서울뉴스핌 최문선 기자 이번주는 조각도시, 당신이 죽였다, 친애하는 x 등이 공개된다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

장르 범죄, 스릴러 조각도시 몇부작 총 12부작 의 김창주,의 박신우 공동연출 원작 영화의 각본가이자 모범택시 시리즈를 집필한 오상호 극본 원작 영화. 배우 지창욱이 ‘조각도시’를 통해 장르물 장인으로서의 존재감을 드러낼 예정이다. 배우 지창욱이 ‘조각도시’를 통해 장르물 장인으로서의 존재감을 드러낼 예정이다. Hôtel de la marine 근처에서 무료로 즐길 거리를 찾고 계신가요.

1080p 조각도시 E01e12 통합7 19금 지창욱 도경수 완결 컨텐츠 번호 187465883 드라마미니시리즈.

호기롭게 애드립으로 대사를 쳤지만 보이스 오버로 얼굴.. 평범한 삶이 조작된 나락으로 떨어진 남자의 핏빛 복수극으로, 지창욱과 도경수의 강렬한 대립이 화제예요.. 조각도시 ost various artists genie.. 조각도시는 평범한 삶을 살던 태중이 어느 날 억울하게 흉악한 범죄에 휘말려서 감옥에 가게 되고, 모든 것은 요한도경수 분에 의해 계획되었다는 것을 알게..

조각도시 Ost Various Artists Genie.

이번 ‘조각도시’를 통해 ‘폭군’의 이미지를 벗고 새로운 얼굴로 180도 변신한 조윤수는 괴물 신예다운 압도적인 존재감을 다시 한번 증명하며 앞으로 보여줄 성장에 대한 기대감을 높이고 있다.

이 때 남다른 어깨너비와 188cm나 되는 키로 이슈화되었다.. 배우 지창욱이 ‘조각도시’를 통해 장르물 장인으로서의 존재감을 드러낼 예정이다..

영화 조작된 도시2017에서 출발한 세계관을 드라마로 확장한 이번 작품은, 평범한 삶이 조작된 나락으로 떨어진 남자의 핏빛 복수극으로, 지창욱과 도경수의 강렬한 대립이 화제예요. 이를 해결하려면 별의 방을 나갔다 와야 한다.

조각도시 출연진 기본정보 줄거리 시청포인트 총정리 안내, 오늘은 2025년 11월 5일 디즈니+에서 공개되는 오리지널 시리즈 조각도시를 깊이 파헤쳐 보겠습니다.

이 인기를 이어 2013년 8월 15일부터 2014년 2월 13일까지 많은 신인 배우들이 거쳐가는 mtv 《엠 카운트다운》의 mc를 맡았다. 드라마 ‘조각도시’는 영화 를 새롭게 재해석한 액션 스릴러로, 도경수와 지창욱의 파격 변신이 돋보이는 작품입니다. 서울뉴스핌 최문선 기자 이번주는 조각도시, 당신이 죽였다, 친애하는 x 등이 공개된다.

도경수이광수의 극단적인 만남, 콩콩팡팡→조각도시, 서울뉴스핌 최문선 기자 이번주는 조각도시, 당신이 죽였다, 친애하는 x 등이 공개된다, 지창욱, 장르물 장인의 귀환조각도시 인생캐 예고.

히토미 고양이 이 때 남다른 어깨너비와 188cm나 되는 키로 이슈화되었다. 도경수이광수의 극단적인 만남, 콩콩팡팡→조각도시. 호기롭게 애드립으로 대사를 쳤지만 보이스 오버로 얼굴. 짧지만 얼굴형을 정돈해주고 남성적인 분위기를 살려주는 스타일로 요즘 2030대 남성분들 사이에서 다시 주목받고 있습니다 조각도시 도경수 머리 아이비리그컷을 기준으로 누구에게 어울리는지 어떻게 시술되는지 자세히 알려드릴게요. 누명을 쓴 사람과 누명을 씌운 사람 사이에서 벌어지는 처절한 복수극을 그린 디즈니+ 오리지널 시리즈 조각도시극본 오상호연출 박신우에서 만난. 히토미 다운로더 숲

환승연애4 인스 타 디시 두 작품 모두 디즈니+ 오리지널 시리즈로 글로벌 흥행을 기록하며, 지창욱이 이끌어가는 장르의 완성도를 입증했다. 조각도시 4화 외워갔던 대사가 무색하게 씬 자체가 없어지고 현장에서 새로 만들어졌던 장면. 이를 해결하려면 별의 방을 나갔다 와야 한다. 지창욱 조각도시 지창욱, 장르물 장인의 귀환액션 복수극. Log in open 이날 올려준 영상 찍은 날인가보당 영상이랑 노래 너무 이뻐서 노래 바로 다운. 히토미 slave

후타나리 스위치 호기롭게 애드립으로 대사를 쳤지만 보이스 오버로 얼굴. 호기롭게 애드립으로 대사를 쳤지만 보이스 오버로 얼굴. 오는 11월 5일 디즈니+의 오리지널 시리즈 ‘조각도시’ 각본 오상호감독 박신우, 김창주 공개에 앞서 ‘장르물 명가’로 익히 알려진 디즈니+와 지창욱의 만남이 시너지를 극대화하며 ‘장르물 맛집’다운 짜릿한 카타르시스를 선사할 예정이다. 총 12부작으로 구성되어 있으며, 디즈니플러스에서만 단독 공개됩니다. 지창욱사진월트디즈니 컴퍼니 코리아오는 11월 5일 첫. 후타나리 뜻

히토미 관장 디즈니플러스의 새 드라마 2025년 하반기에 공개 예정입니다. 이번 ‘조각도시’를 통해 ‘폭군’의 이미지를 벗고 새로운 얼굴로 180도 변신한 조윤수는 괴물 신예다운 압도적인 존재감을 다시 한번 증명하며 앞으로 보여줄 성장에 대한 기대감을 높이고 있다. 우연히 휴대폰을 찾아 달라는 낯선 여자의 전화 이후 그녀를 살해한 범인으로 몰리게 된다. 도경수이광수의 극단적인 만남, 콩콩팡팡→조각도시. 우연히 휴대폰을 찾아 달라는 낯선 여자의 전화 이후 그녀를 살해한 범인으로 몰리게 된다.

히메노 히토미 게임 세계 속에서는 완벽한 리더지만 현실에서는 백수인 권유. 조각도시는 평범한 삶을 살던 태중지창욱이 어느. 이 인기를 이어 2013년 8월 15일부터 2014년 2월 13일까지 많은 신인 배우들이 거쳐가는 mtv 《엠 카운트다운》의 mc를 맡았다. 총 12부작으로 구성되어 있으며, 디즈니플러스에서만 단독 공개됩니다. 장르 범죄, 스릴러 조각도시 몇부작 총 12부작 의 김창주,의 박신우 공동연출 원작 영화의 각본가이자 모범택시 시리즈를 집필한 오상호 극본 원작 영화.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.