Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

특집 방송 프로듀서가 주당이었고 가요제 끝나고 현장에서 엄청난 술판이 벌어졌다며 결국 pd가 모든 것을 솔직히 얘기하고 극비리에 도와달라고 말하더라고 당시를 회상했다. 한 방송사에서 아나운서로 활동하던 a씨가 여성과 성관계한 영상을 캡처해 지인들에게 불법 유포한 혐의로 최근 검찰에 넘겨졌다. Com › news › articleview왕영은, 1981년 ‘테이프 도난’ 최악의 방송사고 고백 미디어제주. 한국야동핵고전 아나운서 왕영은 비디오 유출사건 온리팬스유출 트위터야동 일본야동 한국야동 서양야동 야동코리아 bj벗방 중국야동 야스 찜하기 오류신고.

왕영은 사진sbs `강심장` 방송인 왕영은이 30년간 숨겨져 있었던 충격적인 방송사고의 전말을 공개했다.. 26일 sbs 방송연예 프로그램 강심장에서 왕영은은 지난 1981년 방송된 kbs라디오 사랑의 듀엣 가요제의 녹음 테이프 도둑.. 의결권없는 보통주 실효성 있나다양한 자금조달 위해 도입..

Pikpak Sexfriend

中 아나운서 왕예난, 섹스비디오 유출범인은 前 남친. 26일 sbs 방송연예 프로그램 강심장에서 왕영은은 지난 1981년 방송된 kbs라디오. 특집 방송 프로듀서가 주당이었고 가요제 끝나고 현장에서 엄청난 술판이 벌어졌다며 결국 pd가 모든 것을 솔직히 얘기하고 극비리에 도와달라고 말하더라고 당시를 회상했다.

특집 방송 프로듀서가 주당이었고 가요제 끝나고 현장에서 엄청난 술판이 벌어졌다며 결국 pd가 모든 것을 솔직히 얘기하고 극비리에 도와달라고 말하더라고 당시를 회상했다. 가요제 촬영 녹화 테이프가 자고 일어나니 모두 사라졌단다. 라디오에 출연한 양원경이 닭뼈를 먹이면 개 죽이는 게 직빵이라느니 군대에. 이는 지난해 8월 초대형 모바일 라이브쇼 론칭 read more. 방송사 전 아나운서, 성관계 영상 캡처본 유출 검찰 송치. 라디오에 출연한 양원경이 닭뼈를 먹이면 개 죽이는 게 직빵이라느니 군대에.

Pikpak 便器

Com › search › 왕영은+아나운서+유출왕영은 아나운서 유출 porn videos xhamster. Kr › news › read왕영은, 30년간 비밀에 부쳐진 `방송사고` 공개. 1981년 방송을 시작한 뽀뽀뽀의 첫 진행자이자 초대 뽀미언니는 왕영은입니다, 왕영은, 30년간 비밀로 감춰온 희대의 방송사고 깜짝 고백. Com › search › 왕영은+아나운서+유출왕영은 아나운서 유출 porn videos xhamster.

가요제 촬영 녹화 테이프가 자고 일어나니 모두 사라졌단다. 왕영은은 26일 방송된 sbs `강심장`에 출연해 `그 방송은 전설이 됐다`는 제목으로 얘기를 시작했다. Com › news › articleview왕영은, 1981년 ‘테이프 도난’ 최악의 방송사고 고백 미디어제주. 26일 sbs 방송연예 프로그램 강심장에서 왕영은은 지난 1981년 방송된 kbs라디오 사랑의 듀엣 가요제의 녹음 테이프 도둑. 26일 sbs 방송연예 프로그램 강심장에서 왕영은은 지난 1981년 방송된 kbs라디오.

Pikpak Yuzu

브리핑 신세계푸드이마트 베이커리 케이크 판매량 35% 증가.. 왕영은사진sbs `강심장` 방송인 왕영은이 30년간 숨겨져 있었던 충격적인 방송사고의 전말을 공개했다.. 회사원부터 3번의 결혼까지역대 뽀미 언니들의 최근 근황.. 몇 달 전 헤어진 남자친구가 헤어진데 앙심을 품고 유출한 것으로 알려진 문제의 영상에는 왕예난 아나운서가 옷을 벗고 채팅을 하는 장면을 비롯, 젊은..

이불밖은 위험해 전자파 걱정 없는 이메텍 전기요로 안전한. 한 방송사에서 아나운서로 활동하던 a씨가 여성과 성관계한 영상을 캡처해 지인들에게 불법 유포한 혐의로 최근 검찰에 넘겨졌다. 이는 지난해 8월 초대형 모바일 라이브쇼 론칭 read more, 라디오에 출연한 양원경이 닭뼈를 먹이면 개 죽이는 게 직빵이라느니 군대에. 한편, 이날 ‘강심장’에는 최악 방송사고를 고백한 왕영은 외에도 주영훈, 이병준, 현영, 정용화, 이정신, 이제니, 손은서 등이 출연해 입담을 과시했다.

pikpak zoo 왕영은, 원미경, 이보희, 강문영 등 황신혜는 나중에 박철언과 관련. 왕영은 사진sbs `강심장` 방송인 왕영은이 30년간 숨겨져 있었던 충격적인 방송사고의 전말을 공개했다. 왕영은은 1983년 배철수의 감전사고 당시 mc로 현장에. 뽀미 언니 방송인 왕영은 씨 팬카페 가입자 16만명 활용 방송 시작한지 5년만에 달성 회당 43억원씩 팔며 최단기록 상품 정해지면 한달 써보고. 26일 sbs 방송연예 프로그램 강심장에서 왕영은은 지난 1981년 방송된 kbs라디오 사랑의 듀엣 가요제의 녹음 테이프 도둑. qvc tv clearance

pixaiai 몇 달 전 헤어진 남자친구가 헤어진데 앙심을 품고 유출한 것으로 알려진 문제의 영상에는 왕예난 아나운서가 옷을 벗고 채팅을 하는 장면을 비롯, 젊은. 왕영은은 이날 방송에서 1983년 일어난 배철수 감전. 왕영은은 26일 방송된 sbs `강심장`에 출연해 `그 방송은 전설이 됐다`는 제목으로 얘기를 시작했다. 왕영은 최악 방송사고 83년 가요제 끝나고 뒤풀이 뒤, 녹화. 이메텍 전기요는 cj오쇼핑 최화정쇼, gs홈쇼핑 왕영은의 톡톡톡 방송에서 높은 판매를 올리기도 했다. pikpak 陸上

pred824 예를 들어 대주주 지분이 적어 유상증자를 하기 read more. 왕영은, 1981년 테이프 도난 최악의 방송사고 고백. 브리핑 신세계푸드이마트 베이커리 케이크 판매량 35% 증가. 브리핑 신세계푸드이마트 베이커리 케이크 판매량 35% 증가. 왕영은, 30년간 비밀로 감춰온 희대의 방송사고 깜짝 고백. ppv 품번

red52 디시 1978년 tbc 해변가요제에서 대상을 수상하며. 이 방송은 당시 많은 관심을 받았으며, 왕영은 역시 스타로서 큰 주목을 받았다. Bj방송 한국야동, bj,방송실제 활동중인 아이돌 꼬셔서 따먹기 일반인 한국야동핵고전 아나운서 왕영은 비디오 유출사건 bj방송 한국야동, bj,방송지금은 유부녀가 된 미달이 19금 방송+베드신 합본 bj방송. Kr › wangyoungeunvideo왕영은 비디오 사건, 방송 역사에 남을 충격적 순간. 브리치포럼 사용자 32만 명 정보 유출.

pikpak 無修正 1981년, 당시 왕영은은 한 라디오 가요제에서 중요한 방송을 진행. 왕영은은 1983년 배철수의 감전사고 당시 mc로 현장에. 1대 뽀미언니 왕영은이 방송 최초로 30년간 감춰왔던 방송 사고를 고백한다. 스포츠계에서 영구 제명을 당하면 read more. 한국야동핵고전 아나운서 왕영은 비디오 유출사건 온리팬스유출 트위터야동 일본야동 한국야동 서양야동 야동코리아 bj벗방 중국야동 야스 찜하기 오류신고.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.