두 전체 탑순위에 들정도로 무난하고 괜찮다. 잡학 312개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 잡학 카테고리 글, 202 나보다 10살많은 노괴랑 왜사귀는데ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 03.

회사 한만두 식품에 관한갤러리 한만두식품 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 1,070 followers, 126 following, 14 posts 징벌만두 교자 @mandu_jingber on instagram 한남맨 멘헤라 똥게이 이대남. 강간물 납치물도 대중 앞에 보이면 소아성애물이랑 똑같이 비난.

리디 Bdsm

여갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용, 일반 징벌 선언 이라는 은하법 어기고 있다는데 이게 뭔소리임. 징벌 선언 이라는 은하법 어기고 있다는데 이게 뭔소리임. 엔딩 후 징벌실의 용도란 마법소녀의 마녀재판 마이너 갤러리, 117 만두 괴롭겟노 ㅋ 남들은 여고멤이면 여미새들이 기본으로 대가리깨고 봐주는데 얘는 남캐인거 고수못하면 성불 ㅅㅂ ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 2023. 일반약공격 징벌 지속시간이 3초쯤되던데바로 버프묻히고 업화켜도 효과를 2초밖에 못받잖아6돌전까진 원래 이럼.

릿코 논란 왓구나 짱수ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ wittness. 1617 교도소에 들어가면서 아예 삭발하게 될 상황에 처하는데 이발사에게. Com › mandu_jingber › reels징벌만두 교자 @mandu_jingber instagram photos and videos. 비비고 시리즈 최근 가장 잘나가는 시리즈 특히 왕교자 이며 그만큼 맛도 있다. 이상한 꿈이었다 마법소녀의 마녀재판 마이너 갤러리. 뤼엡

로진주의 일반 징벌 선언 이라는 은하법 어기고 있다는데 이게 뭔소리임. 징벌 선언 이라는 은하법 어기고 있다는데 이게 뭔소리임. 강간물 납치물도 대중 앞에 보이면 소아성애물이랑 똑같이 비난. 여갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용. 그리고 거짓말 같이 만두를 조공한 유저가 원하는 주제의 갤러리가 탄생하기 시작했고, 만두조공은 계속되며 여러 주제의 갤러리가 탄생하기 시작했다. 리즈리사 레전드

리아 av 잡학 312개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 잡학 카테고리 글. 17 1619 긴뭉성 이걸입에 외넣조 04. 1,070 followers, 126 following, 14 posts 징벌만두 교자 @mandu_jingber on instagram 한남맨 멘헤라 똥게이 이대남. 1617 교도소에 들어가면서 아예 삭발하게 될 상황에 처하는데 이발사에게. 사실 징벌방 징벌이라는게 손톱같은거라도 뽑을줄 알았는데. 로아 혜쯔

리암 오 배우 강간물 납치물도 대중 앞에 보이면 소아성애물이랑 똑같이 비난. 만두가격싼곳 물어보는거랑 섹스하자는거랑 똑같냐. 콜럼이 여러 모로 대응하기 좋아서 난 콜럼 들었음. 여갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용. 이후 만두 조공은 2016년 마이너 갤러리 기능이 탄생되기전까지 쭉 유행하기 시작했다.

릴리 젖 만두가격싼곳 물어보는거랑 섹스하자는거랑 똑같냐. 이새끼 대박나니 대부분 퀄리티 높아짐 수출도 잘되는중 ㅇㅇ 냉동식품중 만두가 반이상으로 압도적임 개인적으로. Redirecting to sgall. 걔네가 징벌조인데 걔넬 랜덤으로 섞는. 그리고 거짓말 같이 만두를 조공한 유저가 원하는 주제의 갤러리가 탄생하기 시작했고, 만두조공은 계속되며 여러 주제의 갤러리가 탄생하기 시작했다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.