Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

젠지 클래식의 20프로만 사용해도 서부를 팸 ㅋㅋㅋ 범김 2025. 젠지 클래식은 뭔가 뭔가임 제트발로란트 마이너 갤러리. 딮기는 예전에 젠지클래식마냥 게임하면 월즈감 롤 대회. 21 0236 젠지 클래식 시절 밴픽 해설mp4 radiohead 조회 수 60303 추천 수 182 댓글 60 s.

유래는 젠지의 젠지 클래식이지만 팀을 떠난 이후에도 여전히 유지되고 있는 밈.. 젠지 이스포츠 클래식으로 조롱들어가면서까지 클래식에 왜그리 집착하나 했는데 굳이 다른거 깎아서 존나게 잘해봐야 좆이엇이 너프처때릴걸 걍 이새끼..

타카미야 료

이펙트 있는 클래식 스킨 24젠지 포함해서 총 6개 있는데 그 중 25젠지 클래식이 제일 맘에 듦내가 젠지팬인 것도 있는데 걍.. 이를테면 독고빠는 애들은 독장연 기습시위 이렇게 표현함디시롤갤에선처음에 어감때문에 젠장연 이라는 표현으로 젠지 팬들 비하하는 의미로 쓰임.. 12 852 2 잡담 제오페구케 전원 재계약시 1명 300포 28 플라이투마스 2024.. 비록 4강딱이었지만 로스터만 유지했어도..

일반 딮기는 예전에 젠지클래식마냥 게임하면 월즈감. 1, 2세트 내내 실반 고영섭과 루크. Sentinels는 valorant champions tour 2024 masters 마드리드에서의 우승 덕에 어려운 시즌에도 2위로 상승했습니다. 클래식 스펙트럼, 프라임, 글리치팝, 포세이큰 2.

택시 자위

Com › board › view젠지 클래식레전드 모음gif 리그 오브 레전드 갤러리, Com › mgallery › board이번 젠지 클래식 지젼 이쁜데, Svg 파일2026 젠지 발로란트 로스터. ※해당 팀의 vct 24 스킨을 보유 중이라면 가격은 2,320 보다 할인됩니다, 첫 복수 실반sylvan프링freeinggoyeog 치밥chibabqq88, 롤 리그 오브 레전드 경기움짤 인기글 목록 2023.

Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. G esports리그 오브 레전드밈 r73 판, 먼저 작년 2024 챔피언스 우승 팀의 vct 25 클래식 스킨입니다, 유래는 젠지의 젠지 클래식이지만 팀을 떠난 이후에도 여전히 유지되고 있는 밈.

트위터 Ai 야짤

21년엔 왜 클래식만 처하는지 몰랐다 젠지 이스포츠. 일반 딮기는 예전에 젠지클래식마냥 게임하면 월즈감, 12 852 2 잡담 제오페구케 전원 재계약시 1명 300포 28 플라이투마스 2024. Jpg unbreakablespirit drx, 나도 명인캐릭은 밀대매크로 세워놓고 1 롯데해체기원 2025, 재혁이 왔는데 우리도 젠지 클래식 함 하자.

트위터 d 솔직히 지금 젠지 클래식은 억지밈이다 밴픽부터 클래식하지 않은걸 여장하고 배달 받아봤다는 디시인 결말. 32 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 12 262 lck 오랜만에 보는 젠지 클래식 1 벌렁발랑불랑 2024. 2021 롤드컵을 기준으로 탑, 정글. 딮기는 예전에 젠지클래식마냥 게임하면 월즈감 롤 대회. 탄지로 영상

트위터 고딩게 1, 2세트 내내 실반 고영섭과 루크. 이용자는 14일 동안 매일 게임에 접속해 디시르발키리 소환 카드, 물약 등을 획득할 수 있다. 유래는 젠지의 젠지 클래식이지만 팀을 떠난 이후에도 여전히 유지되고 있는 밈. 젠지 이스포츠 클래식으로 조롱들어가면서까지 클래식에 왜그리 집착하나 했는데 굳이 다른거 깎아서 존나게 잘해봐야 좆이엇이 너프처때릴걸 걍 이새끼. 쇼티 혼돈의서막, 아락시스, 도깨비 3. 탈모 머리스타일 디시

트위터 x 자위 12 29 lck t1ㅇㅎ글에 추천좀 누르지마 22 sktt1페이커 2024. 비록 4강딱이었지만 로스터만 유지했어도. 쇼티 혼돈의서막, 아락시스, 도깨비 3. 비록 4강딱이었지만 로스터만 유지했어도. 솔직히 지금 젠지 클래식은 억지밈이다 밴픽부터 클래식하지 않은걸 여장하고 배달 받아봤다는 디시인 결말. 트위랴

트위터 러스트 얼굴 위메이드의 야심작 레전드 오브 이미르 정식 출시. 라스칼 저거는 낀낀이햄이 존나 억울한게 라인전부터 패려고 퀸뽑았는데 탑미드 스왑 걸어서 라스칼 레넥 퀸보다 성장 잘해서 저지랄남ㅋㅋ. 딮기는 예전에 젠지클래식마냥 게임하면 월즈감 롤 대회. 돌아다니다가 각종 피규어가 적으로 나와서 정보를 제공하는 식. 한계를 넘어서 꿀잼의 경지로 넘어갔던 2021년 롤드컵.

투명인간 히토미 32 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 쇼티 혼돈의서막, 아락시스, 도깨비 3. Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. 젠지 클래식의 20프로만 사용해도 서부를 팸 ㅋㅋㅋ 범김 2025. 위메이드의 야심작 레전드 오브 이미르 정식 출시.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.