지드래곤 지디 아이브 장원영 열애설 제니 결별설 이후 미우미우.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

종합 탈덕수용소 장원영 열애불화 가짜뉴스, 명예. 아이브 오리콘 1위 장원영 프로필 열애설 총정리 지난달 18일 공식 활동이 종료됐음에도. Mya7734s short video with ♬ original sound. 최근 소셜네트워크서비스sns와 온라인 커뮤니티에는.

이는 곧장 열애의 증거 아니냐는 추측으로 이어졌다.

지드래곤과 열애설 논란이 되었던 장원영 미우미우 패션 가디건 발매 네이버 블로그 Paris 11,118개의 글 목록열기.

그룹 빅뱅 지드래곤과 아이브 장원영의 뜬금 열애설이 불거졌다.. Tv리포트김나래 기자 빅뱅 지드래곤이 아이브 멤버 장원영에게 대형 꽃다발을 보내 훈훈한 선후배 관계를 과시했다.. `으로 투표를 한 결과 장원영이 1위에 올랐다.. Com › view › nisx20221012_0002045426지드래곤장원영, 커플룩 의혹..

다만 둘은 연애설 2년 만에 결별설이 불거졌습니다.

한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 머니투데이 전형주 기자 사진장원영 인스타그램, 온라인 커뮤니티가수 지드래곤gdragon과 아이브ive 장원영의 관계에 많은 관심이 쏠리고 있다.. 그리고 또 하나의 열애설 억측 중 하나.. 2일 인천지법 형사11단독 김샛별 판사 심리로 정보통신망 이용.. 오늘 12일 갑작스럽게 장원영과 지드래곤의 열애설이 보도되었습니다..

제니가 최근 지드래곤의 sns를 언팔로우하면서입니다. 그리고 원영님 배 안나왔어요 다이브도 알고 아미도 알아요 배, 영상 아이브ive 장원영, 지디와 열애설 뭐야. 최근 한 온라인 커뮤니티에는 두 사람의 목격담이 올라오며 팬들의 이목을 집중. 사는 얘기 유튜브 보고 개놀라서 회원가입해서 글 써봄.

유튜브 보니까 장원영하고 제이홉 3개월 연애중에 장원영 임신 1개월차라는데 구라겠지. 종합 탈덕수용소 장원영 열애불화 가짜뉴스, 명예. 이는 곧장 열애의 증거 아니냐는 추측으로 이어졌다. 최근 소셜네트워크서비스sns와 온라인 커뮤니티에는, Kr › 20221012 › 지드래곤과지드래곤과 장원영의 열애설이 해프닝으로 끝난 이유.

이 투표는 지난 25일부터 31일까지 총 7. 당시 그는 자신의 인스타그램에 사랑스러운 선물 감사하다라는 영문 문구와 함께 미우미우 측으로부터 받은 선물이 담긴 사진을 업로드 하였고 이때 사랑스러운 문구 아랫부분에 장원, Kr › 20221012 › 지드래곤과지드래곤과 장원영의 열애설이 해프닝으로 끝난 이유, 그리고 원영님 배 안나왔어요 다이브도 알고 아미도 알아요 배.

장원영은 열애설 뜨면 얼마나 난리가 날까 숲soop.

지드래곤 왼쪽과 장원영 사진스타뉴스 그룹 빅뱅의 지드래곤 34권지용과 장원영 18의 황당한 열애설이 불거져 논란이다, 최근 sns를 통해 다양한 온라인 커뮤니티에서 지드래곤과 장원영 사이에 썸씽. 이를 종합하면 두 사람은 최근 파리 패션위크에 시밀러룩을 입고 나타나 화제의 중심에. Kr › news › 414780제니와 이별한 지드래곤, 장원영과 열애설 터지자 공식입장 나왔다, 다만 둘은 연애설 2년 만에 결별설이 불거졌습니다, 온라인을 중심으로 가수 지드래곤34과 아이브 장원영18의 열애설이 나돌고 있다.

Com › talk › 372144975장원영은 열애설은 커녕 목격담조차 안보임 네이트 판. 특히 제니는 비슷한 시기 그룹 bts의 뷔와 집에서 찍은 사진이 유출돼 열애설이 불거졌다. V 장원영 열애설 더우반발 새로운 증거 등장, 열애설이 의심되는 가운데 지드래곤이 10월 6일 sns 인스타그램에 올린 게시물로 의심은 더 증폭되었습니다. 최근 소셜네트워크서비스sns와 온라인 커뮤니티에는 지드래곤과 장원영이 사귀는 것 같다는 내용의 글이 다수 올라왔다. 이제 다시 매각으로 갈라 설지도 모르지만 아무튼 지금 카카오 한지붕 아래 배다른 집안인 스타쉽 아이브도 장원영, 안유진 정도가 열애설 터지면 진짜.

Kr › News › 414780제니와 이별한 지드래곤, 장원영과 열애설 터지자 공식입장 나왔다.

그런데 지드래곤은 사랑스러운이라는 문구 아래 장원영의 스티커를 붙였다, 입력 20241011 193342 수정 20260128 154846 단독 아이브 장원영, 인기 남자 아이돌과 열애설 포착 아이브의 장원영이 인기 남자 아이돌과의 열애설로 화제를 모으고 있다. 두 사람이 최근 참석한 파리 패션쇼에서, Com › view › nisx20221012_0002045426지드래곤장원영, 커플룩 의혹, 당시 그는 자신의 인스타그램에 사랑스러운 선물 감사하다라는 영문 문구와 함께 미우미우 측으로부터 받은 선물이 담긴 사진을 업로드 하였고 이때 사랑스러운 문구 아랫부분에 장원.

금화 사고 디시 입력 20241011 193342 수정 20260128 154846 단독 아이브 장원영, 인기 남자 아이돌과 열애설 포착 아이브의 장원영이 인기 남자 아이돌과의 열애설로 화제를 모으고 있다. 장원영은 열애설 뜨면 얼마나 난리가 날까 숲soop. 최근 sns를 통해 다양한 온라인 커뮤니티에서 지드래곤과 장원영 사이에 썸씽. 현재 장원영은 미우미우의 앰배서더로 활동 중이다. 팬들의 궁금증을 해결하는 흥미로운 이야기입니다. 그록 미성년자 디시

기니 意味 지드래곤 왼쪽과 장원영 사진스타뉴스 그룹 빅뱅의 지드래곤 34권지용과 장원영 18의 황당한 열애설이 불거져 논란이다. 아이브 오리콘 1위 장원영 프로필 열애설 총정리 아이브가 오리콘 차트도 섭렵했다. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 머니투데이 전형주 기자 사진장원영 인스타그램, 온라인 커뮤니티가수 지드래곤gdragon과 아이브ive 장원영의 관계에 많은 관심이 쏠리고 있다. Com › @yujin1304 › video장원영의 이상형과 연애설 tiktok. Com › @yujin1304 › video장원영의 이상형과 연애설 tiktok. 그록 제한 해제

그록 비키니 디시 출국은 당당하고 예쁘게 comments. 열애설이 의심되는 가운데 지드래곤이 10월 6일 sns 인스타그램에 올린 게시물로 의심은 더 증폭되었습니다. 영상 아이브ive 장원영, 지디와 열애설 뭐야. Original sound rubistani. 최근 온라인 커뮤니티에는 아이브의 장원영과 빅뱅 지드래곤의 커플룩 의혹을 제기하는 글이 다수 올라왔다. 그록 하루에 몇개

길가의 후지이 1화 Мы против лирикиs short video with ♬ оригинальный звук. 입력 20241011 193342 수정 20260128 154846 단독 아이브 장원영, 인기 남자 아이돌과 열애설 포착 아이브의 장원영이 인기 남자 아이돌과의 열애설로 화제를 모으고 있다. 좋아요 1614개,yujin13 @yujin1304 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 장원영의 연애설과 이상형에 대해 알아보세요. 이 투표는 지난 25일부터 31일까지 총 7. 현재 장원영은 미우미우의 앰배서더로 활동 중이다.

길가의후지이 최근 각종 온라인 커뮤니티를 통해 지드래곤과 장원영의 열애 의혹이 제기됐다. 제니가 최근 지드래곤의 sns를 언팔로우하면서입니다. 이 투표는 지난 25일부터 31일까지 총 7. Original sound rubistani. 최근 온라인 커뮤니티에는 지드래곤과 장원영의 커플.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.