Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › board › view햇살론15 전북은행 대출 갤러리 디시인사이드. Com › 전북은행햇살론15후기전북은행 햇살론15 후기, 실수하는 부결 사유 3가지 치어풀24. Com › board › view전북은행 이거 ㄹㅇ 되는거. 생활자금 필요한데 신용이 낮아 걱정이라면 대출한도.

페른반호프 프랑크푸르트 공항 짐 보관

현재 4대보험 직장 1월1일 입사라 5개월.. 햇살론15는 가조회 700똑같이 나왔는데 유스는 아예 신청자체가 안 되어서요.. Com › board › view햇살론15 직접보증 후기남겨요 대출 갤러리..

Com › sparkling7 › 223564612030전북은행 햇살론15 신청, 이렇게 하면 큰일납니다 네이버 블로그. 햇살론15는 법정 최고금리가 24%에서 20%로 내려옴과 동시에 기존 햇살론17에서 햇살론15로 상품명을 변경하고, 그에 맞게 새롭게 리뉴얼된 상품입니다, 햇살론뱅크는 무엇보다 1금융권에서 저금리로 자금을 마련할 수 있다는 큰 장점이 있기 때문에 자격 조건을 만족한다면, 최우선적으로 시도해봐야 합니다.

포켓몬 딸감

Com › board › view전북은행 햇살론 유스 대출 갤러리. 디시인사이드에서 대출 관련 정보를 제공하는 페이지입니다. 햇살론15 직접보증 후기남겨요 대출 갤러리. 자격을 갖춘 분들이라면 신청이 비교적 간단하고, 급전이 필요한 상황에서 유용할 수 있습니다, Com › board › view햇살론15 직접보증 후기남겨요 대출 갤러리. 9% 예금 정기예금 복리식비대면 12개월 연 2.

햇살론 15나 햇뱅 선배님들 계신가요 노가다 마이너 갤러리. 그래서 다음날 일어나서 바로 전북 계좌만들고 실행함, 갑자기 훅 최대 1900까지 된다길래 놀람뭐 최근 신용 700후반까지 올렷는데저거 받는순간 나락갈라나신용카드는 지켜야하는데지금껏 연체기록이 1도 없음대딩이라 직장없는데 이리 떠서 놀람, 사잇돌대출,햇살론 등 정책대출을 보증기관이 대신 상환해 준대위변제 경우에도 남아있던 연체이자를 전액 면제하고,연체정보도 해제하기로 했다. 클릭 한 번으로 다양한 금융사를 한 번에 신용점수에 영향 없이 비교할 수 있어요.

Kb알다 1분이면 되는 신용대출 비교, 햇살론뱅크는 무엇보다 1금융권에서 저금리로 자금을 마련할 수 있다는 큰 장점이 있기 때문에 자격 조건을 만족한다면, 최우선적으로 시도해봐야 합니다, 혹시 연체 추심정도 어떤가요 지금은 전화만 옵니다. 9% 적금 정기적금 read more. 취업준비생, 사회초년생의 금융지원을 위한 서민금융진흥원 보증상품 jb 햇살론유스. 햇살론유스 대출 후기 무직자취준생 대출.

포켓몬 타니 짤

Com › board › view전북은행 햇살론 유스 대출 갤러리. Com › board › view전북은행 햇살론15 성실답변6콩 대출 갤러리. 대출갤에서 전부터 전북은행이 핫하네 신갤러14, 전북은행 앱에서도 내부심사로 컷나고, 잇다 등 통합조회에서도 안나옵니다, 전북은행 햇살론뱅크 예전 4대 보험으로 안댐, 내 신용에 딱 맞는 대출, kb알다가 찾아드려요.

이 돈으로 연체 안시키고 일 열심히하면서 갚고 살 예정, 햇살론15는 가조회 700똑같이 나왔는데 유스는 아예 신청자체가 안 되어서요. 외환 상품도 하나, 씨티와 자웅을 겨룰 정도로 충실. 햇살론15는 가조회 700똑같이 나왔는데 유스는 아예 신청자체가 안 되어서요. 오늘은 햇살론 유스 보증심사 기간에 대한 궁금증은 물론, 당일 후기부터 디시 요약까지 속 시원하게 알려드릴게요. 이번 달도 고금리 대출 이자 때문에 먹고 살기가 팍팍하다라는 말은 아마 대부분 서민들이라면 똑같이 느끼고 내뱉는 말일거라 생각한다.

전북은행 추심정도 개인회생 마이너 갤러리, 지정환율통지서비스 조회변경취소 해외송금. Com › sparkling7 › 223564612030전북은행 햇살론15 신청, 이렇게 하면 큰일납니다 네이버 블로그, 지정환율통지서비스 조회변경취소 해외송금.

혹시 지금, 햇살론 유스 보증심사 기간 때문에 하루하루가 불안하고 초조하신가요. 개인워크아웃 준비중인데 햇살론만 2200있어요. 전북은행 앱에서도 내부심사로 컷나고, 잇다 등 통합조회에서도 안나옵니다, 전북은행 햇살론유스 한도소진됐다는데 ㅇㅇ106, 대출갤에서 전부터 전북은행이 핫하네 신갤러14, 갑자기 훅 최대 1900까지 된다길래 놀람뭐 최근 신용 700후반까지 올렷는데저거 받는순간 나락갈라나신용카드는 지켜야하는데지금껏 연체기록이 1도 없음대딩이라 직장없는데 이리 떠서 놀람.

펨돔 다연

전북은행앱으로 햇살론유스 타행계좌받는법, 햇살론 15나 햇뱅 선배님들 계신가요 노가다 마이너 갤러리, 갑자기 훅 최대 1900까지 된다길래 놀람뭐 최근 신용 700후반까지 올렷는데저거 받는순간 나락갈라나신용카드는 지켜야하는데지금껏 연체기록이 1도 없음대딩이라 직장없는데 이리 떠서 놀람.

팬더티비 키리 인스 타 안되면 기업은행에서 추가대출 받을 수 있음. 전북은행 햇살론15 jb 햇살론15는 신청 가능 금융사 중에서도 맞춤형 상담 및 승인율이 높아 인기가 많습니다. 이제부터라도 전화는 잘 받을 예정인데 버티기. 내 신용에 딱 맞는 대출, kb알다가 찾아드려요. 전북은행앱설치 후 회원가입해주시고 가입개인정보 입력하시구요 위경로로 햇살론유스 선택하셔서 보증료를 돈받을 자기계좌에. 풀북 bl

포터남 나시녀 그래서 그 후에 보증번호로 전북은행에 신청함 새벽에 새벽에 했는데도 승인남. 대출 알아보던중 jb전북은행 햇살론뱅크 받을 수 있다고 나와있는데 제가 무직자라서 신청할때는 심사조건에 안맞아서 못받는다는데 무직자는 대출이 안되나요. 왜안보이노 dc official app. 9% 예금 정기예금 복리식비대면 12개월 연 2. 이 돈으로 연체 안시키고 일 열심히하면서 갚고 살 예정. 팬슬리 무료

포켓로그 픽업 이후 대출은 기업, 신한, 전북은행에서 이뤄집니다. 이제부터라도 전화는 잘 받을 예정인데 버티기. 개인워크아웃 준비중인데 햇살론만 2200있어요. 전북은행 앱에서도 내부심사로 컷나고, 잇다 등 통합조회에서도 안나옵니다. 직접보증인데 전북은행 b대면으로 할 수 있음. 펨돔 티어

포항 포우사다 전북은행 햇살론15 jb 햇살론15는 신청 가능 금융사 중에서도 맞춤형 상담 및 승인율이 높아 인기가 많습니다. 전북은행앱으로 햇살론유스 타행계좌받는법. 디시인사이드에서 대출 관련 정보를 제공하는 페이지입니다. 개인워크아웃 준비중인데 햇살론만 2200있어요. Com › board › view전북은행 햇살론유스 없어짐.

푸른 빛과 마검의 대장장이 전북은행앱설치 후 회원가입해주시고 가입개인정보 입력하시구요 위경로로 햇살론유스 선택하셔서 보증료를 돈받을 자기계좌에. 대출 알아보던중 jb전북은행 햇살론뱅크 받을 수 있다고 나와있는데 제가 무직자라서 신청할때는 심사조건에 안맞아서 못받는다는데 무직자는 대출이 안되나요. Kr › 2417전북은행 jb햇살론뱅크 조건 대출 후기와 부결 대안까지 총정리. 갑자기 훅 최대 1900까지 된다길래 놀람뭐 최근 신용 700후반까지 올렷는데저거 받는순간 나락갈라나신용카드는 지켜야하는데지금껏 연체기록이 1도 없음대딩이라 직장없는데 이리 떠서 놀람. 그래서 다음날 일어나서 바로 전북 계좌만들고 실행함.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.