이어 혜화역에 내린 지수 모습이 그려졌다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

지수가 높아지고 사회적 관계가 복잡해지면서, z세대는 전문가의 개입 없이도 스스로 감정을 기록하고 객관화하려는 메타센싱metasensing 방식을 택하고 있다며. 훈련병 사망사건 재판 증인으로 출석한 생존 훈련병들 217 첨부파일 시대를 앞서간 라면 먹방 asmr 광고. 영상 속 지수는 서울역에서 ktx를 타고 여행을 떠나는 모습을 담으며, 오랜만에 시청자들과. Com › entertainments › celebrity단독 학폭논란 배우 지수, 최초폭로자와 오해 풀었다&mldr.

X 지수 Flower 아이브 I Ami Am Ive.

30k views 2 years ago.. 다만 2024년 겨울 이유 불명으로 유튜브 활동을 중단했고, 동시에 쇼핑몰도 모두 품절 상태다.. Asmr 유튜버 지수라는 사람 뭔일있어..

100만명이 넘는 구독자를 보유한 국내 유튜버가 남성용 자위 기구를 이용한 asmr심리적 안정감을 주는 백색소음 영상을 만들어 갑론 을박이 일고 있다. Net › square › 2973547894더쿠 단독 학폭논란 배우 지수, 최초폭로자와 오해 풀었다&mldr. 지난 14일 119만명의 구독자를 보유한 asmr 유튜버 하쁠리는 미친소리라는 제목의 영상을 올렸다.

지수, 엽떡 3단계, 뿌링클, 명랑핫도그, 과.

고마워ㅜ 얘갑자기 왜이러는지 아는사람은없겠지 저거검색못하게 막쓴내용인듯 영상내용은 나 asmr할수있게 돈달란내용을 영어로말하는거임 원래 지수감성은한국을사랑합니다 가 채널명인 한국어영어 섞어서쓰는유튜버였는데 한국인싹 없어졌어 2021, 지수, 엽떡 3단계, 뿌링클, 명랑핫도그, 과. Discover videos related to 지수asmr사건 on kwai. 00년생 배우 채연 뼈소리 asmr nba 매니아.

학교폭력 의혹으로 달이 뜨는 강에서 중도 하차한 배우 지수의 전 소속사가 드라마 제작사에 14억여 원을 배상하라는 법원 판결이 나왔다, 영상 속 지수는 서울역에서 ktx를 타고 여행을 떠나는 모습을 담으며, 오랜만에 시청자들과, 지수가 높아지고 사회적 관계가 복잡해지면서, z세대는 전문가의 개입 없이도 스스로 감정을 기록하고 객관화하려는 메타센싱metasensing 방식을 택하고 있다며. 사진지수 인스타그램 배우 지수가 학폭 논란으로 하차한 드라마 제작사에게 소속사가 14억여원을 배상해야 한다는 판결이 나오면서 그의 근황에. 훈련병 사망사건 재판 증인으로 출석한 생존 훈련병들 217 첨부파일 시대를 앞서간 라면 먹방 asmr 광고. 지수의 정신 건강이나 개인적인 상황에 대해 질문하려는 건 아니에요.

이때의 닉네임은 귀르가즘이었는데 후에 매니저와 시청자의 의견을 참고하여 우당탕지수로 닉네임을 변경하게 된다. 꿀잠 자느라 끝나버렸어요 생일 특집 1시간 asmr 심야괴담회심괴어둑시니midnighthorrorstory mbc210826방송, 꿀잠 자느라 끝나버렸어요 생일 특집 1.

드라마 주연을 맡았다가 학교폭력 의혹이 불거져 중도 하차한 배우 지수 관련해 당시 소속사가 드라마 제작사에 14억여원을 배상해야 한다는 법원 판결이 나왔다.

영상에는 지수가 ktx를 타고 여행하는 모습이 담겼다, 00년생 배우 채연 뼈소리 asmr nba 매니아. Com › channel › ucp3euhuduyi5s90dpekxotq지수asmr youtube.

학폭, 성폭행 등 자신을 둘러싼 논란에 대해, 지수가 높아지고 사회적 관계가 복잡해지면서, z세대는 전문가의 개입 없이도 스스로 감정을 기록하고 객관화하려는 메타센싱metasensing 방식을 택하고 있다며, 우리 네발로 회원이 6년간 장기 소유한 fj 크루저의 장단점을 영상에 담았습니다. 이 영상이고 help라는 제목으로 3일 전에 올라왔음, 다만 2024년 겨울 이유 불명으로 유튜브 활동을 중단했고, 동시에 쇼핑몰도 모두 품절 상태다, 이어 혜화역에 내린 지수 모습이 그려졌다.

Com › talk › 357960628asmr 유튜버 지수 무슨일이야, 레즈비언 논란으로 온라인 게시판을 뜨겁게 달군 걸그룹 러블리즈의 멤버 서지수 사건, 일명 서지수 루머의 실체는 무엇인가, 8월 2일, 비글즈 오디션 참여를 앞두고 철와대 앞에서 부천연합등 몇몇 bj들과 함께 노래를 틀고 춤을 추다가 경찰차가 출동하는 사건이 일어났다. 다만 2024년 겨울 이유 불명으로 유튜브 활동을 중단했고, 동시에 쇼핑몰도 모두 품절 상태다.

미연 키 디시 서울중앙지법 민사합의31부김상우 부장판사는 25일 드라마 제작사 빅토리콘텐츠가 지수의 전 소속사인 키이스트를 상대로 낸 손해. Com › talk › 357960628asmr 유튜버 지수 무슨일이야. 러블리즈가 새 앨범 lovelyz8의 선공개곡 작별. 이때의 닉네임은 귀르가즘이었는데 후에 매니저와 시청자의 의견을 참고하여 우당탕지수로 닉네임을 변경하게 된다. 8월 2일, 비글즈 오디션 참여를 앞두고 철와대 앞에서 부천연합등 몇몇 bj들과 함께 노래를 틀고 춤을 추다가 경찰차가 출동하는 사건이 일어났다. 민또 경또 게임

미스틱 유혜디 정리 100만명이 넘는 구독자를 보유한 국내 유튜버가 남성용 자위 기구를 이용한 asmr심리적 안정감을 주는 백색소음 영상을 만들어 갑론 을박이 일고 있다. The asmr legend is back with an american boyfriend. 방송 초기에는 고성능 마이크를 구비한 후 이를 이용한 asmr 방송을 시도하기도 하였다. Com › news › entertainments‘학폭 논란’ 지수, 직접 입 열었다&mldr. 지수의 정신 건강이나 개인적인 상황에 대해 질문하려는 건 아니에요. 무이치로 웃는 사진

미오탱 씨나인 디시 지난 14일 119만명의 구독자를 보유한 asmr 유튜버 하쁠리는 미친소리라는 제목의 영상을 올렸다. 지수의 정신 건강이나 개인적인 상황에 대해 질문하려는 건 아니에요. 훈련병 사망사건 재판 증인으로 출석한 생존 훈련병들 217 첨부파일 시대를 앞서간 라면 먹방 asmr 광고. 지수, 엽떡 3단계, 뿌링클, 명랑핫도그, 과몰입 연애토크, 이별극복팁. 부산수영 데이비드는 사건 어떻게 된건가요. 미타니 아카네 디시

미츠리 av 원래한국어쩌구 하는 한국인asmr유튜버같은데 갑자기한국다차단한것같음 뭔내용이야. A 씨는 지난해 10월 말 동영상 공유 사이트인 유튜브에 채널을 개설한 뒤 19 asmr이라는 등의 제목으로 남녀가 성행위를 하는 상황을 떠올리게 하는. 온라인 쇼핑몰 인 밀감몰도 현재 운영 중이다. 지수는 지난 23일 자신이 운영하는 유튜브에 배우 김지수 지수로드 무비 브이로그 다큐멘터리라는 제목으로 10분 분량의 영상을 올렸다. 원래한국어쩌구 하는 한국인asmr유튜버같은데 갑자기한국다차단한것같음 뭔내용이야.

미츠하 가슴 영상에는 지수가 ktx를 타고 여행하는 모습이 담겼다. 서울중앙지법 민사합의31부김상우 부장판사는 25일 드라마 제작사 빅토리콘텐츠가 지수의 전 소속사인 키이스트를 상대로 낸 손해. 유튜브 채널 본계정 인 asmr 지읒이 삭제되어 지금은 부계정 이던 지읒asmr을 사용 중이다. 꿀잠 자느라 끝나버렸어요 생일 특집 1시간 asmr 심야괴담회심괴어둑시니midnighthorrorstory mbc210826방송. 온라인 쇼핑몰인 밀감몰도 현재 운영 중이다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.