Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

그러나 그 흠결은 청와대 가 직접 발표한 것이고, 장미인애 본인은 이미 대중의 관심에서 멀어져 열애설에 관심을 가질 만한 사람도 적기 때문에 황당무계한 착각일 가능성이 높다. 2 결국 검찰은 현영을 벌금 500만원에 약식기소하였고, 장미인애 등 나머지 3명은 정식 재판에 넘겼다. 안뜬다고 피싸던놈이 이젠 경쟁할정도로 잘쳐먹노. Com › article › view이슈is 장미인애허웅, 롯데월드 목격담+럽스타그램 눈길 일간스.

투디갤 국가설정

이천수 여자관계 대단하네 연예인 3명 ㄷㄷ미스코리아 진 배우 김민경 베이비복스 심은진 장미인애 3명 ㄷㄷ.. Com › board › basketballredirecting to sgall..

탄지로 카나오 임신

터미널 뒷보지

장미인애, 인스타 dm 스폰서 제안 재력가와 연결두번째. 강유미랑 장미인애랑 얼굴이 똑같애 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ어떻게 저렇게 똑같냐. 내가 심심할때찾아보는 사람들 장미인애 박새암 효민.

테무윈터 야동

장미인애 혼전임신, 볼록한 배의 d라인 속 각선미와 비율. Net › square › 485772250더쿠 장미인애 5년째 활동 없는 이유, 특히 최근 임신을 한 장미인애의 볼록한 배의 d라인의 눈길을 끈다.

저는 잘못 살지 않았습니다라고 열애설을 부인하는 자기 뜻을 밝혔다.. 우선 장미인애를 사랑해 주신 팬 여러분과 대중들에게 이번 일로 심려를 끼쳐 드려 대단히 죄송하다는 말씀을 드리고자 합니다.. 음악중심 역대 진행자 전직 배우 2020년 은퇴.. 디시인사이드에 있는 유튜브 마이너 갤러리..

트위터 게시물

배우 장미인애가 9세 연하 농구선수 허웅과의 열애설에 반박을 넘어 분노했다, 허1웅이 열애하는 여자 문제 아니라 허1웅 성욕 이후 노1콘이 문제임. 지난 5월 디시인사이드 농구갤러리에서는 허웅과 장미인애의 열애설 증거로 인스타그램 캡쳐가 올라왔다. 당시 보고싶다 제작발표회에서 박유천이 장미인애 씨에게 죄송하다고 미안함을 드러내기도 했다, 거리에서 루비짱과 함께 대전 필라테스 소개. 2 결국 검찰은 현영을 벌금 500만원에 약식기소하였고, 장미인애 등 나머지 3명은 정식 재판에 넘겼다.

Com › osen › 한국에서배우안해한국에서 배우 안해장미인애, 정부 비난 논란→은퇴 암시. 장미인애 올림이라는 메시지로 글을 맺어 눈길을 끌었다. 38 1635 2 0 19675189 보검수지는 커플명부터 글렀어 해산해 ㅇㅇ39, 음악중심 역대 진행자 전직 배우 2020년 은퇴.

트위터 gangbang 장미인애 뭔가 사자성어같음 농구 갤러리. 36 1635 0 0 19675190 굿보이 허성태 인스타 박보검씬 바로 이사람 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅇㅇ223. 내가 심심할때찾아보는 사람들 장미인애 박새암 효민. Com › osen › 한국에서배우안해한국에서 배우 안해장미인애, 정부 비난 논란→은퇴 암시. Com › osen › 한국에서배우안해한국에서 배우 안해장미인애, 정부 비난 논란→은퇴 암시. 트위터 s2couple19

태국 섹트 Com › article › view이슈is 장미인애허웅, 롯데월드 목격담+럽스타그램 눈길 일간스. 여동생인 1993년생 장미나는 1995년 앙팡 표지모델로 데뷔한 아역배우 출신으로 sbs 시트콤 웬만해선 그들을 막을 수 없다에 출연하여 인기를 얻었지만 2003년 연예계 활동을 접고 미국으로 유학을 떠났다. 당시 보고싶다 제작발표회에서 박유천이 장미인애 씨에게 죄송하다고 미안함을 드러내기도 했다. 장미인애, 인스타 dm 스폰서 제안 재력가와 연결두번째. 안뜬다고 피싸던놈이 이젠 경쟁할정도로 잘쳐먹노. 테라박스 처벌 디시

트위터 nice jav 그런데 장미인애가 분출한 분노는 열애설보다는, 자신에게 일어난. My favorite bikini top with flower stitching. 36 1635 0 0 19675190 굿보이 허성태 인스타 박보검씬 바로 이사람 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅇㅇ223. 내가 심심할때찾아보는 사람들 장미인애 박새암 효민. 저는 잘못 살지 않았습니다라고 열애설을 부인하는 자기 뜻을 밝혔다. 탄지로 남동생

통통한 av배우 2 결국 검찰은 현영을 벌금 500만원에 약식기소하였고, 장미인애 등 나머지 3명은 정식 재판에 넘겼다. 장미인애, 인스타 dm 스폰서 제안 재력가와 연결두번째. 장미인애 뭔가 사자성어같음 농구 갤러리. 강유미랑 장미인애랑 얼굴이 똑같애 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ어떻게 저렇게 똑같냐. 꽃무늬 원피스를 입고 있는 장미인애의 각선미와 비율이 돋보인다.

탄지로 gif 38 1635 2 0 19675189 보검수지는 커플명부터 글렀어 해산해 ㅇㅇ39. 그러나 그 흠결은 청와대 가 직접 발표한 것이고, 장미인애 본인은 이미 대중의 관심에서 멀어져 열애설에 관심을 가질 만한 사람도 적기 때문에 황당무계한 착각일 가능성이 높다. Kr › news › article프로포폴 투약혐의 장미인애 강력부인 의사처방 따라 맞았다. Com › osen › 한국에서배우안해한국에서 배우 안해장미인애, 정부 비난 논란→은퇴 암시. 장미인애 라이벌이 등장햇구나 클로저스 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.