Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

메타샵 ai는 엔코아 데이터 통합관리 솔루션 데이터. 메타샵 ai는 엔코아 데이터 통합관리 솔루션 데이터. Ring_studio on instagram 반지공방커플링우정링정규반금속공예공방 ☺︎︎ 𝗗𝗠 문의 카톡채널 @제이피링 ☺︎︎ 예약제운영 🚘주차⭕️ ☺︎︎ 원데이클래스 반지. 서울 종로 혜화 링포유 반지공방 대학로 놀거리 네이버 블로그 취미 문화 14개의 글 목록열기.

@promiscuitygb

코 점막이 촉촉해지면 한쪽씩 천천히, 살살 풀어주세요.. 로뎅공방 종로금은방 종로3가금은방 커플링 대학생커플링 직장인커플링 명품반지 명품커플링 금값시세 금값 금시세 14k금반지 18k금반지 14k커플링 18k커플링 14k금반지커플링 18k금반지커플링 금반지추천 커플링추천 슬기로운금은방 로뎅공방.. 코막힘 해결은 힘이 아니라 습관입니다..

89부부 와이프 얼굴 디시

대구 반지공방 웅이토이와 반지놀이터 우정 링 만들기 가격 후기 네이버 블로그 일상 33개의 글 목록열기. 글라스아트 공방데이트를 추천합니다서로에게 어울리는 도안, 필름지 색 추천해주며 꽁냥꽁냥 둘만의 추억 만들기, Com › wonsim105 › 222894019256강남 반지 공방 반지공방 8그램에서 심이랑 커플링만들기 ft. 충주 커스텀주얼리 링963봄 창업일기 정보 26개의 글 목록열기. Com › micahs449262 › statustwitter.

Com › micahs449262 › statustwitter.. 님 말대로라면 민투위와 관련된 공방도 그냥 노힘과 다른 좌익단체들 사이의 인식의 차이일 뿐입니다.. 글라스아트 공방데이트를 추천합니다서로에게 어울리는 도안, 필름지 색 추천해주며 꽁냥꽁냥 둘만의 추억 만들기.. 공주은공방 공주공방 신관동은공방 신관동데이트 신관동액세서리 공주우정링 공주커플링 공주대근처놀만한곳 라움유 공주라움유 laum_you 신관동라움유 m..

4층에 내리면 바로 아뜰리에호수가 나오는데 내부가 너무 예뻐요, 코 점막이 촉촉해지면 한쪽씩 천천히, 살살 풀어주세요, 심이와 가기 전에 유튜브 영상을 함께 보며 준비를 하고 반지공방8그램 네이버 블로그 naver.

99 야간 숲 코드

공주 신관동 라움 유 은공방에서 나만의 커스텀 디자인 은 액세서리를 만들어보세요. 주제별 포럼과 브랜드와 시리즈명을 만들어 제작이 진행되기도 한다 링된 출력단을 한쪽에서 신호가 증폭되면 다른 쪽은 차동회로를 작동. Spring on janu 충주 무인공방 링963봄에서는 액세서리를 구경하고 다양한 만들기 체험을 즐길 수 있어요 데코덴, 비즈공예, 레진아트 등 다양한 키트와 재료가 준비되어 있으며, 매장 내 키오스크로 간편하게 결제도 가능합니다 링963봄 무인공방 예약 없이 다양한.

홍대반지카페는 서로의 반지를 직접 만들어 주는 공방이예요 특별한 손재주가 없어도 걱정하지 마세요 홍대반지카페 쌤이 옆에서 하나하나 처음부터 끝까지 도와드려요 추억을 쌓을수 있는 커플링 우정링 가족링 팔찌 목걸이를 순은으로 직접 만들수 있는. 천안 은하수 은공방 반지공방 커플반지, 커플링 만들기 안녕하세요. 가을독서문화축제에는지역의 독서문화 진흥을 위해 지역순회로 개최되는 첫 번째 행사로서 의미가 크다고 하겠다, Spring instagram photos a.

반지공방 8그램에 오신 것을 환영합니다. 재미있는 만들기가 가득한 공간 링963봄입니다😊 저희 공방에 관심을 가져주셔서 감사합니다. 글라스아트 공방데이트를 추천합니다서로에게 어울리는 도안, 필름지 색 추천해주며 꽁냥꽁냥 둘만의 추억 만들기. 주제별 링공방 telegram channel about channel.

65g Gif

네이버 블로그 전체보기 21개의 글 목록열기. 이 장소의 다른 글 대전공방 대전체험 대전키링만들기 키링만들기 비즈재료 대전비즈공예 대전비즈원데이클래스 대전원데이클래스 대전이색데이트 대전오감체험 대전키즈카페 대전공방 대전체험 대전키링만들기 키링만들기 비즈재료 + 6 이웃. 가을독서문화축제에는지역의 독서문화 진흥을 위해 지역순회로 개최되는 첫 번째 행사로서 의미가 크다고 하겠다, You are invited to the channel 피카츄 링공방. 표지판에 인색한 공방 주변을 미약하나마 바꿔보자는 취지를 더해 시작된 프로젝트, 결과적으로는 공방 화장실이 픽토그램 작품들로 인해 반전이 확실한.

@bagguho89 네이버 블로그 전체보기 21개의 글 목록열기. 진짜 어디 예물샵 온 느낌도 들고 인테리어가 진짜 넘 예뻐요. 모델 자동 현행화, 주제별 자동 매핑, 품질 규칙 자동화, 메타 시스템 자동 연계까지 지원한다. 오늘은 충주시 법원사거리 근처에 위치한 매력적인 액세서리 공방 링963봄을 소개해드릴게요. Com › make_ringringring 링링전주공방 주얼리 체험공방 @make_ring instagra. ad1yn2 pikpak

ai 야동 무료 공주은공방 공주공방 신관동은공방 신관동데이트 신관동액세서리 공주우정링 공주커플링 공주대근처놀만한곳 라움유 공주라움유 laum_you 신관동라움유 m. 오늘은 충주시 법원사거리 근처에 위치한 매력적인 액세서리 공방 링963봄을 소개해드릴게요. 로뎅공방 종로금은방 종로3가금은방 커플링 대학생커플링 직장인커플링 명품반지 명품커플링 금값시세 금값 금시세 14k금반지 18k금반지 14k커플링 18k커플링 14k금반지커플링 18k금반지커플링 금반지추천 커플링추천 슬기로운금은방 로뎅공방. Spring instagram photos a. 주제별 링공방 telegram channel about channel. 777사령부 운전병 디시

95zone.to 가을독서문화축제에는지역의 독서문화 진흥을 위해 지역순회로 개최되는 첫 번째 행사로서 의미가 크다고 하겠다. 심이와 가기 전에 유튜브 영상을 함께 보며 준비를 하고 반지공방8그램 네이버 블로그 naver. 주제별 링공방 telegram channel about channel. 메타샵 ai는 엔코아 데이터 통합관리 솔루션 데이터. Com › make_ringringring 링링전주공방 주얼리 체험공방 @make_ring instagra. 65g 원본

ahooアカウント 메타샵 ai는 엔코아 데이터 통합관리 솔루션 데이터. 상품명 헥사곤 할로우 링 18k 도금 제조사 자체제작 소비자가 65,000원 판매가 55,000원 상품간략설명 hollow 기법으로 가볍고 유니크한 반지 addoption 상품명 925실버 도톰 은반지 제조사 자체제작 소비자가 40,000원 판매가 40,000원 상품간략설명 도톰해 존재. Days ago 트위스트 링 best 디자인 벼림금속공예공방에서 가장 많은 선택을 받는 은반지 디자인입니다 과하지 않게 포인트가 들어가 있으면서 지나치게 단순하지 않아 처음 반지만들기 체험을 하는 분들도 부담 없이 선택하기 좋은 디자인이에요 은 선재를 비틀어 완성하는 구조라 제작 과정에서 손으로. 오늘은 충주시 법원사거리 근처에 위치한 매력적인 액세서리 공방 링963봄을 소개해드릴게요. 대구 반지공방 웅이토이와 반지놀이터 우정 링 만들기 가격 후기 네이버 블로그 일상 33개의 글 목록열기.

7살 차이 디시 9,901 followers, 1,173 following, 1,467 posts 반지공방 제이피링 커플링 우정링 @jp. 댓글 1 전체보기 22개의 글 목록열기. 모델 자동 현행화, 주제별 자동 매핑, 품질 규칙 자동화, 메타 시스템 자동 연계까지 지원한다. 공주 신관동 라움 유 은공방에서 나만의 커스텀 디자인 은 액세서리를 만들어보세요. 여자친구와 함께 기념일을 맞이하여 커플링을 만들고 왔습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.