21k followers, 504 following, 780 posts 요니 yoni @yoni_baek on instagram model & creator 경력 14년차 프리랜서 모델 촬영&협찬 문의 dm💌.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

마침내 빅리그에 선 요니 치리노스는 루키로써 무실점의 데뷔전을 치루었지만 결국 피로누적이 팔뚝 부상으로 이어져 부상자 명단에 오르면서 불펜을 오가며 부진과 호투, 등락을 반복하는 다소 불안한 빅리그 데뷔 시즌을 보내게 됩니다. 서울반점보다 훨씬 맛있었어유 ㅋㅋ 3. Osen길준영 기자 프로야구 lg 트윈스가 새 외국인투수 요니 치리노스 31를 영입했다. 21k followers, 504 following, 780 posts 요니 yoni @yoni_baek on instagram model & creator 경력 14년차 프리랜서 모델 촬영&협찬 문의 dm💌.

작아진 요니 청바지 버리기 아까워 반바지로 만들고 하트.

21k followers, 504 following, 780 posts 요니 yoni @yoni_baek on instagram model & creator 경력 14년차 프리랜서 모델 촬영&협찬 문의 dm💌, 우울증의 묘사와 표현력이 매우 뛰어난 것이 특징이다, Team 고미첼 이세계 아이돌 isegye idol ver 튜링 러브 チューリングラブ cover 불러보았다 ₊˚ପ⊹. 패션디자이너 요니p는 지난 6일 자신의 인스타그램에 방시혁과 함께 찍은 사진을 올려놨다, 임티도하고 핸드메이드도 하고 릴스도 했어요릴스는 내일 업로드 할예정, Com › tndls8507 › 223265934326네이버 블로그.

Hours Ago Lg 요니 치리노스는 2년 연속 통합우승에 힘을 보태겠다는 힘찬 각오를 밝혔다.

크리스마스 지나고 본 광복로 트리 5. 크리스마스 지나고 본 광복로 트리 5, Jpgimg 44년전이누야샤 후속작 근황img 104년전야샤히메 이 애니 팬서비스가 굉장하다 20201020년10월21일 432.

🫦요니yoni🫦 @yoni_baek 님의 최신 동영상을 시청하세요. Team 고미첼 이세계 아이돌 isegye idol ver 튜링 러브 チューリングラブ cover 불러보았다 ₊˚ପ⊹. 요니근황♡ 요니 꼬모 조이의 공간 2015, 봉골레를 샤브육수로 만들었다는 것부터 반신.

Likes, 3 comments 요니요니 @luv_yonii on instagram 생존신고 잘살고있음🌝 겨울사진 올리고 봄사진 올리니까 다음은 여.. 샵이로 창원왁싱 창원슈가링 창원속눈썹펌 브라질리언..

다행히 이어진 7회 공격에서 팀 타선이 역전에 성공하며 패전을 벗어났다, 디자이너 요니 p가 하이브 방시혁 의장의 최근 근황을 전했다. 삼성전자 첫 스마트 반지, 49만9400원에 출시 초기 미국중국 등에서 ‘완판’ 열풍 그러나 지금은 판매량 바닥후속 모델도 감감무소식.

2,456 Followers, 437 Following, 264 Posts 요니 @yoni____i On Instagram 찰싹모야좌 💟 일상의 소소하고 사랑스러운 모든 것을 담으려 해요 ˃̵͈̑ᴗ˂̵͈̑.

Jpg now img 34년전반요 야샤히메 아니, 왜 거기에서 당신이 나와, Jpg now img 44년전이누야샤 후속작 근황img 104년전야샤히메 이 애니 팬서비스가 굉장하다 20201020년10월21일 952. 치리노스는 25일부터 미국 애리조나에서 진행 중인 2026시즌 1차 스프링캠프에 참가하고 있다.

av fit av Lg는 27일 외국인선수 요니 치리노스와 총액 100만 달러 계약금 20만 달러, 연봉, 80만 달러에 입단 계약을 합의했다라고 발표했다. 입사 초반에 어리바리 시절사실 지금듀ㅎ 잘 챙겨주시고, 옆 자리에서 업무도 많이 알려주셨었는데. 달콤 알렉산더 테크닉 & 명상 전체보기 1,085개의 글 목록열기. Tiktok 틱톡 의 🫦요니yoni🫦 @yoni_baek 좋아요 2187개. 우울증의 묘사와 표현력이 매우 뛰어난 것이 특징이다. asmr 아카

asian angel 7415 다행히 이어진 7회 공격에서 팀 타선이 역전에 성공하며 패전을 벗어났다. Jpgimg 44년전이누야샤 후속작 근황img 104년전야샤히메 이 애니 팬서비스가 굉장하다 20201020년10월21일 432. Likes, 10 comments jiyooooooni on aug 일주일 근황 1. Korean model yoni🦋 live 월금 monfri 9pm kst 공휴일은 랜덤🤍. 하지만 나에겐 영원한 밥 잘 사주는 시혁 오빠라는 메시지를 덧붙였다. animated sotwe

anfdksrud96 fantrie Com › tndls8507 › 223265934326네이버 블로그. Osen길준영 기자 프로야구 lg 트윈스가 새 외국인투수 요니 치리노스 31를 영입했다. Likes, 2 comments seoul_economic on j 50만원짜리 ‘일회용 반지’. 삼성전자 첫 스마트 반지, 49만9400원에 출시 초기 미국중국 등에서 ‘완판’ 열풍 그러나 지금은 판매량 바닥후속 모델도 감감무소식. Lol 바텀듀오 하하 요니 정준하하하 35k views4 years ago. av19 pding

arinbeauty0812 porn 롤 정준하 인생 챔 찾았습니다 5대1도 상대하는 준하이머딩거 이게 원딜이다. 120 likes, 6 comments s_m1mi on aug 오랜만에 미요니 근황癩 하루에 폰 세번은 떨구는듯 이제 셀카는 못. Jpg now img 34년전반요 야샤히메 아니, 왜 거기에서 당신이 나와. Lg는 27일 외국인선수 요니 치리노스와 총액 100만 달러 계약금 20만 달러, 연봉, 80만 달러에 입단 계약을 합의했다라고 발표했다. Hours ago lg 요니 치리노스는 2년 연속 통합우승에 힘을 보태겠다는 힘찬 각오를 밝혔다.

altspm_ Likes, 5 comments jiyooooooni on septem 일주일 근황 1. 다행히 이어진 7회 공격에서 팀 타선이 역전에 성공하며 패전을 벗어났다. Korean model yoni🦋 live 월금 monfri 9pm kst 공휴일은 랜덤🤍. 120 likes, 6 comments s_m1mi on aug 오랜만에 미요니 근황癩 하루에 폰 세번은 떨구는듯 이제 셀카는 못. 이후 국내활동을 활발히 이어갔으며, 서울패션위크 에서 푸시버튼, 지춘희, 스티브j &요니p, 럭키슈에뜨, 박춘무, 계한희 등의 디자이너 쇼에 올랐다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.