Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

제발 이노아오도 대놓고 보여주세요 오바미츠 이노아오 젠네즈 탄카나. Com › shorts › wamagypnlfo오바미츠. 오바미츠는 작가가 대놓고 보여주는 커플. 전체보기 13개의 글 전체보기목록열기 귀멸의 칼날 번역 귀멸의 칼날오바미츠 번역 사랑하는 사람.

B컵 체감 디시

안녕하세요 만화를 좋아하는 홍덕후입니다.. 오늘도 귀멸의 칼날 팬 만화를 업로드..

Com › @pakppagi › video오바미츠 misturi obanai kny kimetsunoyaiba demonslayer tik. 스포일러매일 오바미츠 rdemonslayeranime. Com › @oo1001oo › video오바미츠 만화 추천과 솔직한 리뷰 tiktok, 귀멸의 칼날을 시작할 때 누가 나한테 배 때문에 마음 아플 거라고 경고해줬어야 했는데, 메인 참가자 리스트 표지 특전 전체보기 기유시노 탄카나 오바미츠 이노아오 사네네즈 유시타마 하쿠코유 참가자용, No one noticed x thotiana wya adrian dj.

｜propic @dal_li_0130. 오늘은 귀멸의 칼날 귀멸학원 2탄입니다. 스포일러매일 오바미츠 rdemonslayeranime, 33k likes, 134 comments anilist, Com › shorts › wamagypnlfo오바미츠.

Choloc 야동

Com › watch오바미츠2 youtube. @oo1001oo 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 오바미츠 만화를 솔직하게 리뷰하고 추천합니다, 오바미츠는 작가가 대놓고 보여주는 커플, 33k likes, 134 comments anilist. 좋아요 270개,빡빡이 @pakppagi 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 오바미츠 misturi obanai kny kimetsunoyaiba demonslayer.

Com › shorts › wamagypnlfo오바미츠. Com › @user52903298619836 › videotiktok. Com › watch오바미츠2 youtube, User399 죽고나서 관까지 같이 들어간 오바미츠 귀멸의 칼날fyp 관리자님추천뜨게해주세요 추천떠라. 전체보기 13개의 글 전체보기목록열기 귀멸의 칼날 번역 귀멸의 칼날오바미츠 번역 사랑하는 사람.

Cfnm 만화

Com › @user52903298619836 › videotiktok, No one noticed x thotiana wya adrian dj, 영상에선 오바미츠 칸로지 미츠리, 이구로 오바나이 에 대한 설명과 더불어 귀멸의 칼날 만화책 표지에 숨겨진 의미도 나름 해석해준다 근데 가운데 만화책이 뭔가 낯익네 믱, 전체보기 13개의 글 전체보기목록열기 귀멸의 칼날 번역 귀멸의 칼날오바미츠 번역 사랑하는 사람.

Kr on aug 스포x 무한성 도입부 보고 만든 오바미츠 모음 zip 애니추천 귀멸의칼날 귀칼 무한성 귀멸의칼날극장판 미츠리 이구로 demonslayer 鬼滅の刃, 오늘 소개해드릴 만화는 저번과 마찬가지로 오바미츠 만화를 준비해왔는데요, 귀멸의칼날 귀칼 칸로지 시험끝나고 신나게 놀다가 복귀, 오늘도 오바미츠의 만화를 가져왔습니당.

원작은 단행본 형식이라 세세한 심리 묘사나 배경 설정이 풍부한 반면, 애니메이션은 시각적 효과와 음악을 활용해 분위기를 더 강조하는 편이죠. 금요일에 만나요 speed up cover by liz うらら. 좋아요 44개,뮹칠 @user9836 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 미츠리에스크했어용 참고옍🌟 님윤슬 님무영공 귀칼 오바미츠 fyp 추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천. Com › hmannayou12 › 221898810778오바미츠가 살아난 만화 네이버 블로그. 영상에선 오바미츠 칸로지 미츠리, 이구로 오바나이 에 대한 설명과 더불어 귀멸의 칼날 만화책 표지에 숨겨진 의미도 나름 해석해준다 근데 가운데 만화책이 뭔가 낯익네 믱. Blog 귀멸의 칼날 1,003개의 글 목록열기.

｜propic @dal_li_0130.. 그래서 약속의 네버랜드 표지에도 뭔가 숨겨진 의미가 있나 찾아보았지만 별다른.. 달리｜propics image on x.. 오바미츠 귀멸의 칼날 이구로 오바나이 어린시절부터 무한성까지 사주 21세조 무한성편 伊黒小芭内 蛇柱 21歳組 鬼滅の刃 無限城編 過去編 泣ける 美形..

Deepfake Kpop Hentai

오바미츠 귀멸의 칼날 이구로 오바나이 어린시절부터 무한성까지 사주 21세조 무한성편 伊黒小芭内 蛇柱 21歳組 鬼滅の刃 無限城編 過去編 泣ける 美形. @oo1001oo 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 오바미츠 만화를 솔직하게 리뷰하고 추천합니다. 금요일에 만나요 speed up cover by liz うらら.

See more fan art related to obanai iguro, obamitsu, mitsuri kanroji and saishuukessenn on pixiv. 2 drawings on pixiv, japan, Com › @oo1001oo › video오바미츠 만화 추천과 솔직한 리뷰 tiktok, 귀멸의 칼날을 시작할 때 누가 나한테 배 때문에 마음 아플 거라고 경고해줬어야 했는데.

darkgg.com 이 둘의 이야기는 말 그대로 read more. 이 둘의 이야기는 말 그대로 read more. Com › @oo1001oo › video오바미츠 만화 추천과 솔직한 리뷰 tiktok. 이구로의 과거와 두 사람의 유언 등이 공개되자 커플링의 인기가 급속도로 상승했다. 좋아요 44개,뮹칠 @user9836 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 미츠리에스크했어용 참고옍🌟 님윤슬 님무영공 귀칼 오바미츠 fyp 추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천. dasom_lovely 라이키 디시

cleaner_densetsu 공략 제발 이노아오도 대놓고 보여주세요 오바미츠 이노아오 젠네즈 탄카나. 영상에선 오바미츠 칸로지 미츠리, 이구로 오바나이 에 대한 설명과 더불어 귀멸의 칼날 만화책 표지에 숨겨진 의미도 나름 해석해준다 근데 가운데 만화책이 뭔가 낯익네 믱. 귀멸의 칼날을 시작할 때 누가 나한테 배 때문에 마음 아플 거라고 경고해줬어야 했는데. Com › shorts › wamagypnlfo오바미츠. 그래서 약속의 네버랜드 표지에도 뭔가 숨겨진 의미가 있나 찾아보았지만 별다른. cortis deepfake

burj khalifa elevator buttons 오늘 소개해드릴 만화는 저번과 마찬가지로 오바미츠 만화를 준비해왔는데요. 오늘 소개해드릴 만화는 저번과 마찬가지로 오바미츠 만화를 준비해왔는데요. User399 죽고나서 관까지 같이 들어간 오바미츠 귀멸의 칼날fyp 관리자님추천뜨게해주세요 추천떠라. 벚꽃공쥬님 생일 축하축하 트위터업로드 이미지는 영어오타 있었는데 전혀 모르고 있다가 업로드 할때 알아서 수정본으로 창피. 33k likes, 134 comments anilist. deepfakekpop porn

coprophagia hitomi No one noticed x thotiana wya adrian dj. 안녕하세요 만화를 좋아하는 홍덕후입니다. 오바미츠 귀멸의 칼날 이구로 오바나이 어린시절부터 무한성까지 사주 21세조 무한성편 伊黒小芭内 蛇柱 21歳組 鬼滅の刃 無限城編 過去編 泣ける 美形. 2 drawings on pixiv, japan. 오늘은 귀멸의 칼날 귀멸학원 2탄입니다.

daniellexxvv ero Blog 귀멸의 칼날 1,003개의 글 목록열기. Pinterest에서 오바미츠에 관한 아이디어를 찾고 저장하세요. Com › shorts › wamagypnlfo오바미츠. 오늘도 오바미츠의 만화를 가져왔습니당. 제발 이노아오도 대놓고 보여주세요 오바미츠 이노아오 젠네즈 탄카나.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.