Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

하는 생각이 드네요ㅎㅎ 왜 이걸 이제서야 했을까 오히려 후회가 들정도ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 새로운 시술실에서 제모를 받았는데, 들어보니 젠맥프로 기계를 플러스로 교체해서 이제 두대로 운영중이래요. 제 수염이 이정도인데, 면도해도 피부가 밝아서그런지 회색빛이 너무 심해서 사람들이 면도한거 맞냐묻네요ㅠ 젠틀맥스5회 이용 시 회색빛 거의 사라지. 아포지 각기다른병원 3군데 6회 5회 11회 22회 보다 젠틀맥스프로플러스 1회가 좋았습니다 저는 누가돈더많은지 별병신같은버러지새끼가 디시.

아포지 각기다른병원 3군데 6회 5회 11회 22회 보다 젠틀맥스프로플러스 1회가 좋았습니다 저는 2.. 하는 생각이 드네요ㅎㅎ 왜 이걸 이제서야 했을까 오히려 후회가 들정도ㅋㅋㅋㅋ..

Thisvid 사이트

Thebrittanyxoxo Sotwe

29 213614 삭제 제갤러7219. 대충 먼저 말하자면 턱+인중으로 10회 했고젠맥이 효과 좋다길래 장비 있는 곳으로 알아보고 감레이저가 왁싱보다 아프다는 후기 보고 쫄았는데 참을만 했음가격도 뭐 나쁘지 않게 한 듯ㅇㅇ제모 받기 전임10번 끝나고, 지금 안면부 상태는 5회차만 결제할걸그랬나. 용산밴스 프로 넘게 털렸다 털도 콧털마냥 겁나 부드러워서 상관없을 거같다 첨. 젠틀맥스프로플러스 5회 끊고 받고있는데ㅈㄴ좋은듯 제모.

1회차 처음은 무조건 아픔 아픈거 잘 참아도 따끔따끔함아픈만큼 얼굴에 듬성듬성 빨간자국이 남음 모낭염 올라오는듯하루종일 목이랑 얼굴이랑 따끔따끔거리고붉은끼 이건 바로 안없어지고 한 1주일지나야 없어짐그리고 인중이나. 젠틀맥스 프로 플러스 이거 가격 적당한 거임. 이웃추가 친구의 말을 듣고 시작한 수염 제모. 진짜 수염때문에 매일 아침 스트레스 받는 1인인데아침에 면도해도 점심이면 거뭇하고 저녁약속 나가면 하나같이 다 면도 안했냐고 물어볼 정도목까지 수염이 나서 면도하기도 힘들고검색 좀 해보니까 젠틀맥스프로, 아포지 엘리트 플러스 장비쓰는곳이 좋다고 하는데수원, 서울강남, 동탄.

첫 시술이라 원장님 진료 요청하고 대표원장님 남자 시술 받음. 1회차 처음은 무조건 아픔 아픈거 잘 참아도 따끔따끔함아픈만큼 얼굴에 듬성듬성 빨간자국이 남음 모낭염 올라오는듯하루종일 목이랑 얼굴이랑 따끔따끔거리고붉은끼 이건 바로 안없어지고 한 1주일지나야 없어짐그리고 인중이나. 유라이크 사아이어쿨링 x2 ui20sbk 56. 처음부터 수염이 자랐고 그렇게 살아와서 별생각 없이 지냈지만 10회의 젠틀맥스프로 제모를 받고 나니 수염이 나지 않는 분들이 참 부럽다는 생각을 하게 되었다.

Tokyomotion スポーツ

제가 털보가 아니었던건지, 레이저랑 잘맞는건진 몰라도 아마 2주후부터는 3일에 한번만 면도를해도 되지않을까. 제가 다니는 용인수지피부과는 젠틀맥스프로플러스랑 아포지 기계가 모두 있어서 피부 상태나 모량에 맞게 선택이 가능하더라고요 저는 이전에도 젠틀맥스프로플러스로 받아서 이번에도 동일하게 젠틀맥스프로플러스로 시술 받고. 수염 제모에 가장 효과 좋다는 젠틀맥스프로플러스. 진짜 수염때문에 매일 아침 스트레스 받는 1인인데아침에 면도해도 점심이면 거뭇하고 저녁약속 나가면 하나같이 다 면도 안했냐고 물어볼 정도목까지 수염이 나서 면도하기도 힘들고검색 좀 해보니까 젠틀맥스프로, 아포지 엘리트 플러스 장비쓰는곳이 좋다고 하는데수원, 서울강남, 동탄.

유라이크 사아이어쿨링 x2 ui20sbk 56, 젠지맥스프로로 5회 받으면 1년은 가나요. 5초 간격, 최대출력모드로 자동 연속조사 가능, 조사창 3, 고급입맛누렁이 그래도 5퍼면 면도 20초 정도면 되겠네 내가 아침에 면도하면 저녁에 원상복구되는 정도라 너무 해방되고 싶어서 이제 2회차 6일 지났는데 15번 까지면 갈길이 멀구나 그 5퍼는 사실상 해결 안되는 부위라고 보면 되나.

starts 224 그럼 5회, 평범하면 10회, 그리고 아무리 털보여도 15회 정도면 쇼부 봐야한다. 수염 제모에 가장 효과 좋다는 젠틀맥스프로플러스. 종아리 레이저제모를 다시 하면서 가장 중요하게 본 게 기계. 0 고정닉 이미지 젠틀맥스프로 2주마다 하는거맞아요. 가연 이상형 프로필 받기 공식 apple 브랜드관에서 쿠팡 특가로 지금 만나보세요 5 19. tokyo hot 이선화

teiduga 하는 생각이 드네요ㅎㅎ 왜 이걸 이제서야 했을까 오히려 후회가 들정도ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 11 1021 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 젠틀맥스프로플러스 5회 끊고 받고있는데ㅈㄴ좋은듯 제모. 다시 올라올걸 나도 중간에 와 다 빠졌다 생각했지만 5회차 지나고 다시 나는거 보게됐고 여기 가끔 15회 20회 받았다는 사람들도 계속 난다고 그러고. 수염 제모에 가장 효과 좋다는 젠틀맥스프로플러스. tumbex bbw

thisvid 회원가입 29 061110 삭제 제갤러6220. 젠틀맥스 프로 플러스 이거 가격 적당한 거임. 그냥 가기 귀찮아서 그런거야제모는 첨 받아보고, 모량이 많다기 보다는억세고 빠르게 자라얼굴전체이고 진정은 미포함임. 종아리 레이저제모를 다시 하면서 가장 중요하게 본 게 기계. 아포지 각기다른병원 3군데 6회 5회 11회 22회 보다 젠틀맥스프로플러스 1회가 좋았습니다 저는 2. tumbex ㅈㄷ

tumbex spanking Com › jejurea › 223880923695마곡레이저제모 젠틀맥스프로플러스 5회차 후기 강서구피부과 네. 대전 ㄷㅅ동 ㅅㄴㅇ의원에서 받음후기 ㄱㅊ아서 10회권 결제함여자 직원이 시술해줌10분 마취아프다고하는 애들 많아서 쫄았는데 인중빼고 별로 않아팠음12일차면도기가 안먹힘34일차제모 받기 전보다 늦게 자라는 느낌수염. 젠틀맥스프로 5회 77만언 ㅡㅡ 제모 마이너 갤러리. 대전 ㄷㅅ동 ㅅㄴㅇ의원에서 받음후기 ㄱㅊ아서 10회권 결제함여자 직원이 시술해줌10분 마취아프다고하는 애들 많아서 쫄았는데 인중빼고 별로 않아팠음12일차면도기가 안먹힘34일차제모 받기 전보다 늦게 자라는 느낌수염. 11 1021 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보.

tumbex 업스 새로운 시술실에서 제모를 받았는데, 들어보니 젠맥프로 기계를 플러스로 교체해서 이제 두대로 운영중이래요. 전직 적당한 털쟁이일때 아무것도 모르고 집앞에서 아포지. 서울경기 젠틀맥스 프로 이상 가격비교 24. 남자 수염레이저 제모 젠틀맥스프로플러스 5회 솔직 후기. 다시 올라올걸 나도 중간에 와 다 빠졌다 생각했지만 5회차 지나고 다시 나는거 보게됐고 여기 가끔 15회 20회 받았다는 사람들도 계속 난다고 그러고.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.