US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 3, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 3, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 3, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 3, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 3, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 3, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 3, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 3, 2026.
재미있게 보셨다면 좋아요,팔로우,댓글 부탁드립니다. 네이버 웹툰 외모지상주의와 박태준 만화회사의 모든 만화들,그리고 기타 만화애니 및 전반적인 서브컬쳐에 대해 이야기하는 갤러리 매니저 유령도쿄 intend9085 부매니저 귀뽀마 m7396 최윤돌 yundoryu 빙하 kiss8318 아리우스2 arius06 선버지 those250. 교육의 필요에 따라 학교의 수업일수 범위 내에서, read more. 외지주ts tiktok 틱톡 에서 외지주ts에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요.
Days ago 네이버 금요웹툰 외모지상주의와 기타 박태준 만화회사의 모든 작품들,그리고 네이버 웹툰 전반에 대해 주로 이야기하는 갤러리매주 목요일 오후 10시 51분에 외모지상주의 미리보기 업로드현재 일해회 잡기 에피소드 연재 중. Com › @user2174387110202 › video외모지상주의와 박태준 유니버스 갤러리 탐방 tiktok. Capcut lookism 외모지상주의 외지주 박태준유니버스갤러리 박유갤 추천. 외모지상주의의 압도적인 인기와 개성 넘치는 캐릭터, 특유의 연출의 감수성, 그리고 외갤 특유의 합성 문화 등으로 인하여 만화 관련 갤러리 중 압도적으로 밈이 많이 생산되는 편이다.교육의 필요에 따라 학교의 수업일수 범위 내에서, read more.. Com › @yugallr_1 › video지공섭 외모지상주의 외지주 박태준유니버스 박태준유니버스갤러.. Capcut lookism 외모지상주의 외지주 박태준유니버스갤러리 박유갤 추천..
21 213233 조회 12641 추천 258 댓글 17, 네이버 웹툰 외모지상주의와 박태준 만화회사의 모든 만화들,그리고 기타 만화애니 및 전반적인 서브컬쳐에 대해 이야기하는 갤러리 매니저 유령도쿄 intend9085 부매니저 귀뽀마 m7396 최윤돌 yundoryu 빙하 kiss8318 아리우스2 arius06 선버지 those250, 행사명 2026년 2월말 전임교원 정년퇴임식. Com › mgallery › board외지주 역대급 joat 모음집 1탄 외모지상주의 마이너 갤러리. 외모지상주의 갤러리 명예의전당 외지주 역대급 joat 모음집 1탄 ㅇㅇ223.
외모지상주의 갤러리를 보는 방법과 추천 콘텐츠를 통해 새로운 즐길 거리를 찾아보세요. 박태준유니버스갤러리 외모지상주의갤러리, Atdonatenurgigi비즈니스 문의각종제보소통건의사항nurgigi@naver.
재미있게 보셨다면 좋아요,팔로우,댓글 부탁드립니다.. 좋아요 48개,외빠 @user202 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 박태준 유니버스 갤러리에 대해 알아보세요.. 김기명의 등장 박태준유니버스갤러리 박유갤 유갤 유니버스갤러리 유니버스 외모지상주의마이너갤러리 외갤러 외모지상주의 외지주갤러리 추천 2세대 김기명 김갑룡아들 1세대 서울의왕 김기태 lookismedit lookismmanhwa looks look lookismwebtoon lookism.. 외모지상주의 갤러리 명예의전당 외지주 역대급 joat 모음집 1탄 ㅇㅇ223..
03 2213 보리수 여기서 10년 뒤 외지주 속도의 경지 vs 사랑의 경지가 나온거노ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 2022. Com › mgallery › board외지주 최신 티어표 외모지상주의 마이너 갤러리. 장 소 제11호관 복지회관 208호 소극장 2. 박태준 유니버스 갤러리에서 외모지상주의에 대한 이야기와 추천을 다룹니다. 외모지상주의 갤러리를 보는 방법과 추천 콘텐츠를 통해 새로운 즐길 거리를 찾아보세요.
외모지상주의 마이너 갤러리 r440 판. 외모지상주의에 대해 이야기하고 다양한 의견을 나누는 디시인사이드 갤러리입니다, 넥슨과 크래프톤 2사의 연간 영업이익 합계는 약 2조6236억원으로 압도적인 수익성을 보인 반면 나머지 경쟁사들은 흑자 폭이 미미하거나 적자로 전환해 read more. 외모지상주의의 압도적인 인기와 개성 넘치는 캐릭터, 특유의 연출의 감수성, 그리고 외갤 특유의 합성 문화 등으로 인하여 만화 관련 갤러리 중 압도적으로 밈이 많이 생산되는 편이다. Com › @yugallr_1 › video거리의 주인 lookism manhwa webtoon 外見地上主義 typ tiktok.
좋아요 48개,외빠 @user202 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 박태준 유니버스 갤러리에 대해 알아보세요. 디시인갤러리 보는 법, 초미니 디카 갤러리 보는법, 토이카메라 갤러리 보는. 넥슨과 크래프톤 2사의 연간 영업이익 합계는 약 2조6236억원으로 압도적인 수익성을 보인 반면 나머지 경쟁사들은 흑자 폭이 미미하거나 적자로 전환해 read more, Com › @caklasone78 › videocaklasone78 @caklasone78’s videos with suara asli.
민한나 nude 외모지상주의 마이너 갤러리는 여러분들의 창작 활동에 대해 적극적으로 지원 및 응원하기 위해, 뉴비들에게 과거의 외갤 명작들을 알려주기 위해, 창작자분들의 업적을 기리기 위해서 명예의 전당 시스템을 운영하고 있습니다. 네이버 웹툰 외모지상주의와 박태준 만화회사의 모든 만화들,그리고 기타 만화애니 및 전반적인 서브컬쳐에 대해 이야기하는 갤러리 매니저 유령도쿄 intend9085 부매니저 귀뽀마 m7396 최윤돌 yundoryu 빙하 kiss8318 아리우스2 arius06 선버지 those250. Com › @yugallr_1 › video지공섭 외모지상주의 외지주 박태준유니버스 박태준유니버스갤러. 한밭대학교 통합학사정보시스템 국제학생증발급 취업정보 한밭갤러리 학사종합안내 장학제도 온라인학사상담 학생상담센터. 외모지상주의와 관련된 흥미로운 콘텐츠를 소개합니다. 뮌헨 10번
미트볼뉴나 Atdonatenurgigi비즈니스 문의각종제보소통건의사항nurgigi@naver. 외모지상주의와 관련된 흥미로운 콘텐츠를 소개합니다. 외모지상주의의 압도적인 인기와 개성 넘치는 캐릭터, 특유의 연출의 감수성, 그리고 외갤 특유의 합성 문화 등으로 인하여 만화 관련 갤러리 중 압도적으로 밈이 많이 생산되는 편이다. 김기명의 등장 박태준유니버스갤러리 박유갤 유갤 유니버스갤러리 유니버스 외모지상주의마이너갤러리 외갤러 외모지상주의 외지주갤러리 추천 2세대 김기명 김갑룡아들 1세대 서울의왕 김기태 lookismedit lookismmanhwa looks look lookismwebtoon lookism. Explore morespiritual viraltiktok prayers faith holyspirit gospel when you eat in your dream, do this to destroy the evil food. 무한구닝
미츠도우에 박태준 유니버스 갤러리에서 외모지상주의에 대한 이야기와 추천을 다룹니다. 외지주ts tiktok 틱톡 에서 외지주ts에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요. 외모지상주의 갤러리 명예의전당 외지주 역대급 joat 모음집 1탄 ㅇㅇ223. 박태준유니버스갤러리 외모지상주의갤러리. Explore morespiritual viraltiktok prayers faith holyspirit gospel when you eat in your dream, do this to destroy the evil food. 미연 디시
무희 야짤 외모지상주의 갤러리를 보는 방법과 추천 콘텐츠를 통해 새로운 즐길 거리를 찾아보세요. 디시인갤러리 보는 법, 초미니 디카 갤러리 보는법, 토이카메라 갤러리 보는. 박태준 유니버스 갤러리에서 외모지상주의에 대한 이야기와 추천을 다룹니다. 디시인갤러리 보는 법, 초미니 디카 갤러리 보는법, 토이카메라 갤러리 보는. 외모지상주의의 압도적인 인기와 개성 넘치는 캐릭터, 특유의 연출의 감수성, 그리고 외갤 특유의 합성 문화 등으로 인하여 만화 관련 갤러리 중 압도적으로 밈이 많이 생산되는 편이다.
무잔 히토미 Capcut lookism 외모지상주의 외지주 박태준유니버스갤러리 박유갤 추천. 외모지상주의와 관련된 흥미로운 콘텐츠를 소개합니다. Com › @caklasone78 › videocaklasone78 @caklasone78’s videos with suara asli. 행사명 2026년 2월말 전임교원 정년퇴임식. Days ago 네이버 금요웹툰 외모지상주의와 기타 박태준 만화회사의 모든 작품들,그리고 네이버 웹툰 전반에 대해 주로 이야기하는 갤러리매주 목요일 오후 10시 51분에 외모지상주의 미리보기 업로드현재 일해회 잡기 에피소드 연재 중.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 3, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 3, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 3, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 3, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
, Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.