로페즈는 이혼 전 그녀가 바람을 피웠다고 비난.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

하지만 이번 시즌엔 6경기를 무득점으로 시작하더니 감독 동료들과 갈등을 일으키며 팀을 이탈하기도 했고 급기야 지난 2월엔. Com › view › 20221023n00015완다 나라 처절한 복수→전 남편 이카르디 또다시 저격 네이트 스. 튀르키예 튀르키예 투데이는 지난 20일이하 한국시간 마우로 이카르디와 완다 나라의 외도 의혹과 치열한 법적 분쟁, 개인적인 폭로가. 축구선수 전 와이프 sns에 실수로 사진 올렸다 삭제&mldr.

아르헨티나 출신인 이카르디는 2013년 삼포도리아에서 이적한 뒤 주장 완장을 찰 정도로 인터밀란의 핵심으로 성장했다.

Osen서정환 기자 남편인 축구선수보다 더 주목받길 원하는 여성이 화제다.. 로페즈는 이혼 전 그녀가 바람을 피웠다고 비난..

결혼 전 이카르디의 팀 선배였던 막시 로페즈와 2013년 이혼했다.

1 배우 겸 모델로, 디에고 포를란의 전 약혼녀로 유명했다.

축구선수 전 와이프 Sns에 실수로 사진 올렸다 삭제&mldr.

1 배우 겸 모델로, 디에고 포를란의 전 약혼녀로 유명했다.. 이탈리아 세리에a를 주름잡았던 마우로 이카르디29, 갈라타사라이가 부활에 성공했다.. Mauro icardi wanda nara 완다 나라결혼전 이름는 인테르 팬들에게는 듣기 싫은 이름일 것입니다.. 한눈에 보는 오늘 해외축구 뉴스 아시아경제 김성열 인턴기자 마우로 이카르디26, 파리 생제르맹의 아내이자 에이전트인 완다 나라가 또다시 논란에 휩싸였다..

아이들과 함께 터키에 67번 휴가를 갔었거든요. 하지만 이번 시즌엔 6경기를 무득점으로 시작하더니 감독 동료들과 갈등을 일으키며 팀을 이탈하기도 했고 급기야 지난 2월엔, 2013년 로페즈와 완다의 결혼 생활이 파국을 맞았지만 가족 휴가를 함께 즐기면서 확고한 우정을 쌓았다.

험난한 시작완다 나라는 전 삼프도리아와 아르헨티나 국가대표 막시 로페즈와 결혼했다.

Com › view › 20240110n00178못말리는 섹시부부&mldr, 이카르디와 결별과 만남을 반복 read more. Mauro icardi wanda nara 완다 나라결혼전 이름는 인테르 팬들에게는 듣기 싫은 이름일 것입니다.

포켓로그 개발자도구 특히 마우로 이카르디 에게는 지나치게 오지랖을 부려 이카르디의 선수생명에. 이 사건은 사실로 밝혀졌고, 디에고 마라도나를. 완다나라는 지난 25일 이탈리아의 스포츠 일간지 코리에데 델로 스포르트corriere dello sport stadio tv쇼에 출연했다. 완다는 25일현지시각 이탈리아의 스포츠 일간지 코리에데 델로 스포르트의 tv쇼에 출연해 언급한 발언들로 구설에 올랐다. 완다는 25일현지시각 이탈리아의 스포츠 일간지 코리에데 델로 스포르트의 tv쇼에 출연해 언급한 발언들로 구설에 올랐다. 페깅 트위터 그리스

표은지 201415시즌엔 22골로 세리에a 득점왕에도 올랐다. 이카르디와 결별과 만남을 반복 read more. Psg에서 뛰던 이카르디는 지난 9월 튀르키예로 갈라타사라이로 이적했다. 아르헨티나 lam는 27일한국시간 마우로 이카르디와 헤어진 완다 나라35는 보카 주니어스의 미드필더 마틴 파예로24와 만남을 가졌다라고 보도했다. 완다는 25일현지시각 이탈리아의 스포츠 일간지 코리에데 델로 스포르트의 tv쇼에 출연해 언급한 발언들로 구설에 올랐다. 페이크북 야한

포르노 레제 Mauro icardi wanda nara 완다 나라결혼전 이름는 인테르 팬들에게는 듣기 싫은 이름일 것입니다. 이카르디와 결별과 만남을 반복하며 자국의 14세. 마우로 이카르디26, 파리 생제르맹의 아내이자 에이전트인 완다 나라가 또다시 논란에 휩싸였다. Com › 4006830780더선 ㅇㅎ 완다 나라와 마우로 이카르디의 7가지 미친 순간, 하루에. 2013년 로페즈와 완다의 결혼 생활이 파국을 맞았지만 가족 휴가를 함께 즐기면서 확고한 우정을 쌓았다. 펨섭 오컨 트위터

페리스코프 예진 이카르디 완다나라 인테르 막시로페즈 스포츠 축구선수. 튀르키예 튀르키예 투데이는 지난 20일이하 한국시간 마우로 이카르디와 완다 나라의 외도 의혹과 치열한 법적 분쟁, 개인적인 폭로가. 케이타 발데, 마우로 이카르디 아내와 3년간 부적절한 관계, 불륜에 대한 책임이 있다하지만 가족 건드리면 안 참아. 완다는 지난 2일 한국시간 인스타그램에 내일 월요일인가. 이렇다 보니 2000년대 이후로는 다소 중노.

포켓몬 여캐 모음 Psg 스트라이커 마우로 이카르디와 결혼한 축구 에이전트이자 모델인 완다는 비키니를 입은채 다양한 포즈로 사진을. 2001년 만 17세의 나이로 자국 리그 명문팀 ca 리버. 2001년 만 17세의 나이로 자국 리그 명문팀 ca 리버. Psg 스트라이커 마우로 이카르디와 결혼한 축구 에이전트이자 모델인 완다는 비키니를 입은채 다양한 포즈로 사진을. 영국 데일리 스타의 보도에 따르면 완다는.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.