2,720 followers, 225 following, 119 posts 지예 @yeiark on instagram.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

지예jiyeh blind 신예 ccm 아티스트 지예가 blind라는 싱글 앨범을 발매하며 활동을 시작한다. 478k followers, 1,004 following, 5,418 posts 지예 🌿 @jye. 신체적인 특징으로는 키 171cm, 몸무게 49kg, 혈액형 a형, 발 사이즈 240mm가 있으며, 가족으로는 아버지1967년생, 어머니1971년생. 최근 가수 지예씨송지예에 따르면 이번 가을 출시될 지예의 정규 앨범 ‘gir.

Find Top Songs And Albums By 지예 Including 네가 있기에 Feat.

지예은 기안84가 설계한 민박집을 본 지예은과 방탄소년단bts 진이 경악했다.

오늘은 지예은의 나이, 학력, 인스타그램 계정 등 프로필 정보를 한눈에 정리해드립니다. On july 24, jiye was introduced as a member of i, Jiye 지예, also going by the name hera 헤라, is a south korean singer and rapper under i. 한편 지예은은 지난달 태도 논란에 휩싸인 바 있다. 지예은 프로필 나이 본명 지예은 생일 1994년 7월 26일 29세 국적 대한민국 신체사이즈 키 171cm 체중 49kg 발사이즈 240mm 혈액형 a형 지예은 인스타그램 바로가기 가족사항 아버지 어머니1971년생 동생 2명 학력사항 한국예술종합학교 연극원 연기과 예술사 데뷔 2017년 웹드라마 하우투 mbti isfp.

Com › kboard › 28620635지예아 국내 힙합 힙합엘이 hiphople. 100만 번의 지예아, @ksmartboi hiphopplaya 힙합플레이야 김상민그는감히전설이라고할수있다 김감전 ksmartboi mufasatalk no photo. 지난 6일 공개된 쿠팡플레이 직장인들2에는 영화 살인자 리포트의.

신체적인 특징으로는 키 171cm, 몸무게 49kg, 혈액형 A형, 발 사이즈 240mm가 있으며, 가족으로는 아버지1967년생, 어머니1971년생.

또 다른 직원 지예은은 기대하고 왔단 말예요.. Find top songs and albums by 지예 including 네가 있기에 feat.. E on instagram hawa 하와 @with..

Radis_hiphop 지예아 970. 나무위키가 가르쳐줄 거라고 생각했음에도 불구하고 나무위키에서도 내용이 나오지 않는 것들이 많았습니다. Eu 영어 하킴 지예시 léquipe 프랑스어 하킴 지예시, E on j 보여드릴 이어링, 어떤 종류 있는지 궁금해하실 것 같아서 한눈에 보기 쉽게 정리해봤어요 흐흐 피드백 빠르죠, Eu 영어 하킴 지예시 léquipe 프랑스어 하킴 지예시.

30대 남자 헤어스타일 지예은 프로필 나이 본명 지예은 생일 1994년 7월 26일 29세 국적 대한민국 신체사이즈 키 171cm 체중 49kg 발사이즈 240mm 혈액형 a형 지예은 인스타그램 바로가기 가족사항 아버지 어머니1971년생 동생 2명 학력사항 한국예술종합학교 연극원 연기과 예술사 데뷔 2017년 웹드라마 하우투 mbti isfp. 김상민그는감히전설이라고할수있다 지예아, 김감전 지예아, 김상민 지예아 and more. Sbs 런닝맨 멤버들이 지예은의 새 집을 찾아갔을 때, 지예은은 어두우니 조명을 켜달라는 촬영 감독의 요청에 죄송하다. 25k followers, 837 following, 495 posts 𝐙𝐞𝐞𝐲𝐞 지예 @zeeyeart on instagram 🇨🇦toronto @bringmeyourskin octnov booking open. 2017년 연기자로 데뷔한 이후, 꾸준한 활동과 노력으로 자신만의 독특한 매력을 구축해왔다. 1041437 fc2

4305700 エロ 배우 지예은은 연기와 예능을 넘나드는 다재다능한 엔터테이너로 자리매김하고 있다. 2,653 followers, 820 following, 135 posts 지예 @jiyeee____ on instagram. 이번 글에서는 snl을 통해 유명해지기 시작하고, 마라탕웨이 등 여러가지 유행어를 만든 지예은에 대해 알아볼 것이다. ㅂㅅ들 잘한다 싶더니 종특나오네 카이오 자계 엔딩에 큰 불만은 세 가지임 지오바니 세라핌. E on instagram hawa 하와 @with. 19금 프롬포트

1818야동 Tv리포트이동건 기자 배우 지예은이 sbs 런닝맨 태도 논란 언급에 당황했다. Designs @zeeyeartwork. 오늘은 지예은의 나이, 학력, 인스타그램 계정 등 프로필 정보를 한눈에 정리해드립니다. Com › tag › 지예아지예아 tiktok. 73k followers, 322 following, 109 posts 지예 @sia. 2516195 히토미

10분 버티면 일본 지예은ji yeeun은 1994년 7월 26일 서울특별시 종로구 연건동 서울대학교병원에서 태어났습니다. 나는다채로운랩핑과라이밍혹은랩스킬로혼을쏙빼놓는대한민국최고의rap뱉는자손심바하지만데일리다섯명의감상자 like reply. 최근 가수 지예씨송지예에 따르면 이번 가을 출시될 지예의 정규 앨범 ‘gir. 100만 번의 지예아, @ksmartboi hiphopplaya 힙합플레이야 김상민그는감히전설이라고할수있다 김감전 ksmartboi mufasatalk no photo. 배우 지예은은 연기와 예능을 넘나드는 다재다능한 엔터테이너로 자리매김하고 있다.

3068336 Jiye 지예, also going by the name hera 헤라, is a south korean singer and rapper under i. 25k followers, 837 following, 495 posts 𝐙𝐞𝐞𝐲𝐞 지예 @zeeyeart on instagram 🇨🇦toronto @bringmeyourskin octnov booking open. 신체적인 특징으로는 키 171cm, 몸무게 49kg, 혈액형 a형, 발 사이즈 240mm가 있으며, 가족으로는 아버지1967년생, 어머니1971년생. 지예아, @ksmartboi, @yanghongwon hiphopplaya 힙합플레이야 김상민그는감히전설이라고할수있다 김상민 김감전 양홍원 쇼미더머니 more. 의외로 보수적인 성향을 가지고 있다고 하는 배우.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.