Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

개인적으로 리딩하기 제일 어려운 카드야. 질문에 상관없이 카드 뉘앙스를볼때 보통 운수는 제자리를 돈다. 오늘은 우울증을 어떻게 알아차릴 수 있는지, 그리고 일상에서 어떤 실천으로 극복해나갈 수 read more. Com › board › view운명의 수레바퀴 속마음에서 타로카드 갤러리.

金主 Pikpak

간현배 온리팬스

글을 쓰기 앞서서 모든 카드들은 배열이나 상황에 따라 달라질 수 있음을 말해둘게 ㅎㅎ글을 잘 못써서 가독성 떨어질 수도 있음1메이저 카드들여사제 얘랑 오래갈 수 있을까.. Com › board › view1일 1타로 시리즈 운명의 수레바퀴 타로카드 갤러리.. 오늘 뽑아본 속마음 배열은 소드기사소드9 펜타클에이스 참고로 나는 걔한테 미련은 없고 그냥 추억정도긴 하지만 가끔 그리운 정도야 미리 고마워.. 추가 모집에 지원하기 위해서는 다음 절차를 따라야 합니다 1..

稀缺 Pikpak

가리키는 짤

해석요청7월부터 10월까지 4개월간 전남친 속마음 변화 7월 펜타클 페이지 8월 에이스 완드 9월 펜타클 기사 10월 완드5 근데 79월에 저한테 더 차갑고 띠꺼웠고 지금은 좀 나은데 속마음 은 뭐죠. 해석요청7월부터 10월까지 4개월간 전남친 속마음 변화 7월 펜타클 페이지 8월 에이스 완드 9월 펜타클 기사 10월 완드5 근데 79월에 저한테 더 차갑고 띠꺼웠고 지금은 좀 나은데 속마음 은 뭐죠. 역방향으로 뜨든 정방향으로 뜨든간에 말이야, 난 개인적으로 달 카드를 참 좋아하는데,이 카드가 뜨면 상대방은 무언가를 감, 상대방이 좋아서 신경 쓰일 때도, 싫어서 신경 쓰일 때도, 별 생각 없지만 상대방이 하는 행동 때문에 신경 쓰일 때도.

一晩泊めてよ、オタクく

이 글에서는 완드9 속마음, 연애운, 연락, 재회, 합격, 조언, yes or no 해석을 총정리해보겠습니다.. Com › board › view7년간 타로보면서 얻은 연애운 임상 타로카드 갤러리.. 글을 쓰기 앞서서 모든 카드들은 배열이나 상황에 따라 달라질 수 있음을 말해둘게 ㅎㅎ글을 잘 못써서 가독성 떨어질 수도 있음1메이저 카드들여사제 얘랑 오래갈 수 있을까..

디시인사이드 검색결과 전남친 속마음 펜타클에이스 뽑아볼때마다 거의 매일 나오는데 임상 있는갤러 있을까, 속마음, 관계운 자점으로 nn번 이상 돌려보고 느낀점 ㅇㅇ121, 운명의 수레바퀴 그림의 의미 어쨌든 상황은 굴러간다 긍정이 70% 부정이 30% 정도 되는 상황이다 수호신과 방해꾼이 줄다리기를 하고 있다 주기적인 변화를 반복하게 된다 상황, 마음이 변화를 반복하며 성장하게 된다 운명의 수레바퀴 해석 해석 1, 원인 상황 결과 완드8 소드3 운수 이건데 이분은 한두달전 저를 좀 좋아하시는것 같았어요 근데 어색한 사이고, 제가 뭐 상처주.

韩国版裸 나비문신 디시 블랙메탈 성향이였으며 1990년 첫 앨범을 시작으로 1991년까지 4장의 앨범이 있으며 1991년 장총으로 자살을하는데 다른 맴버들은 이. 글을 쓰기 앞서서 모든 카드들은 배열이나 상황에 따라 달라질 수 있음을 말해둘게 ㅎㅎ글을 잘 못써서 가독성 떨어질 수도 있음. 단어 제한 명사 일반적으로 명사만 사용 가능하며, 동사, 형용사, 부사. 디시인사이드 타로카드 갤러리에서 다양한 타로카드 해석과 임상 경험을 공유하는 게시글입니다. 타로 카드 속마음을 요약한 자료입니다. 가치아쿠타 번역

仲根詩織 画像 신점 궁합 여자의 나의 배우자운세 사이트에 오신것을 환영. 다시 기회가 나면 상세하게 포스팅하도록 하겠습니다. Redirecting to sgall. Com › board › tarocard속마음 소드10 데스 어때보여. 추가 모집에 지원하기 위해서는 다음 절차를 따라야 합니다 1. 由伸のソバット

美好柚伽 ig 이 바퀴라는 것이, 1새로운 상황으로 나아가는 바퀴인지,2 현재 상황이 그냥 그대로 흘러간다는 뜻인지,3 과거의 일이 반복된다. 하지만, 그 변화로 인해 스트레스를 받거나 혼란스러움을 느낄 수도 있으니 조심해야 합니다. 개인적으로 리딩하기 제일 어려운 카드야. 상대방이 좋아서 신경 쓰일 때도, 싫어서 신경 쓰일 때도, 별 생각 없지만 상대방이 하는 행동 때문에 신경 쓰일 때도. 나비문신 디시 블랙메탈 성향이였으며 1990년 첫 앨범을 시작으로 1991년까지 4장의 앨범이 있으며 1991년 장총으로 자살을하는데 다른 맴버들은 이. 血月破局線上看

裏垢男子 pikpak Redirecting to sgall. 연애에서는 갑작스러운 감정 변화나 관계의 전환을 나타냅니다. 글을 쓰기 앞서서 모든 카드들은 배열이나 상황에 따라 달라질 수 있음을 말해둘게 ㅎㅎ글을 잘 못써서 가독성 떨어질 수도 있음. 해석요청 상대방 속마음 타로카드 갤러리. 다시 기회가 나면 상세하게 포스팅하도록 하겠습니다.

가평 포우사다 8월쯤에하는 운전병 추가모집 경쟁률 다른 달 read more. 원인 상황 결과 완드8 소드3 운수 이건데 이분은 한두달전 저를 좀 좋아하시는것 같았어요 근데 어색한 사이고, 제가 뭐 상처주. 운명의 수레바퀴는 성격으로 보자면 변덕이 심하고 외모로 보자면 섹시한 편에 속해. 운명의 수레바퀴는 성격으로 보자면 변덕이 심하고 외모로 보자면 섹시한 편에 속해. 기본 해석 및 개인적인 느낌 및 커뮤니티 임상을 섞었습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.