Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이 운영자는 지인 능욕방 참여자들로부터 지인의 개인정보를 받아 279개의 딥페이크 영상물을 만들어 유포한 혐의를 받고 있으며, 피해자는 246명에 달하는 것으로 파악됐습니다. ‘지인 합성‘, ‘지인제보 부탁‘, ‘지인 합성, 능욕’ 등 간판을 달고 합성 사진을 만드는 계정만 수백여개에 달했다. 지인능욕이란 주변 여성의 사진을 가공해 음란물로 만들거나, 성희롱 글과 함께 사진과 개인정보를 온라인에 게시하는 것을 말한다. 탐라에 지인 빙자 사기가 기승이라는 제보가 많았는데 오늘.

통계 뿐만 아니라 실제 트위터와 텀블러 등 sns에 ‘지인능욕‘을 검색하자 수만개의 글이 등장했다.. 女동창생 지인 능욕방에 제보한 고등학생에 法 전학 처분.. 지인능욕 딥페이크 영상을 편집, 반포한 자는 성폭력처벌법상 허위영상물등의 반포등으로 처벌됩니다.. Make sure everything is spelled correctly, or try searching for a different hashtag..

Ddwrkkk Twitter

Cd 서여진

텔레그램 수사협조가 이루어졌고 체포영장에 의한 체포가 되었다는 포스팅은 이전에 한 바와 같습니다. 0000 10 10 텔레그램 지인능욕방 운영자 구속기소피해자 1,200여명 텔레그램에서 딥페이크 불법 합성 영상물을 유포한 이른바 지인 능욕방 운영자가 구속 상태로 재판에 넘겨졌습니다, 만15세 아들이 1월 트위터의 무료지인 합성 광고를 보고 11대화를 통해 텔레그램에서 지인 사진과 능욕글을 요구했습니다.

행선지 확인으로 본인인 걸 알았지만 만나고 나서 도와주기로 했지. 0000 10 10 텔레그램 지인능욕방 운영자 구속기소피해자 1,200여명 텔레그램에서 딥페이크 불법 합성 영상물을 유포한 이른바 지인 능욕방 운영자가 구속 상태로 재판에 넘겨졌습니다, 14일 경기신문 취재를 종합하면 지인을 대상으로 한 성범죄는 x옛 트위터, 텔레, 인천체고 학생 학력 인천체고 지역 대한민국 linkedin에서 지인제보님 프로필 조회, 10억 명의 회원이 있는 전문가 커뮤니티. 교복을 입은 미성년자를 대상으로 한 불법촬영 영상, 지인 제보라며 주변 지인의 일상 사진을 허위 정보와 함께 올린 게시물, 이들의 사진을.

Kr › news › endpage지인 능욕방에 내 사진&mldr. 지난해 11월 고등학생 a 양은 텔레그램 지인 능욕방에 자신의 사진과 개인정보가 올라왔다는 제보를 받았습니다. 지인제보 6 feb 2020, 1604 prev 이름 x민경 나이 23살 길가다 붙잡고 강간해도 눈까뒤집고 느끼는 인천 강간용 걸레년입니다ㅎㅎ머리끄댕이 잡고 입보지 앞보지 뒷보지 가리지말고 마음껏 사용하고 질싸한뒤 버려두세요. Kr › news › myh20240913024200641텔레그램 지인능욕방 운영자 구속기소피해자 1,200여명.

Darkyeji Erome

이 운영자는 지인 능욕방 참여자들로부터 지인의 개인정보를 받아 279개의 딥페이크 영상물을 만들어 유포한 혐의를 받고 있으며, 피해자는 246명에 달하는 것으로 파악됐습니다. 24일 조선비즈가 인터넷 커뮤니티와 sns 등에서 지인능욕 지인박제 지인제보 지인사진 등의 키워드를 검색해본 결과, 여성의 사진을 선정. 지인능욕이란 주변 여성의 사진을 가공해 음란물로 만들거나, 성희롱 글과 함께 사진과 개인정보를 온라인에 게시하는 것을 말한다.

인터넷으로도 할 수 있지만 이씨는 사이트 운영자뿐 아니라 제보자 피해자의 사진 등을 지인능욕 사이트 운영자에게 전달도 잡을 수 있는지. Sns에서 의뢰를 받아 음란 합성사진을 제작해주는 디지털성범죄 계정. 김 씨가 현금을 달러로 환전했고 월북 의사를 내비쳤다는 지인의 제보를 받고 나서였습니다, 브브걸 유정, 딥페이크 범죄 피해지인 제보로 알게 돼.

Com › replay › 2024서울지방경찰청, 피해자 246명‥지인 능욕방 운영 20대 송치. ‘지인 합성‘, ‘지인제보 부탁‘, ‘지인 합성, 능욕’ 등 간판을 달고 합성 사진을 만드는 계정만 수백여개에 달했다. 11월 25일 취재 결과, 텔레그램에는 이런 성착취, 부산경찰청 사이버범죄수사대는 텔레그램에서 이른바 지인능욕방을 운영하며 아동청소년을 포함한 피해자 12명의 딥페이크 허위영상물 275개를 제작. 이 사안에 대하여 오늘 구속영장실질심사가 있었고 구속영장이 기각되었습니다. 텔레그램에서 1,247명이 참여한 지인제보 관련된 건입니다.

2만여명이 들어와 있는 한 텔레그램 대화방에는 직업이 교사인 여성들의, 지인제보 6 feb 2020, 1604 prev 이름 x민경 나이 23살 길가다 붙잡고 강간해도 눈까뒤집고 느끼는 인천 강간용 걸레년입니다ㅎㅎ머리끄댕이 잡고 입보지 앞보지 뒷보지 가리지말고 마음껏 사용하고 질싸한뒤 버려두세요, 지인제보방은 n번방과 사건의 경중이 다른데 왜 동일시하냐 그쪽은 지인제보방 사진을 어떻게 구했냐 대가로 받는 5000. 특히 유정은 딥페이크 범죄에 관해 제 사진을 딥페이크에 이용한다는 사실을 지인 제보로 알게 됐다. 지인 제보 방에서는 일반인 여성의 얼굴 사진으로 엽기적인 합성 성착취물을 만들고, 그 밑에 신상정보와 함께 성착취 내용을 다룬 소설을 쓰는. 지난해 11월 고등학생 a 양은 텔레그램 지인 능욕방에 자신의 사진과 개인정보가 올라왔다는 제보를 받았습니다.

Kr › posts › 97499텔레그램 지인제보 구속영장 기각몰카 기소유예 로톡, 부산경찰청 사이버범죄수사대는 텔레그램에서 이른바 지인능욕방을 운영하며 아동청소년을 포함한 피해자 12명의 딥페이크 허위영상물 275개를 제작. 텔레그램 지인제보 구속영장 기각몰카 기소유예. 피해자들은 심각한 고통을 호소하고 있다, 탐라에 지인 빙자 사기가 기승이라는 제보가 많았는데 오늘.

Chinese Gay Sex Twitter

지인능욕 딥페이크 영상을 편집, 반포한 자는 성폭력처벌법상 허위영상물등의 반포등으로 처벌됩니다.. 24일 기준, ‘지인능욕’ ‘지인박제’ ‘지인제보’ ‘지인사진’ 등 키워드로만 40여개의 트위터 계정이 검색됐다.. 9일 법조계에 따르면 수원고등법원은 a42씨의 특수강도미수 혐의 사건 항소심에서 원심판결을 파기하고 징역 1년 6월에 집행유예 3년, 사회봉사 120시간 read more..

이 사안에 대하여 오늘 구속영장실질심사가 있었고 구속영장이 기각되었습니다, 9일 법조계에 따르면 수원고등법원은 a42씨의 특수강도미수 혐의 사건 항소심에서 원심판결을 파기하고 징역 1년 6월에 집행유예 3년, 사회봉사 120시간 read more. ‘지인 합성‘, ‘지인제보 부탁‘, ‘지인 합성, 능욕’ 등 간판을 달고 합성 사진을 만드는 계정만 수백여개에 달했다. 14일 경기신문 취재를 종합하면 지인을 대상으로 한 성범죄는 x옛 트위터, 텔레.

chaepong2 텔레그램 불법 영상물 제작, 지인능욕방 운영자 검거 knn. Kr › posts › 97499텔레그램 지인제보 구속영장 기각몰카 기소유예 로톡. 인터넷으로도 할 수 있지만 이씨는 사이트 운영자뿐 아니라 제보자 피해자의 사진 등을 지인능욕 사이트 운영자에게 전달도 잡을 수 있는지. Make sure everything is spelled correctly, or try searching for a different hashtag. 지난해 11월 고등학생 a 양은 텔레그램 지인 능욕방에 자신의 사진과 개인정보가 올라왔다는 제보를 받았습니다. chaeira

cosforce 互動寫真展 김 씨가 현금을 달러로 환전했고 월북 의사를 내비쳤다는 지인의 제보를 받고 나서였습니다. ‘지인 합성‘, ‘지인제보 부탁‘, ‘지인 합성, 능욕’ 등 간판을 달고 합성 사진을 만드는 계정만 수백여개에 달했다. 지인제보방은 n번방과 사건의 경중이 다른데 왜 동일시하냐 그쪽은 지인제보방 사진을 어떻게 구했냐 대가로 받는 5000. 만15세 아들이 1월 트위터의 무료지인 합성 광고를 보고 11대화를 통해 텔레그램에서 지인 사진과 능욕글을 요구했습니다. 텔레그램 지인제보 구속영장 기각몰카 기소유예. cd 이연 디시

clarkandmartha onlyfans 지인능욕이란 주변 여성의 사진을 가공해 음란물로 만들거나, 성희롱 글과 함께 사진과 개인정보를 온라인에 게시하는 것을 말한다. 이 운영자는 지인 능욕방 참여자들로부터 지인의 개인정보를 받아 279개의 딥페이크 영상물을 만들어 유포한 혐의를 받고 있으며, 피해자는 246명에 달하는 것으로 파악됐습니다. Com › news › read텔레그램 지인능욕방 운영자 구속기소&mldr. 피해자들은 심각한 고통을 호소하고 있다. ‘지인 합성‘, ‘지인제보 부탁‘, ‘지인 합성, 능욕’ 등 간판을 달고 합성 사진을 만드는 계정만 수백여개에 달했다. com2syar

candfans 디시 Kr › posts › 97499텔레그램 지인제보 구속영장 기각몰카 기소유예 로톡. Kr › news › endpage지인 능욕방에 내 사진&mldr. 만15세 아들이 1월 트위터의 무료지인 합성 광고를 보고 11대화를 통해 텔레그램에서 지인 사진과 능욕글을 요구했습니다. 지인제보 6 feb 2020, 1604 prev 이름 x민경 나이 23살 길가다 붙잡고 강간해도 눈까뒤집고 느끼는 인천 강간용 걸레년입니다ㅎㅎ머리끄댕이 잡고 입보지 앞보지 뒷보지 가리지말고 마음껏 사용하고 질싸한뒤 버려두세요. 텔레그램에서 딥페이크로 지인능욕 가짜 이미지나 영상을 통해 지인을 성적 대상화하는 것 영상물을 제작유포한 운영한 20대 남성이 구속.

daronghada 이 사안에 대하여 오늘 구속영장실질심사가 있었고 구속영장이 기각되었습니다. 9일 법조계에 따르면 수원고등법원은 a42씨의 특수강도미수 혐의 사건 항소심에서 원심판결을 파기하고 징역 1년 6월에 집행유예 3년, 사회봉사 120시간 read more. 교복을 입은 미성년자를 대상으로 한 불법촬영 영상, 지인 제보라며 주변 지인의 일상 사진을 허위 정보와 함께 올린 게시물, 이들의 사진을. 따라서 피해자가 아닌 제3자의 경우에도 수사기관에 고발이나 진정하실 수 있습니다. 지인제보 6 feb 2020, 1604 prev 이름 x민경 나이 23살 길가다 붙잡고 강간해도 눈까뒤집고 느끼는 인천 강간용 걸레년입니다ㅎㅎ머리끄댕이 잡고 입보지 앞보지 뒷보지 가리지말고 마음껏 사용하고 질싸한뒤 버려두세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.