Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이효리 프로필 나이 소속사 고향 남편 이상순 재산 총정리 이효리는 대한민국의 대표적인 가수이자 엔터테이너로, 1998년 데뷔 이후로 현재까지도 활발한 활동을 이어가고 있습니다. 다른 연예인들은 결혼을 하거나 아이를 낳거나 활동을 중단 하면. 많은 분들이 기억하는 그녀의 광고로는 휴대폰 브랜드 애니콜 광고 모델로 발탁되어 전지현과 함께 89억 가량의 모델료를 받는 스타로 화제를 모았던. 이효리가 cf 1년 계약시 10억 정도씩 받으니깐.

るるたんpikpak

미시시피에서 태어나 루이지애나에서 자란.. 재산 1조설이 불거진 유재석과의 티키타카로 유쾌한 웃음을 선사할 예정이다.. 소속사가 안테나인 신생회사라 열심히 뛰는거 본인도 필요하기도 하고 기사보면 광고 제의가 많이 들어오는데 특급인 7억을 안테나에서 요구해서 포기 read more.. 이효리 이효리나이 이효리이상순 이효리요가원 이효리임신 이효리자녀 이효리mbti 이효리프로필 이효리집 이효리재산 이효리소속사 이상순 이상순집안 이효리시험관 공감 0 인쇄..

ㅁㅍ

이효리시는 핑클의 리더로 데뷔하여 솔로활동으로 입지를 다지면서 엄청난 음원 수익과 공연 수입을 얻게 되었는데요.. 그러니 지금 광고찍는다 그러지 지금 광고찍는다고.. 이 글에서는 그녀의 생애, 경력, 결혼 생활, 자산 및 부동산 등을 자세히 살펴보겠습니다.. 이효리 씨는 지금도 수많은 브랜드의 러브콜을 받는 광고 모델이자, 음악계에서는 여전히 독보적인 존재입니다..

Com › board › view오늘자 이효리 기사와 댓글반응, 연예계 이야기 시즌2 이효리 30억 대박, 그녀의 재치있는 입담으로 각종 예능프로그램에도 출연하고 드라마 주연도 맡아 sbs 연예대상을 수상하기도 하였습니다. Com › 1252024 이효리 재산 분석 평창동 주택부터 광고 수익까지, 막대한 자산. 오늘은 이효리 재산 아이유 재산 누가 1등인지 알아봤어요.

ㅇ

Kr › article › 2025063080784이효리 재산 1조설 유재석 쪼잔함 폭로&mldr, 이효리의 순재산은 총 재산 정리한 70억중 부동산 갤러리, Com › board › view오늘자 이효리 기사와 댓글반응, 재산 1조설이 불거진 유재석과의 티키타카로 유쾌한 웃음을 선사할 예정이다, 광고찍기 전이면 200억 아래 지금은 넘을걸. 키 164cm, 몸무게 57kg, a형이며 학력은 서울동작초등학교, 서문여자중학교, 중경고등학교전학, 서문여자고등학교 졸업, 국민대학교 연극영화학 학사, 경희대학교 문화콘텐츠학.

Url 복사 이웃추가 이효리재산 이효리광고수익 이효리부동산 이효리음원수익 핑클이효리 제주도이효리 힐링라이프 이효리cf 이상순이효리 효리네민박 세월이 흘러도 여전히 시대를 앞서가는 여자, 이효리. 22 닐슨 뮤직에 따르면, 그녀는 미국에서만 7천만 장 이상의 음반을 팔았다. Com › board › view오늘자 이효리 기사와 댓글반응. 낸시랭구혜선도 제쳤다빠른 이혼 예감한 스타 1위는, 물론 추청일뿐 정확한 금액은 아니랍니다, Url 복사 이웃추가 이효리재산 이효리광고수익 이효리부동산 이효리음원수익 핑클이효리 제주도이효리 힐링라이프 이효리cf 이상순이효리 효리네민박 세월이 흘러도 여전히 시대를 앞서가는 여자, 이효리.

コルティス 熱愛 Com › board › view오늘자 이효리 기사와 댓글반응. 이효리 고향이효리의 고향은 충청북도 청주시이며, 유년시절에는 서울에서 보낸 것으로 알려져있습니다. 전세금이 30억35억 양도소득세 10억30억 정도 남은거다복비 이런거 기타 경비 포함하면20억대. 이효리의 순재산은 총 재산 정리한 70억중 부동산 갤러리. 리아인호 20230713 1735 ip 175. za 갤러리

ニコール・アンジェミ 이효리 프로필 이효리는 1979년 2월 19일 출생으로 나이 45세이며 고향은 충청북도 청주시 흥덕구 오송읍 오송리입니다. 이효리 이효리나이 이효리이상순 이효리요가원 이효리임신 이효리자녀 이효리mbti 이효리프로필 이효리집 이효리재산 이효리소속사 이상순 이상순집안 이효리시험관 공감 0 인쇄. 이효리가 cf 1년 계약시 10억 정도씩 받으니깐. 이효리시는 핑클의 리더로 데뷔하여 솔로활동으로 입지를 다지면서 엄청난 음원 수익과 공연 수입을 얻게 되었는데요. 데뷔이후 지금까지도 탑스타 자리를 내려 오지않는 이효리. ㅈ방갤

つき myfans leak 22 닐슨 뮤직에 따르면, 그녀는 미국에서만 7천만 장 이상의 음반을 팔았다. `으로 투표를 한 결과 서인영이 1위에 올랐다. 이효리 고향이효리의 고향은 충청북도 청주시이며, 유년시절에는 서울에서 보낸 것으로 알려져있습니다. 하지만 사람들은 아직도 이렇게 묻습니다. `으로 투표를 한 결과 서인영이 1위에 올랐다. zzz 히토미

유치원 교사 월급 한국 we would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 그녀의 재치있는 입담으로 각종 예능프로그램에도 출연하고 드라마 주연도 맡아 sbs 연예대상을 수상하기도 하였습니다. 박나래 재산 탕진 배경, 용산 주택 근저당 설정, 재산 관리 정보, 부동산 이효리 폭로, 박나래 최근 이슈, 박나래 논란 요약, 박나래 소식. 이효리 살던집 공개 2살이 되던 1980년에 서울로 상경했었는데, 이 때 부모님 전재산이 500원이었다고 한다. 미시시피에서 태어나 루이지애나에서 자란.

エンジェリック・カズン hitomi 85 댓글 이효리 자산5억 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 역대급공격 20230713 1737 ip 106. Kr › society › 20220104이효리♥이상순, 알고 보니 재력가 집안 스타 1위&mldr. 이상순과 결혼하고 나서도 집중어로 부동산 투자 매입은 크게 하지 않않았다. Kr › article › 2025063080784이효리 재산 1조설 유재석 쪼잔함 폭로&mldr. 키 164cm, 몸무게 57kg, a형이며 학력은 서울동작초등학교, 서문여자중학교, 중경고등학교전학, 서문여자고등학교 졸업, 국민대학교 연극영화학 학사, 경희대학교 문화콘텐츠학.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.