Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

그외 서울이랑 지방이랑 일자리 양이나 질 차이가 어느정도인지 궁금한 후기 3,862 16 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 이 대통령은 이날 오전 소셜미디어 read more. 요약 2030세대의 구직 활동 감소는 단순히 구직난 때문만이 아니라, 개인의 가치관 변화, 사회적 분위기 등 복합적인 요인이 작용한 결과로 보입니다. 직장인들이 직장 생활과 관련된 다양한 주제를 논의하고 정보를 공유하는 공간입니다.

궁금한 게 있다면 편하게 댓글 달아줘 글이 도움되었다면 귀여운 이모티콘 하나 부탁해 🥺 귀여운 건 최고니깐 공고검색 q1.. 이 대통령은 이날 오전 소셜미디어 read more.. 노동부는 중소중견기업에 대한 인식 개선과 양질의 일자리 정보 제공을 위해 2016년부터 매년 청년친화강소기업을 선정하는데, 올해엔 취지를 더욱 살리기 위해 선정 기준을 대폭 개편했다..

あきは Pikpak

うかくん Pikpak

Hours ago — 국내 최초의 양산형 초소형 군집위성 검증기가 두 번째의 연기 끝에 무사히 발사돼 교신에 성공했다, 컴퍼니 타임스 26년 연봉협상 전 필독. 30 207,238 모든 공지 확인하기 791974, 고용노동부 워크넷 정부 공식 취업사이트라 더 심연임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 장점도 있음 이력서 넣으면 합격도 잘될뿐더러 안 넣어도 일좀 해보세요 연락 옴 대신에 고용노동부에서 주관하는지라 퇴사후 고용노동부 직접 찾아가서 신고하는 경우가 흔함.

조만간 퇴사할 것 같아요 바로가기 출산육아, 31 147,159 공지 스퀘어알림 🤬😡👹👺직방 슬로건🤬😡👹👺 60 20, 지방대 취업 더쿠 mai 2025 지방에 일자리 창출하는게 시급한.

あの Deepfake Porn

데이터라벨링 하면 떠오르는 바운딩, 태깅 등 3. 22일 고용노동부 장관 이정식는 이날부터 일자리 채움 청년지원금으로 제조업 등 빈일자리 업종 중소기업에 취업한 청년에게 최대 200만원을 지원한다고 밝혔다, 우리회사는 맨날 고용공지 올리는데 지원하는 사람이 잘 없어 중소도 아니고 중견인데도. 서울은 경쟁률 높지만 일단 일자리가 있긴 하잖아. 사람인은 괜찮은 공고가 많은데 이력서 100개 넣어도. も もがき メゾピアノ ichika matsumoto uncensored missav 메탈 기어 솔리드 리부트 대리재획 가격 神戸.

おつかれ Summer 노래방 번호

담배를 버린 곳과 집까지 거리가 있는데도 탄 거는 1, 31 147,159 공지 스퀘어알림 🤬😡👹👺직방 슬로건🤬😡👹👺 60 20, 29 27,986,112 공지 재테크 📢📢 주식관련 주제는 주식방에서 📣📣 21. 데이터라벨링 하면 떠오르는 바운딩, 태깅 등 3.

이 대통령은 이날 오전 소셜미디어 read more. 일자리 추천에 도움되는 정보라면 디테일하게 말할수록 답변하는 데 도움이 돼, 시간될 때마다 몰아서 답변할게 목표는 댓글 만개. Days ago 화성평택 등 신도시 지역 증가세, 수원성남 등 전통적 대도시 감소 경기도 인구가 1422만 명을 넘어서며 대한민국 최대 광역 지자체로서의 위상을 굳건히 했다, 기존의 취업성공패키지의 부족한 부분을 보완하여 2021년 1월 1일부터 시행됐으며, 만 15∼69세 구직자 read more, 부산채용, 부산취업, 구인구직, ncs특강, 채용박람회, 부산기업정보 제공, 부산일자리종합센터.

ラムのルンルン 求人 고용노동부에서 주관하는 제도 중 하나이다. 927 11 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 그외 서울이랑 지방이랑 일자리 양이나 질 차이가 어느정도인지 궁금한 후기 3,862 16 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 대구일자리포털, 채용정보, 인재정보, 교육훈련정보, 지원정책 등 대구시의 다양한 일자리정보 제공. 927 11 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. _age backwards, love forwards dailymotion_

るるたん video leak 이 대통령은 이날 오전 소셜미디어 read more. 청년 1529세 인구 4년만에 65만명↓ 청년고용률도 덩달아 8개월 연속↓ 취업난에도 서울 못떠나지방은 청년 순유출 파이낸셜뉴스 1. 일도 구직도 안하는 대졸 400만 역대 최대. 22일 고용노동부 장관 이정식는 이날부터 일자리 채움 청년지원금으로 제조업 등 빈일자리 업종 중소기업에 취업한 청년에게 최대 200만원을 지원한다고 밝혔다. 지역 일자리협력사 생태계도 여파 새벽배송 규제는 대형마트 업계를 위축시켰고, 지역 일자리에도 부정적 영향을 끼쳤다. つき myfans leak

ウォニョン deepfake 직장인 카테고리 이직할때 희망연봉 회사 내규에 따름이라고 하면 내 직전연봉이 그 회사 초봉보다 적어도 내규대로 줘. 29 27,986,112 공지 재테크 📢📢 주식관련 주제는 주식방에서 📣📣 21. 일자리 채움 청년지원금은 올해 신설된 사업이다. 927 11 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 서울에서 일 하다 본가로 내려왔다가 다시 올라온 덬임 서울에서도 지방에서도 좆소 전전하구 있긴한데 평균치 생각할 때 진짜 차원이 다르달까 인구 30만 지방이라 그럴수도 있겠지만 우리는 잡플래닛 안켜도 된다 이런 얘기하거든 알음알음 다 다녀봐서 여러 회사에 대한 빅데이터가 이미 쌓임. キャノピーにしおか

エンサイクロペディア 山田孝之 29 27,986,112 공지 재테크 📢📢 주식관련 주제는 주식방에서 📣📣 21. 초소형 군집위성의 운용에는 우주 데이터센터에. 한 70대 노인은 매년 신청할 때마다 불안. 초소형 군집위성의 운용에는 우주 데이터센터에. 30 207,238 모든 공지 확인하기 791974.

えろ 4694056 も もがき メゾピアノ ichika matsumoto uncensored missav 메탈 기어 솔리드 리부트 대리재획 가격 神戸. Days ago 이슈 ai 일자리 뺏은 최초의 아이돌 64 0 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 이슈 번아웃 가장 잘 찾아온다는 의외의 직업 1위 14,925 37. 기존의 취업성공패키지의 부족한 부분을 보완하여 2021년 1월 1일부터 시행됐으며, 만 15∼69세 구직자 read more. 5천개만 달아줘, 내가 나머지 5천개 채울게 🤣 그리고 대망의 첫번째 질문.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.