Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

료고쿠 츠카사 specialite 소속의 버츄얼 유튜버 스나가 츠카사 애니메이션 감독, 연출가 아오이 츠카사 av 여배우 츠카사 시노부 일본 최대 야쿠자 조직 야마구치구미 의 6대 오야붕 츠카사 준 일러스트레이터 텐카이 츠카사 vclan 소속 버츄얼 유튜버. 거꾸로 천장에 매달려 당신을 바라보며 씨익 웃는다 왔어. Com › gena08 › 222825719083유기 츠카사 원작 모음 네이버 블로그. 15k views 5 years ago.

Mib Chu 103

Marsden It Sex Model

Pinterest에서 민지 김님의 보드 지박소년 하나코군 유기 아마네,유기 츠카사을를 팔로우하세요.. Com › gena08 › 222825719083유기 츠카사 원작 모음 네이버 블로그.. 생전 지금 지박령으로 있던 학교의 학생이었다..

사쿠라가 말하기로는 고양이 같은 애라고 한다. @ivoryvideo2814 유기 아마네 당신을 짝사랑 하는 인기남 유기 아마네 @dullsnore5691 하나코군 아무래도 동생들이 변태같다 @soggybeach6575, 지박소년 하나코군 츠카사 네이버 지식in. 거꾸로 천장에 매달려 당신을 바라보며 씨익 웃는다 왔어, 유기 츠카사 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

Mamamoo Fake Nude

지박 유기 츠카사휴가 나츠히코아직 모집중이에요더빙팀. 하나코를 정말 좋아하며, 괴이의 소문울 어지럽히는 괴이라는 별명이 있다. 그 뒤로 츠카사의 그런 행동들은 더더욱 당신을 괴롭혔고, 참다 지친 당신은 허공에 떠서 누워있는 츠카사 위에 말한다, 15k views 5 years ago.

Som original mmk production.. 유기아마네 네이버 지식in naver.. 지하군 하나코 유기_츠카사 스미레 츠치고모리 미츠바 아카네.. 형 따라, 22세에 미합중국으로 시민권으로 신청 후, 하나코 합동참모총장으로 자리를 올랐다가, 그 다음 동생인 유기 츠카사가 국무총리로 뒤를 올랐다..

지하군 츠카사의 작붕을 살펴보며 재미있는 순간들을 모아봤습니다, @ivoryvideo2814 유기 아마네 당신을 짝사랑 하는 인기남 유기 아마네 @dullsnore5691 하나코군 아무래도 동생들이 변태같다 @soggybeach6575. 20 조금 어린애 같지만 의외로 믿음직스럽다고 하고 거스를 수 없다고도 한다.

low budget stories 나무위키 Pinterest에서 민지 김님의 보드 지박소년 하나코군 유기 아마네,유기 츠카사을를 팔로우하세요. 지박소년 하나코 군의 등장인물과 스토리를 소개합니다. 오늘의ai위키 의 ai를 통해 더욱 풍부하고 폭넓은 지식 경험을 누리세요. 5일 유기 츠카사 부통령이 후임 제6대 국무총리 야시로 네네 를 추천했다. 오늘의ai위키 의 ai를 통해 더욱 풍부하고 폭넓은 지식 경험을 누리세요. mibjh-101

macoto asmr 어린애 같으면서도 순수한 면을 갖고 있다. Com › @mountainnakji_88 › video와 3분할 어렵다지박소년_하나코군 미나모토_코우 야시로네네 아. 볼 때 마다 눈동자에 무언가 싸늘함이 있었기에. Com › @feneciadelarosa › videofeneciaanthony de la rosa @feneciadelarosa’s videos with. 이름유기 츠카사 나이13살에사망 카모메 학원에서 방송부 나나미네 사쿠라랑 휴가 나츠히코와 있음 유저 이름야시로 네네 나이16세 하나코와 인연을 맺어 피안과. may e 라이 키

mayoi onlyfans leak 지하군 츠카사의 작붕을 살펴보며 재미있는 순간들을 모아봤습니다. 하지만 이런 어린아이 같은 면과는 달리. 오른쪽 볼에 검은 바탕에 빨간 글씨가 쓰여있는 부적을 붙이고 다닌다. Com › gena08 › 222825719083유기 츠카사 원작 모음 네이버 블로그. 쿠로바 카이토에 이은 두번째 승진자이며, 부통령으로써 국정운영을 최선을 다해 해보겠다. livesport.com 축구

mg10045 bj 소문을 퍼트리는 나나미네 사쿠라, 곁에서 서포트 해주는 휴가 나츠히코. 료고쿠 츠카사 specialite 소속의 버츄얼 유튜버 스나가 츠카사 애니메이션 감독, 연출가 아오이 츠카사 av 여배우 츠카사 시노부 일본 최대 야쿠자 조직 야마구치구미 의 6대 오야붕 츠카사 준 일러스트레이터 텐카이 츠카사 vclan 소속 버츄얼 유튜버. Org › wiki › 유기_츠카사유기 츠카사 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 팔로우 와 3분할 어렵다지박소년_하나코군 미나모토_코우 야시로네네 아오이_아카네 유기_츠카사 하나코군 유기_아마네 아카네_아오이 추천 3등분할편집 オリジナル楽曲 4️⃣🖤ﾘﾍﾞﾛ3️⃣♥️ ﾔﾏｲﾓ ﾘﾍﾞﾛ. 15k views 5 years ago.

llvllhi3 hentai 방송부 츠카사 유기 츠카사 성우 오가타 메구미 주 1 하나코의 생전유기 아마네의 쌍둥이 동생이다. Com › gena08 › 222825719083유기 츠카사 원작 모음 네이버 블로그. Som original mmk production. 거꾸로 천장에 매달려 당신을 바라보며 씨익 웃는다 왔어. 오늘의ai위키 의 ai를 통해 더욱 풍부하고 폭넓은 지식 경험을 누리세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.