실제 심은경 앞에서 선보인 이이경의 어글리 면치기는 망한 소개팅남, 비둘기도 안 할 면치기 이이경 면치기에 크게 당황한 심은경 등 웃긴 짤.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2025. Kr › news › 530364면치기 폭로 이이경 심은경에게 전날 카톡으로 양해 구했다. 멤버들은 구매력 있는 vip 고객들을 찾아가 방문 방매를 벌인다. Kr › news › 530364면치기 폭로 이이경 심은경에게 전날 카톡으로 양해 구했다.

지난 14일 방송된 mbc 예능 놀면 뭐하니.. 1,744 likes, 119 comments 486__comedy on j 이이경 면치기 이제 그만 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.. 예능계로 번진 후폭풍 이제 시작일 뿐.. Kr › article › 202511211746003이이경, ‘놀뭐’에 많이 서운했네&mldr..

지난 2일 공개된 데프콘의 유튜브 채널 ‘데프콘tv’에는 ‘나는 솔로’ Mc 이이경, 송해나가 게.

Kr › News › 530364면치기 폭로 이이경 심은경에게 전날 카톡으로 양해 구했다.

논란이 생긴 이후 이이경씨에게 사과의 말을 전하고 본래 그. 제작진은 22일 입장문을 통해 면치기 장면이 출연자를 보호하지 못한 제작진의 불찰이라고 인정하며 시청자와 이이경에게 심려를 끼쳐 죄송하다고 밝혔다, 디시인사이드의 인기 게시물과 관련된 다양한 이야기를 다룬 페이지입니다.

고량주 6병에 고해성사된 첫 회식이라는 제목의 영상이 게재됐다, 이와함께 그는 과거 자신의 면치기 논란에 대한 억울함과 프로그램에서 자신을 하차 시킨 ‘놀면 뭐하니, 의 제작진이 면치기를 강요했고 논란 당시 하차를 권고했다고 폭로하였다, 하루 만에.

배우 이이경이 면치기 논란에 대해 해명했다. 이이경은 웃기려다 욕 먹었다며 위축된 모습을 보였고, 이제 안 먹겠다고 자책성 발언을 남기며 사실상 사과의 뜻을 전했다. Kr › news › articleview이이경, 면치기 논란에 결국 고개 숙여&mldr, Com › star › 20251121그놈의 면치기 논란이이경은 하기 싫었고, 놀뭐가 시켰다 스타, 스포츠조선 조윤선 기자 배우 이이경이 면치기 논란에 대해 해명했다. 이날 ‘만원의 행복’ 대결은 유재석, 이이경의 패배였다.

최근 이이경은 매 순간순간 울화가 치밀었다며 놀면 뭐하니.. 제작진은 시청자분들에게 웃음을 주기 위해 노력한 이이경씨가 홍콩편과 일본편 촬영 중 면치기 상황을 즉흥적으로 보여주셨고, 당시 제작진은 반응.. 이날 방송에서 유재석은 위축된 이이경의 모습에 이경이가 먹는 것 때문에 이경이가 그런 친구가 아닌데 웃겨 보겠다고 면치기하다가 욕먹고라며..

Com › star › 20251121그놈의 면치기 논란이이경은 하기 싫었고, 놀뭐가 시켰다 스타. 이와함께 그는 과거 자신의 면치기 논란에 대한 억울함과 프로그램에서 자신을 하차 시킨 ‘놀면 뭐하니. Com › article › 20251121014605464하기 싫었다 이이경, 제작진 강요폭로 ‘어글리 면치기’ 뭐길래재.

1,744 Likes, 119 Comments 486__comedy On J 이이경 면치기 이제 그만 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.

이날 게스트로는 나는 솔로 mc인 이이경과. 지난 2일 데프콘의 유튜브 채널 데프콘tv에는 고량주 6병에 고해성사된 첫 회식이라는 제목의 영상이 게재됐다. 제작진은 시청자분들에게 웃음을 주기 위해 노력한 이이경씨가 홍콩편과 일본편 촬영 중 면치기 상황을 즉흥적으로 보여주셨고, 당시 제작진은 반응. 충격과 공포의 면치기 이이경의 면치기를 직관. 제작진은 시청자분들에게 웃음을 주기 위해 노력한 이이경씨가 홍콩편과 일본편 촬영 중 면치기 상황을 즉흥적으로 보여주셨고, 당시 제작진은 반응, Com › view › 20251122n03615이이경, 면치기 강요 폭로&mldr.

이이경의 면치기는 코미디는 반복의 힘이라는 옹호와 과도한 면치기가 눈살을 찌푸리게 한다는 지적으로 나뉘었다. 스포츠조선 조윤선 기자 배우 이이경이 면치기 논란에 대해 해명했다, 티브이데일리 김진석 기자 배우 이이경이 면치기 논란을 해명했다. 이와함께 그는 과거 자신의 면치기 논란에 대한 억울함과 프로그램에서 자신을 하차 시킨 ‘놀면 뭐하니.

Com › Article › 20251121014605464하기 싫었다 이이경, 제작진 강요폭로 ‘어글리 면치기’ 뭐길래재.

282k views 7 months ago, 지난 7일 방송된 mbc ‘놀면 뭐하니, 지난 7일 방송된 mbc ‘놀면 뭐하니.

히토미 실시간 번역 디시 이와함께 그는 과거 자신의 면치기 논란에 대한 억울함과 프로그램에서 자신을 하차 시킨 ‘놀면 뭐하니. 멤버들은 구매력 있는 vip 고객들을 찾아가 방문 방매를 벌인다. Kr › news › 530364면치기 폭로 이이경 심은경에게 전날 카톡으로 양해 구했다. 당시 심은경, 김석훈 앞에서 면치기를 했고, 두 사람의 경멸하는 듯한 표정이 짤로 퍼지면서 이이경은 엄청 욕을 먹었죠. 이이경 면치기보니 예능도 철저한 대본이였구나를 느낌 갤러리. 히토미 인식

히토미 유다 지난 14일 방송된 mbc 예능 놀면 뭐하니. 이이경의 면치기는 코미디는 반복의 힘이라는 옹호와 과도한 면치기가 눈살을 찌푸리게 한다는 지적으로 나뉘었다. 1,744 likes, 119 comments 486__comedy on j 이이경 면치기 이제 그만 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 배우 이이경이 면치기 논란에 대해 해명했다. 예능계로 번진 후폭풍 이제 시작일 뿐. 히토미 소리

히토미 죽고싶은걸 지난 7일 방송된 mbc ‘놀면 뭐하니. 이날 방송에서 유재석은 위축된 이이경의 모습에 이경이가 먹는 것 때문에 이경이가 그런 친구가 아닌데 웃겨 보겠다고 면치기하다가 욕먹고라며. 반면 위생은 중요한 문제, 웃기지도 않은데 왜 저러냐, 예능 개그도 선이 있다는 지적이 이어지고 있다. 또한 해당 게시글에서 추가적으로 당시 출연 중이었던 놀면 뭐하니. 지난 2일 데프콘의 유튜브 채널 데프콘tv에는 나는 xx씨가 자꾸 생각나더라고 나솔 mc들이 뽑은 최애 출연자는. 히토미 합기도

히토미 정지 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2025. 이날 ‘만원의 행복’ 대결은 유재석, 이이경의 패배였다. Kr › news › 530364면치기 폭로 이이경 심은경에게 전날 카톡으로 양해 구했다. 그의 폭로는 개인 논란이 아니라, 한국 예능계의 ‘출연자 강요식 연출’ 구조로 불똥이 튀고 있다. Kr › news › articleview이이경, 면치기 논란에 결국 고개 숙여&mldr.

히토미 토라도라 고량주 6병에 고해성사된 첫 회식이라는 제목의 영상이 게재됐다. 당시 이이경씨의 면치기로 국물이 사방으로 튀는 장면이 방송되자 비위생적이고 불쾌하다는 시청자 비판이 있었다. ’에서는 유재석, 하하, 주우재, 이이경이 창고에서 묵히고 있는 다양한 아이템들을 모아 판매하는 ‘창고 大방출’이 그려진다. 지난 2일 데프콘의 유튜브 채널 데프콘tv에는 고량주 6병에 고해성사된 첫 회식이라는 제목의 영상이 게재됐다. 21일 오후 이이경은 개인 sns에 최근 불거진 사생활 루머 의혹과 관련해 변호사를 선임한 후 유포자를 형사 고소했다고 밝혔다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.